|
Gambaran Indahnya Syurga, Ini Gambar Terbaru Hajarul Aswad
[Copy link]
|
|
Normabaru replied at 5-5-2021 02:33 PM
Arab saudi punyala bff dgn india
Smpi RS dtg india, shake hand bg bekalan oksigen and fund kt in ...
Fake yer news ni
Harap maklong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Azharitubunga replied at 5-5-2021 04:36 PM
Fake yer news ni
Harap maklong
Mana tahu fake |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by Tinot7 at 5-5-2021 05:06 PM
iols tak jumpa kat insta. iols gugel gambar ni
Images of the Black Stone was taken over several hours using a technique called focus stacking.
https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/saudi-arabia-black-stone-scli-intl/index.html
The Black Stone of Mecca like you've never seen beforeEoin McSweeney, and Mostafa Salem, CNN • Published 4th May 2021
(CNN) — High resolution photos have been revealed for the first time of an ancient religious stone in Mecca, Islam's holy city, a Saudi government agency has announced.
The images of al-Hajar al-Aswad, or the Black Stone, are up to 49,000 megapixels in size and took more than 50 hours to photograph and develop, the General Presidency for the Affairs of the Saudi Grand Mosque and the Prophet's Mosque said in a press release Monday.
The General Presidency worked with the Two Holy Mosques' engineering agency to take 1,050 photos of the stone, each being 160 gigabytes. The stone was photographed for seven hours, the authority said.
A technique was used called focus stacking, which combines multiple photos with different focus points to keep the finished product sharp, according to Digital Photography School.
"It's significant because in a sense this is unprecedented," Afifi al-Akiti, a fellow in Islamic studies at the University of Oxford, who wasn't involved in the project, told CNN.
"One sees that it's not actually black, for example... As I understand it, it's the first time there is a magnified digital photo of the stone and one can see the stone up close and personal."
"In the Muslim tradition, this is considered to be a holy relic, but reason plays a major role in the Muslim tradition... So while it is unprecedented to see a picture of the stone, I think Muslims are down to Earth and science plays a major role in the religion," he added.
Mecca is considered the spiritual center of Islam because it was where the Prophet Mohammed is said to have received his first revelations in the early 7th century.
The stone is framed in pure silver at the southeast corner of the Kaaba (Ka'bah), the cube-shaped building constructed by Abraham and his son Ishmael, according to the Quran.
During the Hajj, Islam's most important annual pilgrimage, devotees walk counter-clockwise around the black monolith.
While the Hajj typically features large crowds crammed around Islam's holiest shrine, much fewer attended in 2020 over fears of Covid-19.
Pilgrims usually touch, kiss, or wave at al-Hajar al-Aswad when walking past.
"The stone originally was apparently white, not black. It's thought mankind touching the stone and seeking forgiveness from God is the reason the stone is black, reflecting the sins of humanity, according to Muslim sources," said al-Akiti.
Muslim tradition dictates that the stone dates back to the prophet Adam, the primordial man, said al-Akiti. In another account, it is believed the angel Gabriel gave the stone to Abraham while he was building the Kaaba, according to Oxford Islamic Studies Online.
Scientists point out that the stone might be a meteorite, al-Akiti said, and that the latter theory may have originated after it fell from the sky.
People kiss the stone today because Omar, the second Muslim caliph, told followers that he had seen the Prophet Mohammed do so himself, said al-Akiti.
baidewei, Afifi al-Akiti tu org mesia.
Afifi al-Akiti
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orix replied at 5-5-2021 02:16 PM
yg warna merah tu ke batunya ? kalau iya, tak indah pun
batu yg kecil2 warna gelap tu.. kedudukannya mcm terapung.. ada beberapa biji tu.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dudaberhias replied at 5-5-2021 02:37 PM
Memang ada hadis atau quran kata hajarul aswad tu gambaran syurga ke bukan ke batu tu je dari syurga ...
ye batu2 tu dari syurga... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tinot7 replied at 5-5-2021 05:04 PM
iols tak jumpa kat insta. iols gugel gambar ni
Thank you dear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jangan terlalu taksub nak cium Hajar Aswad Seperti yang diceritakan tadi, ramai yang nak dapatkan peluang untuk cium Hajar Aswad walaupun sekali untuk seumur hidup. Tapi kalau kita percaya yang Hajar Aswad ada kelebihan tertentu atau manfaat tertentu, kita nampaknya dah salah. Sebab, Saidina Umar sendiri pernah kata: [size=1em]“Sesungguhnya aku mengetahui, engkau hanyalah batu yang tidak memberi manfaat dan mudarat. Jika tidak kerana aku melihat Rasulullah SAW menciummu, nescaya aku tidak akan menciummu.” – Riwayat al-Bukhari dan Muslim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Itu batu besar punya dalam kapala ada duduk! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mana gambarnya?
