TSKI difitnah lagi dlm isu tanah tropicana....!

Acong

Why is DAP siding with PKR to replace MB Khalid?

To recap: In April 2013, a vast swathe of land, covering 1,172 acres – that lies close to Kota Kemuning, Putra Heights and Bandar Rimbayu with accessibility to four major highways - was sold to Tropicana for RM1.297 billion, payable over a period of 20 years.

Less than ten months later, in Jan 2014, Tropicana sold just 25% of this land (308.72 acres) to Eco World for RM470.67 million cash. Up to that point, the only payment it had made to Permodalan Negeri Selangor Bhd (PNSB) was a deposit of RM50 million.

On hearing this, on March 29, Khalid was fuming mad and requested accelerated payment from Tropicana for the sum of RM844.2 million instead of RM1.3 billion over 20 years. The sum is yet to be paid.

They were able to make this outrageous sale because under the agreement, some smart fool in PNSB decided to transfer the full power of attorney to all the land to the buyer despite only receiving RM50 million out of RM1.3 billion.

Word on the market is that MB Khalid is making it hard for this sale to Eco World to proceed unless Selangor receives full payment.

Tropicana is still negotiating with MB Khalid for this but Khalid is insistent on the full amount to be paid first before allowing the transfer : http://www.bursamalaysia.com/mar ... nouncements/1581685

BTW, Tropicana is owned by Danny Tan.

Danny Tan and brother Vincent Tan are now doing big-time property development in Penang including the RM10 billion GDV Bayan Mutiara Penang World City project (where they bought the land at a very cheap RM240 psf payable over 5 years from the Penang State Govt) and also the IKEA Batu Kawan deal thru Ivory Properties Group. Vincent Tan is also involved in the multi-billion redeveloping of the Penang Turf Club

So, other than a common big-time property developer,friends, why else is DAP concerned with removing Khalid as Selangor MB?

Perhaps this article from more than one year ago before GE13 by RPK regarding this land sale can shed some light. Look for two senior DAP leaders (and one senior PKR leader) that RPK had implicated in his story here:

The names are in the same paragraph as the RM200 million "donation".

By the way, coincidence of coincidence. Both of these two very senior DAP leaders have since been dropped as Selangor EXCO with one not even getting a seat to contest in GE13. I wonder why?

Is it also why in January, Khalid removed Azmin Ali as a director in PKNS and a bunch of people were fired from there too - and hence leading to the "kajang move" in Feb? And also why there is "restructuring" in PNSB?

MUST READ: http://www.malaysia-today.net/abu-abu-abu/

lol.. this deal is not gonna be easy to explain for them..

1) why the extra generous 20 years payment terms?
2) who transferred full ownership of the land to them even though they only paid RM50 million out of RM1.3 billion deposit and hence allowing them to make RM420million cash profit within 10 months.
3) Why did MB Khalid get angry and demanded full payment immediately instead of 20 years - just less than a year after the contract was signed?



Ganyang PKR.......!!!

Acong

ABU! ABU! ABU!
April 16, 2013

Dijaya originally bid only RM895 million (payable over 20 years) while SP Setia Berhad bid RM1.15 billion (payable over only 6-8 years) and Mah Sing Group Bhd bid RM945 million (payable over only 7 years). This means Dijaya cannot get the deal because their bid is the least attractive of the three. Dijaya was then asked to up their price to RM1.3 billion in a  ‘behind-the-scenes’ negotiation.


THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja Petra Kamarudin


I am glad that a lot of dirt was revealed recently regarding the billions of ringgit worth of ‘rush jobs’ that Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak did to beat the 13th General Election deadline. Should a ‘caretaker government’ commit the country to billions of ringgit in contracts when there is always a possibility that the government may change the night of Polling Day?

Of course, there is nothing illegal here and we will not be able to indict and convict anyone for any crime. After all, although Parliament may have been dissolved, life must still go on and it is still business as usual. Nevertheless, there is still the issue of moral although the issue of legal does not arise.

If you just want to focus on legal issues while you ignore moral issues, then for a politician to be caught bonking another woman in a hotel room is not something illegal or criminal. However, it is certainly immoral. Hence the moral aspect of your actions must also be questioned even if there is nothing illegal in what you do.

Another moral issue is concerning the news item below regarding the RM1.3 billion deal (with a RM20 billion earning potential) involving the Selangor State ‘Caretaker’ Government and Dijaya Corporation.

According to the Selangor Menteri Besar, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim, the deal has not been finalised yet (MB says Dijaya deal not finalised). According to the market, however, it is actually a done-deal.

As I said, this is only a moral issue. Is it a done-deal or is the deal not yet finalised? There are mixed signals here. And should the caretaker government commit the state to this deal when there may be a possibility that the state government may change hands by dinnertime of 5th May 2013?

According to the critics of the deal, this is exactly why they are rushing the deal before 5th May 2013. Pakatan Rakyat is not sure whether it can retain the state so it wants the deal wrapped up before then.

That is one issue.

The second issue is: Dijaya originally bid only RM895 million (payable over 20 years) while SP Setia Berhad bid RM1.15 billion (payable over only 6-8 years) and Mah Sing Group Bhd bid RM945 million (payable over only 7 years). This means Dijaya cannot get the deal because their bid is the least attractive of the three. Dijaya was then asked to up their price to RM1.3 billion in a  ‘behind-the-scenes’ negotiation.

Why was Dijaya given the privilege of a behind-the-scenes negotiation and allowed a second bite of the cherry? This is what the other bidders are unhappy about. A tender is a tender and the highest price should get it (if all bidders equally qualify, of course). In this case, Dijaya was allowed to revise their price to out-bid the others.

Interestingly enough, the people behind Dijaya are Ronnie Liu, Teresa Kok and Azmin Ali. And even more interesting is the fact that Dijaya has ‘donated’ RM200 million to Pakatan Rakyat Selangor’s war chest. Furthermore, Azmin threatened to drop Khalid from a Selangor state seat if he objects to the deal and tries to block it (and if Khalid keeps quiet and supports the deal he would be given the Port Kelang state seat).

Now hold on a minute, I thought that the man behind Dijaya is Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s crony, Tan Sri Dato’ Danny Tan Chee Sing! You mean Dr Mahathir’s cronies are also Pakatan Rakyat’s cronies?

Hmm…that is most interesting. No wonder Umno did not make any noise about this. Is this what ABU is all about? Reject Umno but keep giving the Umno cronies plenty of money under a Pakatan Rakyat government?

Well, what does Raja Petra Kamarudin know? After all, he is living in Manchester and does not know what is going on in Malaysia. And Pakatan Rakyat Selangor can certainly do with the RM200 million ‘donation’ to face the coming general election. And does not the ends justify the means (matlamat menghalalkan cara)?


http://www.malaysia-today.net/abu-abu-abu/