|
|
[Tempatan]
Mahkamah Rayuan Sahkan Penduduk Kampung Chubadak Bukan Setinggan
[Copy link]
|
|
|
TuntungReturn posted on 14-11-2014 03:50 PM 
x silap.aku ade akta tanah kate kerajaan bleh amik tanah utk kepentingan awam cm buat lebuhraya
mmg btol .. tapi kerajaan kena bg notis & dapatkan persetujuan tuan tanah gak. Kena bayar pampasan gak.
kalau atas kepentingan awam, pihak tuan tanah boleh protes atas dasar jumlah pampasan yg diberikan tu.
tapi dlm kes kg chubadak ni .. nampak mcm pemaju dah kawtim dgn dbkl. Ada yg poket penuh ni.
eloknye kalau Sprm pun siasat kes ni.
Last edited by waksir on 14-11-2014 04:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kecimpret posted on 14-11-2014 03:16 PM
The court today reinstated the suit by residents of the village which sought for proper compensati ...
lot 6 x 3 poong....tak adok gran
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
siDenan mano...sonyap ajo....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cuma dewan serbaguna saja dah dirobohkan sehingga kini |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kecimpret posted on 14-11-2014 03:16 PM
The court today reinstated the suit by residents of the village which sought for proper compensati ...
The Malaysian insider = bullshit
Tak ada rumah dirobohkan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the_killer posted on 14-11-2014 03:37 PM
Kampung Chubadak terletak berhampiran dengan bandar raya Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Berdasarkan seja ...
kira ade geran ler..cehhh..yg tuh konfom laa bkn setinggan..mmg pemilik sah tanah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
waksir posted on 14-11-2014 04:00 PM
mmg btol .. tapi kerajaan kena bg notis & dapatkan persetujuan tuan tanah gak. Kena bayar pampasan ...
sape duk bandar sri permaisuri kat sini?..sure tau kondo suasana lumayan yg tgh wat skg ni..projek JV DBKL dgn swasta..bape ramai komplen pasal staf amik duit undertable..harga launch 299k leh naik smp 300k+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nenek 2 punye pasal la makamah 2 bagi keputusan macam 2...hidup nenek... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ade lg satu court. so dbkl masih blh appeal. tp last la.
i dont understand mcm mn tanpa geran they still manage to win. kalau mereka ade lesen pendudukan sementara, lesen tu blh dibatalkan anytime. errmmm i shld read the whole judgment.
@lindarafee , ko ade follow ke kes ni? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kg setinggan india dan cina pun banyak kat Sentul nun....
lepas ni semua akan claim dah duduk situ sejak zaman Yap Ah Loi...
minang caprut boleh buat katanya..... aku tongkang hangpa tongkang gak...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kecimpret posted on 14-11-2014 03:16 PM
The court today reinstated the suit by residents of the village which sought for proper compensati ...
yang aku faham ini lah yang orang panggil tanah TOL (Temporary Occupancy License)
bukan owner bukan setinggan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kecimpret posted on 14-11-2014 05:33 PM
kira ade geran ler..cehhh..yg tuh konfom laa bkn setinggan..mmg pemilik sah tanah In July last year, the high court ruled that the villagers had no right to claim ownership over the land as they are “squatters” on state-owned land,
It cited a Federal Court ruling in 1982 that declared them as having no right either in law or equity.
mana ada geran? pandai jer ko...
high court ruling tahun lepas berpandukan Federal Court decision tahun 1982 lagi.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noraidil_06 posted on 15-11-2014 02:43 PM
ade lg satu court. so dbkl masih blh appeal. tp last la.
i dont understand mcm mn tanpa geran the ...
cuma kebenaran to re-instate their suit, belum 'menang' lagi.
sebelum ni kena dismiss cam tu jer at least sekarang mereka ada sedikit hak pampasan walau bukan sebagai owner, at least sebagai orang yang pernah berkuntum di situ.
benda ni sepatutnya boleh bagi on humanitarian ground tapi ofkos lah depa nak lebih so fight lah...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decaffeinated posted on 15-11-2014 03:25 PM
cuma kebenaran to re-instate their suit, belum 'menang' lagi.
sebelum ni kena dismiss cam tu je ...
oooo re-instate je ke? i ingat menang dah. i x ikut sgt kes ni. i m not a fan of people claiming other peoples' land just because u stay there like forever. mcm indon yg duduk atas tanah pak mertua i. kite bg duduk out of pity, now dia x mo keluar. so pak mertua i, bg la some portion to him. sama la dgn kes ni.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kecimpret posted on 14-11-2014 05:33 PM
kira ade geran ler..cehhh..yg tuh konfom laa bkn setinggan..mmg pemilik sah tanah
ape yg i bc dr artikel kt first page, x de geran, ade lesen pendudukan je. lesen pendudukan bukan auto renew & blh dibatalkan anytime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noraidil_06 posted on 15-11-2014 03:30 PM
oooo re-instate je ke? i ingat menang dah. i x ikut sgt kes ni. i m not a fan of people claiming o ...
kita pun based on apa yg reporter tu tulis lah....
bukan follow the case....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noraidil_06 posted on 15-11-2014 03:34 PM
ape yg i bc dr artikel kt first page, x de geran, ade lesen pendudukan je. lesen pendudukan bukan ...
TOL.....mmg bukan geran penuh..cuma kebenaran duduk....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noraidil_06 posted on 15-11-2014 03:30 PM
oooo re-instate je ke? i ingat menang dah. i x ikut sgt kes ni. i m not a fan of people claiming o ...
bagi portion? halau je la...indon tu kan bukan warga negara? x pun suh dia bayar kawasan tanah dia duduk tu...nanti bila dah jadi pesaka..payah la mau halau/deal....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
razhar posted on 15-11-2014 04:26 PM
bagi portion? halau je la...indon tu kan bukan warga negara? x pun suh dia bayar kawasan tanah dia ...
Dah bg pun.my pil mls nk gaduh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
noraidil_06 posted on 15-11-2014 07:56 PM
Dah bg pun.my pil mls nk gaduh
baik PIL lu buat pagar kawasan dia secepat mungkin...tapi lanun tu ambik sikit..sikit...anak cucu juga yang sakit nak reclaim balik oooo... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 14-11-2014 04:00 PM
![Menjengah kehidupan baru Shuhada di OZ [siri pembongkaran acik forum kembali bersiaran]](https://uf.cari.com.my/forumx/mforum/block/da/da339e542879ef07fe6217b4f2bd30d4.jpg)