Gelap kot hati I ni sampai tak nampak apa2 yg indah kat thread ni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dlm Quran tulis sorga ada lautan madu dan lautan arak, boleh minum forever takan habis, tak ketinggalan bidadari utk kaum jantan, bunyi sakan indah gila tapi juga ada unsur 'x~rut '
tapi wanita konpem xde bidadara yer, jgn jeles, dah sembang berkali kali, mmg xde
anyway, kat mana yer lokasi lautan madu dan arak dlm batu tu ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Takde bentuk lain ka nak buat 'bingkai' batu tu?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kalu sorga kat atas .... gambaran langit kat mata manusia normal .... awan dan langit biru jelah ....kalu lagi tinggi dr itu ... angkasa lepas warna dia hitam jelah cam gambaran waktu malam bersama bintang
kalu lagi jauh dr itu ... berapa meter jarak nye ? siapa boleh tolong copy paste Quran yg tulis ... kalu alam yg tak dpt nampak dgn mata ... so gambaran cam alam org bunian la ... cuma tambah dgn laut madu laut arak camtu je
o... tidak ketinggalan pokok buah larangan .... masih ada lagi tak, iols tak pasti
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kepala hotak kau dalam syurga tak ada bidadara lelaki? Tak pernah jumpa perkataan ghilman dalam holy koran? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
menggambarkan betapa indahnya syurga.
Ayat ni tak betul ni.
Keindahan syurga digambarkan oleh batu? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article ni yang sebetulnya kot. Tak de merapu gambaran indahnya syurga daripada hajarul aswad tu kan.
Tq @Tinot7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pernah baca kat komen2 dr puak kafir cakap bentuk hajr aswad mcm puxi wanita... Mmg biadap wpon certain angle ada nmpak juga. Huhu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tak kira indah sampai mana ... puak yg lebih ramai masuk adalah : bangla, paki, indon, arab ... negro dan india muslim pon ramai juga
manakala puak yg kulit cerah tak ramai, contoh nye : jerman, jepun, cina, korea dan omputih yg lain ... tak sampai 1% pon dr deols yg minat potong bebrid tukar nama arab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ada yg.kata tu batu meteorite, ada yg.kata batu akedThe nature of the Black Stone has been much debated. It has been described variously as basalt stone, an agate, a piece of natural glass or – most popularly – a stony meteorite. Paul Partsch [de], the curator of the Austro-Hungarian imperial collection of minerals, published the first comprehensive analysis of the Black Stone in 1857 in which he favoured a meteoritic origin for the Stone.[58] Robert Dietz and John McHone proposed in 1974 that the Black Stone was actually an agate, judging from its physical attributes and a report by an Arab geologist that the Stone contained clearly discernible diffusion banding characteristic of agates.[2]
A significant clue to its nature is provided by an account of the Stone's recovery in 951 CE after it had been stolen 21 years earlier; according to a chronicler, the Stone was identified by its ability to float in water. If this account is accurate, it would rule out the Black Stone being an agate, a basalt lava, or a stony meteorite, though it would be compatible with it being glass or pumice.[7]
Elsebeth Thomsen of the University of Copenhagen proposed a different hypothesis in 1980. She suggested that the Black Stone may be a glass fragment or impactite from the impact of a fragmented meteorite that fell 6,000 years ago at Wabar,[59] a site in the Rub' al Khali desert 1,100 km east of Mecca. A 2004 scientific analysis of the Wabar site suggests that the impact event happened much more recently than first thought and might have occurred within the last 200–300 years.[60]
The meteoritic hypothesis is viewed by geologists as doubtful. The British Natural History Museum suggests that it may be a pseudometeorite, in other words a terrestrial rock mistakenly attributed to a meteoritic origin.[61]
The Black Stone has never been analysed with modern scientific techniques and its origins remain the subject of speculation.[62] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Thread has been banned by manager
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apb kita tidak melihat keindahan pada sesuatu, itu lebih baik kerana kita akan terselamat untuk menyebut yg buruk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|