CariDotMy

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

View: 1840|Reply: 8

--Deleted--

[Copy link]
Post time 2-6-2008 08:59 PM | Show all posts |Read mode
--Deleted-- Last edited by deskcom on 19-12-2012 07:29 AM

Rate

1

View Rating Log

Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 3-6-2008 12:21 AM | Show all posts
cari feedback dari asus pulak.
Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 3-6-2008 12:54 AM | Show all posts
Gigabyte to apologize to Asustek


Staff reporter, Beijing and Ricky Morris, Taipei; Joseph Tsai, DIGITIMES [Friday 30 May 2008]



The legal battle between motherboard makers Gigabyte Technology and Asustek Computer looks set to be over before it even started, with Gigabyte agreeing to issue a public apology.

Tensions between the two companies flared up over "defamatory" comments and comparisons Gigabyte made in a internal document which challenged Asustek's claims of using high-quality components in its motherboards, and the merits of Asustek's EPU energy saving technology and its own DES equivalent.

Asustek took issue with the particularly strong wording used in the document and that Gigabyte failed to present independent test results. Problems also arose from the juxtaposition of an image of "blown" capacitors on an unidentified maker's product alongside an Asustek motherboard, which Asustek alleged was an attempt by Gigabyte to imply Asustek products were of equally poor quality. In response Asustek lodged a complaint with Taiwan's Fair Trade Commission (FTC) and initiated legal proceedings against the Gigabyte employee responsible for writing the document.

While stressing that it stands by the original intent of the document – that its DES technology is superior to Asustek's EPU – Gigabyte said it acknowledged the grievances raised by its competitor and has agreed to issue an official apology which will be published, at its expense, in Taiwan newspapers on June 1.

In turn, Asustek has agreed to drop all proceedings related to the issue.


ni la orang kata takde kerja cari kerja.. tapi mmg bagi kesan pun...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 3-6-2008 03:42 AM | Show all posts
1st post tuh, article tu date bape hb?
Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 3-6-2008 04:06 AM | Show all posts

Reply #4 bzzts's post

12:10 PM - May 13, 2008 by Tuan Nguyen in Los Angeles

walaupun x percaya semuanya... tapi data
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 3-6-2008 04:16 AM | Show all posts

Reply #5 deskcom's post

cari nahas tol le gigabyte nih.
dah la suma barang mahal.

2nd article dah state dah ada component yg tak dikenalpasti dok kat mobo asus yg diorg test tu.
macam nk sabotaj je.

Problems also arose from the juxtaposition of an image of "blown" capacitors on an unidentified maker's product alongside an Asustek motherboard, which Asustek alleged was an attempt by Gigabyte to imply Asustek products were of equally poor quality.

. . . . gigabyte agree to issue an official apology which will be published, at its expense, in Taiwan newspapers on June 1."


asus selambe je kira cincai, tutup kes... kata 1 june? hari ni dah masuk 3 june.

[ Last edited by  bzzts at 3-6-2008 04:43 AM ]
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
Post time 3-6-2008 04:37 AM | Show all posts
lama gak da kes ni kan ... dua dua otai pc .. hehe
Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 3-6-2008 09:41 AM | Show all posts

Reply #7 rasyid's post

tu la pasal
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Reign This user has been deleted
Post time 3-6-2008 10:04 AM | Show all posts
Tak kira apa pun. Mobo Asus org cari utk OverClock... pengguna tidak complain pun pasal benda ni..?  Tapi bagus gak, nanti produk Asus turun harga...
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT


Forum Hot Topic

 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CariDotMy

12-12-2024 07:36 PM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.687025 second(s), 28 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list