Apa yg leh Increase imun system kita?

makcikmengamok

Originally posted by seri_air at 11-5-2009 13:14


Makcik ko ingat aku punya engrand cekai sangat kaaaa?

i mean...aku salu tengok ko aktif kat FD..
tapi tak pernah tengok ko cakap english kat FD...

seri_air

Originally posted by makcikmengamok at 11-5-2009 17:59


i mean...aku salu tengok ko aktif kat FD..
tapi tak pernah tengok ko cakap english kat FD...

Nak cakap engrand buat apa kat fd kalau sume rakyat selesa berbahasa pasar?

When you're in rome, well, you know...

Sorry, off topic.

AnitaSabrina

I go off for 2 days and come back to see this thread getting very interesting indeed.

I had a friend that swears ionizers helped to reduce her asthma & her son's asthma.  That ionizer thing cost a lot of money - couple of thousand ringgits.  The ionizers has broken down and she's not repairing it or buying a new one.  So, I suppose its not that effective after all.  

Another thing is a dust mite suction vacuum thingy by an American company. I don't remember the name.  My brother bought one of those.  Its another expensive gadget.  If I'm not mistake it was more than RM10k.  

I'm not one for gadgets.  Those things claim the moon, sky, earth and everything else in between.  I doubt it very much.  

As for Transfer Factor - another expensive supplement.  I gave this to my son who has severe asthma.  It only appeared to be good for about 4 months after that the effect wore off.  So much for all the brouhaha about it being a miracle bla bla bla.

arnauld

"the first post you said the negative ions supply the energy.....the second, you said the cells produce the chemical energy which then give rise to the negative ions....

not contradicting?....hmmm....you're gonna have a hard time if you are ever in a court....."

It's plain clear che kak, I've just put the equation in the bracket, if the judge still dont get it, then you cant blame me;-))

"I am saying that negative ions is the electrical energy, from chemical energy it converts into electrical energy (negative ions) before finally convert into potential energy that we have."

That research materials (summary) were for people on the street to understand, in fact it was a summary. definitely they are not going to put the epsilon square value or even the mathematical model in it so that laymen can understand.

just a suggestion, I think it will better present your professionalism if you can present to the audience a research, of course a well conducted one, you know a well designed with proper sampling justification, doe selection whether it is full factorial, a fractional factorial, or even ofat, or even taguchi method, or even mahalanobis or even rsm, with qualified residual fitting that can prove the alternative hypothesis of the argument. you can set your own confidence level, blocking option, number of replication or even the number of repetition as well as the resolution of the trials. and of course you  know of including the random trials, with controls, placebo and double blinded! I think this will be a better way to accept the alternative hypothesis rather than trying very hard to misunderstand my well described and written prognosis since you dont want to read Dr Becker books yourself.

you know, bring you own scientific evidence to the alternative hypothesis rather than confusing yourself on the language issues.

senang2 I datang tengok lagi...;-)))

Arissa_Sofea

whatever.....
you still can't see the contradiction in your arguments....i've lost interest NOW

it's not my job the prove otherwise...
you're the one suggesting it....

don't have to say all that big words to sound smart...whatever...you win...go with your ionizer dude
ive lost interest sorry

[ Last edited by  Arissa_Sofea at 13-5-2009 00:27 ]