|
|
[Tempatan]
Edisi tahukah? : IMF->Kenapa Malaysia terlepas drpd krisis kewangan sedunia?
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Anak_Nogori posted on 28-9-2012 07:59 AM 
apa yg 5229 nak kena google?..pasal tun tambat ringgit ke pasal anwat naikkan interest rate tu?..
...
cuma nk google apa yg terjadi time tu..ingat2 lupa la AN...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5229 posted on 28-9-2012 08:06 AM
cuma nk google apa yg terjadi time tu..ingat2 lupa la AN...
apa yg AL cakap tu dah betul lah tu..tun tambat ringgit, terus berhenti spekulate ringgit...pasal anwat tu plak...apa yg dia pegang...semuanya tak betul...cer google cari apa yg anwar buat yg baik masa dia jadi menteri dia jadi TPM...hancus buntut org dikerjakannya.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yg busuk2 tempat dikutuk semua campak kat anwart.....
yg bersyukur bagi kat kerani bank negara...
yg dapat kredit hulur kat mamak keling....
yg disalahkan soros...
penyangak sebenar dalam perlumbaan matawang....siapa..??????????? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ops... kenapa lately nih terlalu banyak sangat cerita tentang mengenang jasa maha kutty yer....??
kenapa citer2 mamak kutty dinaikkan semula... dan meratib kenang jasa dalam doamu semula...??
adakah kerana reputasi dan kebodohan najib semenjak 2 menjak sekarnag nih semakin terserlah kebodohannya.. maka nama mamak kutty disebut2 semula untuk menaikkan rating UMNO...??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ni gigih ratib mahathir lah anwart la soros la kerani bank negara lah...BACA ARTIKEL KA DAK NI?
artikel ni pasai krisis kewangan DUNIA taun 98 kaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
walau apa pun syukur kerna mahathir telah mengupah yahudi solomon smith barney (mirzan ka mokhzani ka pernah keja dgn bank yahudi ni dulu) sbg konsultan untuk menstrukturkan semula industri perbankan kita selepas krisis kewangan 98 dahulu  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Muntz posted on 28-9-2012 08:49 AM
Sbb takder org lagi dah yg boleh naikkan sokongan rakyat kpd UMNO.
ko nampak tak berita sekarang muntz... lately dok giat kembali meratib kenang jasa maha kutty semula... najib dah tenggelam sebab dah buat macam2 cara nak naikkan nama najib.. tapi tetap busuk dan nampak bodonya beliau...jadi terpaksa ulang cerita lama kenang jasa dalam doamu maha kutty....
ingat sekarnag maha kutty kaa pimpin negara... ghahahahaa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
slippergombak posted on 28-9-2012 08:15 AM
yg busuk2 tempat dikutuk semua campak kat anwart.....
yg bersyukur bagi kat kerani bank negara...
...
salahkan spekulator matawang walhal sendiri yg hulur tengkok utk disembelih. bank negara tak sepatutnya terlibat dlm forex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tobby posted on 28-9-2012 02:24 PM
salahkan spekulator matawang walhal sendiri yg hulur tengkok utk disembelih. bank negara tak sepat ...
maha kutty dah kata dah.. perompak2 wang negara nih terdiri daripada org2 bodo rendah pelajaran jerk.... salah sendiri tuduh org lain... kaitkan ngan yahudi... sendiri yg tak pandai menari.. sekali kena con... nak selamatkan tengkuk sendiri ratib org lain....
maka sujud syukur laa pencacai2 UMNO dapat meratib 5 kali sehari semalam...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kira-kira keturunan chetiar mamak & keling ni baguih jugak jaga bank... (refer to India / Malaysia)  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
selepas krisis 98, Msia dah strukturkn semula bank2 dgn M&A ie kecikkan jumlah bank dan bbrp polisi baru. Secara tak lansung mengukuhkan local bank2. Bank2 luar plak dihadkan perkembangannya dan bank luar dibenarkan miliki bank tempatan tp tak melebihi 30%. Selain tu, dana2 yg dikutip dimsia melalui unit amanah tidak benarkan melabur diluar negara. Bg aku ni satu faktor jugak bank tempatan tidak terjebak dlm sub-prime mortgage crisis tahun 2008 dulu. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
walaupun yahud IMF dah kenceng keliling satu donia, tapi cai2 urben kokosen wannabe masih dok defend depa lagi....ekekekeke.....nor yakub minum dgn soros pun jadi hal. Soros tu tarap2 kerani bank negara jah...ekekeke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camnapun aku salute dengan late tan sri jaafar husin. Malaysian finance legend. Nor yacob dapat tempias2 dia pun dah tere. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Al Lebam posted on 28-9-2012 06:50 AM
lepas baca hang punya komen.. jelas hang tak tau apa yang hang cakap..
tak yah buang masa la.. ha ...
...errrr sapa yang tak tau apa nih bro.?
Pertama: artikel ni cerita scenario semasa, yang hang dok jaja tu cerita tahun 1998, completely different situations & different problems.
Kedua: ok lah, since hang bukak cerita 1998, kenapa tak ambik kira pendapat yang kritik capital control tuh? macam aku cakap terdahulu, Korea pakai ubat IMF & M'sia tidak, tapi kedua2 negara tak jauh beza dari segi recovery. dan M'sia cuma BERNASIB BAIK sebab ekonominya dapat recover kebetulan pada masa keadaan ekonomi dunia dah mula pick-up masa itu, tak perlulah Madey Kutty Kerala dok klaim itu semua hasil keja dia...ini aku quote kata2 Jeffry Sachs (another Nobel Laureatte) & Stanley Fisher (gabenor bank pusat terbaik dunia tuh). Even Krugman pun cakap M'sia dapat recover hanya kerana world's economy dah mula naik, soal correct timing aje......
...dan paling penting resultnya hari ini, ambik satu contoh nak compare M'sia dgn Korea - hutang negara, sapa lebey baik posisinya....hang tentu dapat agak kan...
By Dani Rodriks & Ethan Kaplan
Critics of conventional economic wisdom demurred, arguing that, although capital controls didn’t hurt Malaysia, they didn’t help either. Economist Paul Krugman claimed: “the market panic of 1997-98 was, it turns out, coming to an end just about the time that Malaysia decided to make its big break with orthodoxy.”
With hindsight, economists and policymakers have assessed the impact of the controls by comparing Malaysia’s growth rates with growth rates in Korea between 1997-1999. Seeing that they looked reasonably similar, they concluded that Malaysia’s controls didn’t help or hurt any more or any less than going to the IMF. Malaysia’s economy recovered, it was said, because the external environment improved.
Capital Controls: Malaysia - Anya Schiffrin
Economists generally agree that the controls were effective in stemming short-term outflows of capital from Malaysia and preventing the kind of upheaval and pain neighboring economies suffered during the crisis. But there is still debate as to how helpful they have been over the long run, and how difficult they could be to apply in other countries.
Some, such as MIT economist Rudy Dornbusch, say that the controls did not help Malaysia recover faster than other countries hit by the 1997 Asia crisis. Others, such as Paul Krugman and Harvard's Jeffrey Sachs say the Malaysian economy may have picked up without Mahathir's efforts. And in October 1999, the International Monetary Fund's then-deputy managing director, Stanley Fischer, said the effects of the controls were hard to measure. He noted that they were imposed at a time when capital flows to the region had already started to pick up and were never tested against severe downward pressures.
Last edited by pyropura on 29-9-2012 12:14 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 28-9-2012 08:06 AM
