MIND YOUR LANGUAGE...Practice Makes Perfect

seribulan

on= atas, onto= ke atas...beza onto ni ada pergerakan...on ni statik/setempat biasanya...

the book is on the table

put the book onto the table

into pun cam tu gak...= ke dalam.. ada movement...

the water is in the cup

pour the water into the cup

at ni...tempat pun boleh masa pun boleh...

i was at home at 5 p.m yesterday

...nanti add more...

mbhcsf

mcm mane dgn phrase ini.
get on with it..
bring it on ( David Duchovny fave  quotes ( MULDER I mean))
come on
trn ....
depends on..
bsed on
later on
go on...
yg preposition mcm ni lah org confuse  sbb tulah my secondary englisgh teacher said the only way is to read a lot of books and magazines articles ..story books...

p/s: invitn dah tengok the last 1/2 an hour???

seribulan

tengok konteks ayat, baru boleh tahu makna,

get on with it= mulakan/laksanakan      turn on : tergoda/bernafsu
depends on=bergantung       based on= berasaskan
bring it on = bawa/ sebabkan    come on = ayuh/moh/jom
later on = kemudian    go on=teruskan

mbhcsf

bless you seribulan..
so sesiapa yg nak tanya lagi boleh lah tanya jangan malu.ini ilmu..

[ Last edited by mbhcsf on 18-7-2003 at 09:30 PM ]

seribulan

feel free....sifu dah balik...hopefully....nyeh...nyeh...nyeh...

mbhcsf

depa tak mau tanya ..kit atanya keep you in the job...
cuba cerita bagi / could you please tell us abit more about the usage of


1) MAY
2) can
3) could

ni basic ye...
kalau sesiapa lain dr La lLuna pun boleh jugak....
cuba ajaq basic sure ade jugak org dapat manfaat ..

seribulan

ni namanya MODAL atau AUXILLIARY VERBS...

may = mungkin(sesuatu tak pasti)

I may die tomorrow.

can= boleh(mampu)
could= past tense can..

I can die today.
I could die yesterday.

mbhcsf

where are you...
cari..where art thou....?...

seribulan

M...kursus kat kl lak..mengejut...sori ni..lepak kat ukm...nasib la ada cc hostel...
see u soon...

amorist

Originally posted by seribulan at 2003-7-3 02:19 PM:
yes...
not in the near future....:bg:

not in the near term

seribulan

correct ... tq ..myamor...

fly_in_d_sky

i'm always mix up with had n has .. then word of these ... can u give me some example ....

seribulan

these is plural for this..

e.g these are your books.
     this is your book.

cam those plural for that...

had past tense for has

e.g today i has two books. yesterday i had one book only.

past participle menggunakan had or has

e.g I had opened your book.
     She has opened your book yesterday.

biasanya, when you used 'had', the time is usually not stated..'Has' had the time stated.

understand...

Amir

Originally posted by seribulan at 2003-7-31 12:47 PM:
these is plural for this..

e.g these are your books.
     this is your book.

cam those plural for that...

had past tense for has

e.g today i has two books. yesterday i had one book onl ...

Salam,

Betul ke tu,Seri? Cuba check balik.

Wassalam.

fly_in_d_sky

Originally posted by seribulan at 31-7-2003 12:47 PM:
these is plural for this..

e.g these are your books.
     this is your book.

cam those plural for that...

had past tense for has

e.g today i has two books. yesterday i had one book onl ...

tpkan cikgu seribulan .... what about using for day .....
what's the different between these days or this days?

seribulan

these days...la
this days is incorrect...

fly_in_d_sky

tima kasih cikgu .....
cikgu, cikgu ... cikgu nampak lawo ari nie ... yer la dah guna avatar lain ...

mbhcsf

Originally posted by seribulan at 2003-7-6 00:06:
Reptile or amphibia????;)

reptile..yes.. i prefer reptile..hiss..shisss...hiccups...hic..cc..cups..:bg::bg:
bless you :bg:

seribulan

Originally posted by fly_in_d_sky at 2-8-2003 02:54 PM:
tima kasih cikgu .....
cikgu, cikgu ... cikgu nampak lawo ari nie ... yer la dah guna avatar lain ...

tq.....tak tidoq sampai pagi ni......

fly_in_d_sky

Originally posted by seribulan at 3-8-2003 02:48 AM:
tq.....tak tidoq sampai pagi ni......

la .. tak tidoq sampai pagi? buat pa? tanda buku latihan murid2 ker?
pi la tidoq ...