|
Demonstrasi Jalanan Paling Besar di Malaysia. Siapa akan pergi?
[Copy link]
|
|
Crackdown on Bersih sets alarm bells ringing abroad
Stephanie Sta Maria | July 2, 2011
The international community is taken aback by Malaysia's insistence on stopping the Bersih rally.
PETALING JAYA: The Malaysian government’s vehement opposition to the Bersih 2.0 rally has the international community reeling in alarm and bewilderment over the “uncharacteristic behaviour” of a “moderate, progressive country”.
The Human Rights Watch (HRW) noted that Malaysia has always been perceived as a reasonable country that welcomes dialogue and negotiation.
But the government’s severe crackdown on rally organisers and supporters have now run contrary to this sentiment and is likely to tarnish Malaysia’s reputation within the United Nations Human Rights Council.
HRW’s deputy director for Asia, Phil Robertson, said that none of Bersih’s demands has warranted the spate of arrests, threats of Internal Security Act (ISA) or bringing out the army on July 9.
“For some reason the Malaysian government has decided to make this rally a test of its power,” Robertson told FMT. “It almost seems like it has a screw loose. It’s very clear that this is a campaign of intimidation.”
“I have heard that a number of foreign diplomats have attempted to pacify the Malaysian government, but the exact details of those talks have been kept confidential.”
“Malaysia is in fact bound by Article 21 of the United Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) to allow this rally. Bersih is asserting its right under Article 21 and that right should be respected.”
Article 21 states that “the will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of the government: this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures”.
Robertson also dismissed accusations that Bersih is politically motivated due to the support by opposition parties. He stressed that even a member of a political party still has the rights of a citizen.
“The issue here is freedom of peaceful assembly,” he said. “If a NGO and a political party decide to walk hand-in-hand, that is their right. The government is just churning out excuse after excuse to stop the rally in the hope that the people will believe at least one of them.”
Thailand is not the bogeyman
The Bangkok-based Robertson also defended Thailand against the Election Commission’s (EC) portrayal of the country as one that is mired in chaos because “people are campaigning for one rejected leader”.
EC deputy chairman, Wan Ahmad Wan Omar, had made this earlier remark to draw parallels between Thai support for ousted prime minister, Thaksin Shinawatra, and Bersih’s alleged support for opposition leader, Anwar Ibrahim.
Thailand goes to the polls tomorrow in its 26th general election but Robertson assured that no chaos or violence is expected.
“Malaysia is fond of painting Thailand as the bogeyman which isn’t credible at all,” he said. “The reality is that Thais broadly believe that the country’s electoral procedures are actually good.”
“They believe that when their names are at their polling booths, the confidentiality of their votes will be maintained; they are able to complain if their names are missing and there won’t be any electoral violations like the stuffing of ballot boxes at the eleventh hour.”
He added that Thailand has since invited international observers to monitor its elections. Among these observers are the Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) and EC chairman, Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof.
Aziz revealed last night that the EC too is looking into the possibility of inviting international observers for the 13th general election. His statement has been met with both support and opposition but the international community is inclined to applaud it.
“It isn’t unusual for international election monitoring to take place,” Robertson said. “Confidence in the electoral process is fundamental to any functioning democracy. If people believe the election process is unfair, then that perception will pemeate every other aspect of the country.”
donia kondem umngok bangsat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply 861# ChildrenOfBodom
dunia komunis mesti bangga |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply 861# ChildrenOfBodom
Orang putih ni pedulik hape kalau Malaysia huru-hara. Malaysia huru-hara dia ada kerja.
Yang bodoh je memuja2 omputeh ni. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hehehe tapi nnt kalau omputeh bwk keluar senarai negara paling baguih ada melesia tersenarai media2 penjilat umngok gak dok ulang siar sampai 80 kali,..prfghhhhhhhhhhht |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hidop demostrasi ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,street for life...rock bebeh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/ ... rg6zo-1225998985002
The collapse of political Islamic moderation, from the Middle East to Pakistan to Turkey, is profoundly disturbing. However, there is one region which is a serious exception, Southeast Asia.
The two most democratic nations in Southeast Asia are its two big Muslim-majority nations, Indonesia and Malaysia. This may seem unfair to Thailand and The Philippines. But in Thailand there are too many coups, and in The Philippines too many journalists are killed, there are too many private militias and too many insurgencies.
Malaysia is not a perfect democracy. The opposition doesn't get a fair shake from the media. But its elections are clean and several of its state governments are controlled by opposition parties.
Above all, both Indonesia and Malaysia are legitimate nations with legitimate governments. If the people don't like their governments, they are more likely to try to change them at the ballot box than by riots.
East Asian regionalism has had a very good effect on these two nations because it has emphasised economic growth, whereas Middle East regionalism has reinforced autocracy and sterile religio-political rhetoric against Israel.
Last week I had a long discussion with Malaysia's formidable Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak.
