US and A minta Iran pulangkan surveillance drone

epal10

Aku rasa seluruh dunia USA dah intip. silap2 fail kerajaan yang bertanda  rahsia besar,rahsia,sulit,terhad pun boleh bocor lantaran kecanggihan teknologi internet dan komunikasi.

kucingTomey

menatang drone ni kalu main red alert 3 uprising ada ...kehkhekhekhe wa selalu pakai nak kalu amek usa...last2 kena tembak ngan BTR prc

HarizAzhari

Bagus drone ni. Walaupun malfunction tapi boleh mendarat tanpa ada cacat cela yang ketara.

ChildrenOfBodom

ahmadinejad to obama

you just got pwn3d hard

shahx

kalo tak pulangkan, us akan serang iran...

dauswq

aku ingat drone ni

mr_oscar

Iran ni tak aci laa...org main2 je   

bluezink

from an armchair perspective ....iranians using avtobaza tech to bring it down serupe mcam serah tengkuk lombu fidlot utk disembelihkan

MerryPropa

US ni ingat dia jer yang pandai buat senjata canggih manggih.... tu yang dok menegakkan drone dia malfunctioned padahal Iran dengan selamber jer beat dia nyer technology.. padan muka... rasanya sekarang ni US dah mula gelisah..

Vokuro

Jikalau di lihat kan kepada keadaan drone itu nampak seperti iya betul iran hijacked drone itu secara elektronik.

Oleh itu don't underestimate kebolehan ummah iran ini.

coY

something suspicious here. This is not a good sign. trust me. come back to this thread at least 1 year from now.

enchezam

tah tah buat buat jatuh, surveillance punya equipment kat dalam tu on lagi, abihler secret bunker iran kena bom nanti

i_m_fake

kalo tak pulangkan, us akan serang iran...
shahx Post at 13-12-2011 16:28

iran dpt sokongan drpd kesultanan uganda...apa dia nak takut

Acong

kasi china mass produce dulu baru pulang balik.
ushioz Post at 13-12-2011 07:55

now everyone can buy a drone....!

Acong

Hahahaaha... Ko yg buat illegal trespass dalam airspace org.. Pastu boleh pulak terhegeh2 mintak pul ...
Cakkkk....aaaa Post at 13-12-2011 08:18

biasa laa........... USA nie bangang.....

Acong

Avtobaza: Iran's weapon in alleged RQ-170 affair?

By Stephen Trimble on December 5, 2011 10:30 AM | Permalink | Comments (61) | TrackBacks (0) |ShareThis
Could this be the smoking electron in the alleged unmanned air vehicle (UAV) incident over Iran?

The original reports that Iran "shot down" a Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel appear to be misleading. Iranian news agency reports credited the army's electronic warfare unit with bringing down the UAV, but apparently in a way that limited the amount of damage on landing or impact.

Only six weeks ago, Russia announced delivering the Avtobaza ground-based electronic intelligence and jamming system (shown above) to Iran. Most Russian weapons exports to Iran are blocked, including the proposed transfer of the S-300 surface to air missile system. But there is a key difference between a SAM battery and a jamming system. The S-300 can vastly complicate a strike on an Iranian nuclear site at Natanz or Qoms. A jamming system, such as the Avtobaza, is unlikely to be used to defend such a site because it could interfere with the radar of the S-300 or the Tor-M1 SAM battery.

The Avtobaza, moreover, is designed to jam side-looking and fire control radars on aircraft and manipulate the guidance and control systems of incoming enemy missiles. It would be the perfect tool to target and perhaps infiltrate the communications link that allows a UAV to be controlled from a remote location.

The incident, of course, has not been confirmed with visual evidence of the allegedly captured RQ-170. Unlike 50 years ago, when the Soviet Union shot down the Lockheed U-2, the Iranians will not be able to produce a captured Francis Gary Powers. In 1961, the Soviets appeared to destroy their credibility by releasing imagery of the wreckage of the wrong aircraft -- a luckless MiG possibly shot down by mistake in the fusillade aimed at Powers' U-2. When the Soviets produced Powers, who survived and was captured, the world finally had undeniable proof.

So there is no script in the propaganda textbook for these kinds of incidents. They tend to evolve in their own way. Iran may never produce evidence to back up their claims, or they might later today.  

Interestingly, the International Security Assistance Force has made no effort to deny Iran's claims. Instead, the NATO headquarters in Kabul issued a statement acknowledging the loss of one of their UAVs over western Afghanistan last week. The statement also suggested the Iranians may have simply found the misplaced UAV for them. It may be important that NATO officials did not deny Iran's claims that the UAV was the RQ-170, which is known to operate from Kandahar where it was originally spotted.

http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2011/12/avtobaza-irans-weapon-in-rq-17.html

tempur

Aku rasa seluruh dunia USA dah intip. silap2 fail kerajaan yang bertanda  rahsia besar,rahsia,sulit, ...
epal10 Post at 13-12-2011 16:12

Laa baru tau ke.... siapa yang buat komputer dan internet ni.... tujuan asal adalah utk tujuan ketenteraan....selagi kita menggunakan perisian window atau apple selagi itu la maklumat kita diintip.............

DCrystal

Patutnya pakai 'Air Swimmers' buat intipan. Senyap jer... radar pun takleh kesan.

Cakkkk....aaaa

malfuntion? lps tgk gambar drone tu cantik molek je, aku lebih percaya tentera Iran berjaya  ...
Pikir Post at 13-12-2011 16:08

aku berharap teknologi iran sudah mampu menghasilkan anti-drone yg menangkap stealth drone US kat mid air dan bawak balik ke sarang (lair) ...

that explains why drone to takde cacat cela....

d'zeck

kalau korang nak semula drone yang satu ni,
korang kena tukar gantikan dengan enam drone yang baru

tegas iran kepada amerika