|
|
Fazura akhirnya bebas tuduhan langgar kontrak
[Copy link]
|
|
|
explaination yg terang lagi bersuluh gitew
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aku assist buat kes ni. actually fazura mmg dah buat semua keje as per contract dan maydan pun mengaku masa keterangan bayaran mmg setimpal dengan kerja yang fazura dah buat. dan product tu pun takda pengesahan kkm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PristineOne replied at 18-6-2020 04:11 PM
Pajura menang kes sebab nasib baik atas dasar teknikal....asas dia kena saman tu betul, tak promote ...
Yes. Kiranya dia nasib baik.
"Saya sebenarya tak sedar langsung yang produk ini tak sah. Begitu juga dengan kontraknya yang juga tak sah," katanya |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F685 replied at 18-6-2020 04:21 PM
Boleh plk jawab mcm ni ?
Kau & management tak check dulu ke ?
Nak tolong melayu katanya |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dia tak promote pun sebab produk tu tak dpt kelulusan kkm kan. Bagusla. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by hanipinky at 18-6-2020 05:59 PM
PristineOne replied at 18-6-2020 05:11 PM
Pajura menang kes sebab nasib baik atas dasar teknikal....asas dia kena saman tu betul, tak promote ...
Tak jugak.
In the article published by Mstar, Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi even ruled out (menolak) yang Faz ada langgar sebarang kontrak dgn Maydan Trading and in fact, Faz dah fulfilled all her duties till Maydan decided to terminate her from the contract.
Therefore, since defendan sendiri yang end the contact with Faz, so the contract between Faz and Maydan is no longer valid (void) and the only contract that remains at the time was between Maydan and Universal.
And since the product pun illegal, makanya contract Maydan dgn Universal pun automatically terbatal.
You guys can read the full article here:
https://www.mstar.com.my/spotlight/sensasi/2020/06/18/fazura-lega-bebas-tuduhan-langgar-kontrak-produk-dipromosi-rupa-rupanya-tidak-sah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
apedehal replied at 18-6-2020 04:27 PM
Nasib baik pajura bolayan nk promo produk ni..kalau x smpai bang jamil mampos pun haters buat baha ...
Tapi lakinya patah dulu selalu promote maydan ni kan? Maknanya dia pon jenis xkisah ada kelulusan atau tak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bengongnyer la maydan produk ko xde kkm pastu ko nak lawan sampai naik court..saksi pun sebelahkan fazura..x ker memalukan diri sendiri..settle blakang x boleh ker..ape benda mengarut la ni..hahahaha...bengongg x boleh bawak bincang dah ni...padan muka.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tombolpintu replied at 18-6-2020 05:53 PM
aku assist buat kes ni. actually fazura mmg dah buat semua keje as per contract dan maydan pun menga ...
Yes correct! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F685 replied at 18-6-2020 05:21 PM
Boleh plk jawab mcm ni ?
Kau & management tak check dulu ke ?
Patutnya bukan fazura cek.. patut management dia yg cek.. tp itu la.. mgk lepas ni mgt company kene lebih hati2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PristineOne replied at 18-6-2020 05:11 PM
Pajura menang kes sebab nasib baik atas dasar teknikal....asas dia kena saman tu betul, tak promote ...
Ya aku tgk pun gitu. Menang atas sebab teknikal je. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LadyCarefree replied at 18-6-2020 05:58 PM
Tapi lakinya patah dulu selalu promote maydan ni kan? Maknanya dia pon jenis xkisah ada kelulusan ...
Fatah promote other product, a shampoo if not mistaken, not Q-Tab tu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Produk2 mekjura semua ada kelulusan kkm kah? Sijil halal kah? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tombolpintu replied at 18-6-2020 06:00 PM
Patutnya bukan fazura cek.. patut management dia yg cek.. tp itu la.. mgk lepas ni mgt company ken ...
Yes, thats the purpose of having a management company (their legal team la sepatutnya), to vet all the terms stated in any contracts, and then advice the relevant parties mcm CEO or artist to sign or not to sign the contract |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hanipinky replied at 18-6-2020 06:03 PM
Yes, thats the purpose of having a management company (their legal team la sepatutnya), to vet all ...
Ye betul la sbb mgt company pun ada komisen jugak dlm Payment yg fazura terima |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by hazfy at 18-6-2020 06:09 PM
gadget replied at 18-6-2020 05:29 PM
aku rasa, base on kes ni, fazura mmg langgar kontrak, tp nasib dia baik sbb produk tu takde KKM, s ...
Sorry ya nak jwb salah tu.anak owner itu sendiri jadi saksi fazura sudah pun menjalankan tugas dia sebagai duta produk ni.tp bila dia diarahkan UM sendiri untuk stop promote sebab kontrak dibatalkan mereka. Jadi dia hanya promote ikut byran yg dia terima dan tempoh smpai bila dan arahan UM.tiada istilah dia melaggar kontrak..dlm kontrak dia tak ada larangan pun tak boleh buat bisnis kecantikan lain...anak owner tu pun tau sebab ni tp owner tu yg nak jugak bwa ke court.
Tiada kelulusan KKM hanya salah satu antara asbab kemenangan fazura bkn sebab nasib baik sahaja.
Mungkin Allah nak bantu dia sebab dipihak benar..malah dia tak minta byran balik tinggi pun untuk tuntutan balik cuma dia nak bersihkn nama dia je
Boleh baca artikel ni
https://www.hmetro.com.my/node/427374/amp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berapa la agaknya nilai kontrak asal ye? Mesti lumayan sbb faz ckp 50k yg dia tuntut tu sikit sgt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aku speku produk ni tak laku, so owner dia nak cover balik kerugian, dia gi saman duta, untung2 menang boleh la balik modal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fazura ni tak yah beria2 make up dan dressing..pakai simple mcm ni pon dah wow sgt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kalau terbatal..kena byr balik..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 18-6-2020 05:49 PM