I asked him how it was that Malaysia had so comprehensively avoided acts of Islamist terror. He replied: "I like to think it's more than divine intervention. I think it's partly historical and partly it's our policy and our very proactive actions.
"From the historical perspective, the coming of Islam to this part of the world has never been associated with violence. It was always a peaceful conversion to Islam.
"Second, the way we have interpreted Islam, and applied Islam in a very moderate and progressive way. I would even call it an enlightened way. Islam is seen here as a religion of peace and understanding and able to relate to other religions. We've been able to put in place policies which allow the peaceful coexistence of other religions in this country."
Malaysia has substantial oil wealth, like many nations in the Middle East. But it has not rested on that resource. It has always pursued an open and diverse economy, and this has become a part of its national identity as well as its economic policy.
Says Najib: "I believe that Malaysia, indeed any society, to prosper should be open and should be fully engaged with the global economy."
Malaysia survived the global financial crisis remarkably well. Najib offers three reasons for this: a robust and well regulated banking system; an extremely large stimulus package; and a diverse economy such that when manufacturing fell it was compensated by commodities rising.
Sound familiar?
It is a singular good fortune of Australia that our Muslim neighbours are two legitimate, practical minded states, focused on economic development in a broadly successful region. Indonesia and Malaysia could not be less like the states of the Middle East, though developments there will affect them too, which is one of the many reasons the roiling tumult in the Arab world is our business too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kim Jong Il nak melawat najib.... ...nak buat satu pakatan....
freebird Post at 2-7-2011 16:46
dia mesti nak jumpa ahkak ros gak.... most powerful lady |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysia is not a perfect democracy. The opposition doesn't get a fair shake from the media. But its elections are clean and several of its state governments are controlled by opposition parties.
Above all, both Indonesia and Malaysia are legitimate nations with legitimate governments. If the people don't like their governments, they are more likely to try to change them at the ballot box than by riots.
Magika Post at 2-7-2011 16:56
setuju dgn omputeh ni! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sapa suke dok berdemo ni? mostly budak2 hingusan cam totok dan anak tukiran
pasai pa depa suka?
pasal depa suke buang masa keje tak pekdah
bung karno kata, Beri saya 10 PEMUDA dan akan saya gegarkan donya'
bung anwar plak kata, Beri saya 10 kopi boys dan saya akan gegarkan katil hotel
ada tok menteri kata di mesia 75 percent rakyat or ppln adalah berumur 25 ke bawah, makna yang tua tanggung yang muda yang lebih ramai dari yang tua or greying
di negara maju yang depa KUNUN nak tiru kebajikan dan civilised katanya tu, mostly greying, yang tua tu lagi ramai dari yang muda , sebab tu demo depa tu demo civilised, yang dok buat onar pun soang dua anak muda terlebih ganja hahaha
bila negara terlalu ramai anak muda, depa ni seme darah panas, cepat rebel or berontak, dapat upah skit apa pun sanggup esp kasik pompuan hiburan dadah etc..asik nak suka2, maka mudah jadi masalah, bila dah terlalu ramai mmg sukar nak bendung..tgk je indonesia
yang tua2 jadi PENGHASUT..tu yang kene dakwa sumbat je lam ISA
budak muda ni kan leh fikir..apa masa tu dia nampak besh dia tibai jek..bukan pk untuk 20 taun akan datang cam oang tua , tenguk je cam budak wardina tu..walo anak dah dua otak lom matang pun
maybe ramai tak tau cara camna boleh guna PROPAGANDA untuk keldaikan ANAK MUDA baik lelaki dan pompuan untuk tujuan BERKUASA..culture revolution mao tse dung tu contoh paling baik untuk di baca, dah banyak dokumen pasal ni i think tak ramai pikir kut
memang bleh kata gomen pun keldaikan anak muda untuk terus berkuasa! memang ler saya pun tak nafikan, bukan saya bongok cam hangpa nak nafikan tuh
tapi kalo oang ajak makan taikkkkk tak kire oang tu dari pihak mana, pakaian camna, bahasa bangsa apa..takkan kita nak ikut kut? bodoh lah kan? tu yang kene bina SELF DEVELOPMENT walo masih muda tapi pikiran jauh matang rasional , BIJAK MEMILIH dan bezakan mana elok mana tak elok..ni yang terlalu kureng walo dalam porem nih esp di kalangan orang muda..kalo bab mengeseks lajuuuuuuuuu jek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sapa suke dok berdemo ni? mostly budak2 hingusan cam totok dan anak tukiran
pasai pa depa suka?
pasal depa suke buang masa keje tak pekdah
bung karno kata, Beri saya 10 PEMUDA dan akan saya gegarkan donya'
bung anwar plak kata, Beri saya 10 kopi boys dan saya akan gegarkan katil hotel
ajinomotonosuga Post at 2-7-2011 17:18
bergegarrrr!! haha! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
setuju dgn omputeh ni!
kasmela Post at 2-7-2011 17:04
Mcm sial jer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
demo paling haram jadah pernah aku saksikan selama aku jadi insan atas muka bumi allah taala ni
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bodo betul puak2 yg tak paham bahawa demonstrasi/tunjuk perasaan itu adalah fitrah semulajadi manusia.
anak kecik, tak payah diajar pun.... bila ada sesuatu yg tak puashati dlm dirinya....akan tunjuk perasaan dgn cara menarik perhatian org lain melalui hentak2 kaki, jerit kuat2, menangis.
dalam Islam sendiri, amalan2 ibadah pun ada yg jenis2 demonstrasi....seperti melontar jamrah, saie, tawaf..... tu semua adalah demonstrasi dari dalaman diri memasing....... tapi puak2 UMNO bodo lemah IQ ni, depa paham ibadah2 tu sebagai ritual semata2 takdak maksud apa2 pun.....Bodoh nak buat camne.
yg diperlukan adalah demonstrasi secara aman..... yg terkawal...yg bertanggungjawab.
tapi puak2 kaki maksiat UMNO lahanat ni, kalau bab naluri nak berhibur, cepat je kata kenapa nak haramkan konsert artis.... itu naluri manusia, tak patut dihalang...patut dibenarkan.... walaupun jelas konsert2 celaka macam ni meruntuhkan akhlak, menggalakkan maksiat. Tapi maksiat punya pasal, boleh saja.
tu dia double standard UMNO BN lemah IQ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...laaa...tinggal yang tua-tua kerepot je ke??
yang muda comel lote sokong par ...
freebird Post at 2-7-2011 18:40
kalo yg laki comel lote tuh dah jadik gundik bung nuar dalam pkr dah.. bang freebird seb baik dah terlajak umur sket kalo tak dah buleh la merase penangan batang pelir besar kat dalam lubang dubur.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
demo paling haram jadah pernah aku saksikan selama aku jadi insan atas muka bumi allah taala ni ...
kucingTomey Post at 2-7-2011 18:25
ko jgn laa kutuk macit2 tuh....dewrang kene paksa laa.....orang kampung lain pemikiran.....mak2 sedara aku kat kampung selalu kene angkut pegi rombongan naik bas satu kampung kalo ada function pemimpin umno....baru2 nih abis golongan emas kampung aku diangkut pegi kelantan.......dewrang dah ada orang nak sapot gi jenjalan percuma just bawak duit nak belanja beli barang jer sape xnak....siap dapat duit poket utk makan lagi tuh......sunyi 2-3 hari kampung aku dari golongan macit2 tym tuh... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/ ... rg6zo-1225998985002
The collapse of political Islamic moderation, from the Middle East to Pakistan to Turkey, is profoundly disturbing. However, there is one region which is a serious exception, Southeast Asia.
The two most democratic nations in Southeast Asia are its two big Muslim-majority nations, Indonesia and Malaysia. This may seem unfair to Thailand and The Philippines. But in Thailand there are too many coups, and in The Philippines too many journalists are killed, there are too many private militias and too many insurgencies.
Malaysia is not a perfect democracy. The opposition doesn't get a fair shake from the media. But its elections are clean and several of its state governments are controlled by opposition parties.
Above all, both Indonesia and Malaysia are legitimate nations with legitimate governments. If the people don't like their governments, they are more likely to try to change them at the ballot box than by riots.
East Asian regionalism has had a very good effect on these two nations because it has emphasised economic growth, whereas Middle East regionalism has reinforced autocracy and sterile religio-political rhetoric against Israel.
Last week I had a long discussion with Malaysia's formidable Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak.
I asked him how it was that Malaysia had so comprehensively avoided acts of Islamist terror. He replied: "I like to think it's more than divine intervention. I think it's partly historical and partly it's our policy and our very proactive actions.
"From the historical perspective, the coming of Islam to this part of the world has never been associated with violence. It was always a peaceful conversion to Islam.
"Second, the way we have interpreted Islam, and applied Islam in a very moderate and progressive way. I would even call it an enlightened way. Islam is seen here as a religion of peace and understanding and able to relate to other religions. We've been able to put in place policies which allow the peaceful coexistence of other religions in this country."
Malaysia has substantial oil wealth, like many nations in the Middle East. But it has not rested on that resource. It has always pursued an open and diverse economy, and this has become a part of its national identity as well as its economic policy.
Says Najib: "I believe that Malaysia, indeed any society, to prosper should be open and should be fully engaged with the global economy."
Malaysia survived the global financial crisis remarkably well. Najib offers three reasons for this: a robust and well regulated banking system; an extremely large stimulus package; and a diverse economy such that when manufacturing fell it was compensated by commodities rising.
Sound familiar?
It is a singular good fortune of Australia that our Muslim neighbours are two legitimate, practical minded states, focused on economic development in a broadly successful region. Indonesia and Malaysia could not be less like the states of the Middle East, though developments there will affect them too, which is one of the many reasons the roiling tumult in the Arab world is our business too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|