CARI Infonet

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

Author: greekgod

Debmey, me, truth8., nightlord, divine: A Bible Contradiction

[Copy link]
Post time 13-4-2005 03:14 AM | Show all posts
So dya all agree with the theologians & historians about this or still cannot accept this fact or still undecided yet???? once again they are not simply commented  in that way just for fun....logically they are well aware the consequences that can occur just bcoz of this comments!


Think about it.....


Allah Knows Best,Peace Yall
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 13-4-2005 09:07 AM | Show all posts
No, as far as the NIV hist. and theo. are concern, they consider the bible is the word of God.

So whats your problem?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 13-4-2005 05:26 PM | Show all posts
But why they dare to comment like that if they believe it's a word of god???? now that remained mysterious....wasn't their comment will give a big blow to their religion and their so called holly book?????

I ask u PonyTail dya dare to put a comment like that just for fun without numerous years of research????? Why don't u send an email or a mail to NIV team and ask the same thing like i ask u here...


:ah: :ah:


Allah Knows Best,Peace Yall....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 13-4-2005 08:58 PM | Show all posts
WE CAN ONLY MARVEL AT THE SUPERINTENDING INFLUENCE OF THE LORD HIMSELF, who assures US that "ALL SCRIPTURE IS GOD-BREATHED" and that THE MEN WHO WROTE IT "SPOKE FROM GOD as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit". (NIV Study Bible, Commentary on Genesis, pg. 4)
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-4-2005 11:55 AM | Show all posts
How can the bible comes from god if their followers itself say it was added & edited by humans like the theologist & historian from the NIV team???? will they comment that just for fun without any deep research?????

:hmm:


Allah Knows Best,Peace Yall.....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 15-4-2005 10:12 PM | Show all posts
yes,i agree with you A7.

why is only DVP is the one answering?

where's Debmey,ME,nightlord?
I think they chickened out already as a proof that they can defend their religions.
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
Post time 15-4-2005 10:20 PM | Show all posts
Originally posted by DivinePonytail at 10-4-2005 10:46 AM:
Well, I see anenemy7 and wira_melayu think themself more clever than the NIV Theo and Hist.


You are flattering me!:malu:

I think that the NIV theo and hist are enforcing their fantasy on you peoples.If it is the word of god,the bible will remain intact forever but when the bible itself cannot come to terms with today society they edit and edit again.:
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 16-4-2005 12:29 AM | Show all posts
What good are the words of God if people cannot understand Him?

Read the whole commentary, understand what they actually means about "added or edited".
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 16-4-2005 08:33 PM | Show all posts
the word "added & edited" tells it all, don't u all suprise this words coming from a christian researcher themselves???? how can a believer say their holy scripture was "added & edited"???? Wasn't this an insult to their own beliefs????

: : :



Allah Knows Best,Peace Yall.....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-4-2005 03:08 AM | Show all posts
Wow no answer yet....so u all agree the bible already being added and edited?? dya agree with the theologist and historians??? bare in mind, Islam already say about it,wasn't the glorious quran right about this and in line with the theologist & historian view about it???

:lol



Allah Knows Best,Peace Yall....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-4-2005 05:33 PM | Show all posts
Hmmmmm.....


:hmm: :hmm: :hmm:
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-4-2005 05:43 PM | Show all posts
Have you read the whole NIV commentary?

Read it, and come back here.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-4-2005 05:47 PM | Show all posts
Why read if the theologist and historian already said that "added and edited" thing in their NIV???? and the Glorious Quran already said about this a long time ago! wasn't it inline with the modern day theologist & historian research about it?????


:lol



Allah Knows Best,Peace Yall.....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-4-2005 05:52 PM | Show all posts
So thats all you've read? only ONE sentence?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-4-2005 05:58 PM | Show all posts
That Sentence is enough to tell non-bible specialist about the whole thing, for Muslims it was already told about the distortion made by the people of the book and suddenly the bible theologist & historian also say about this again, wasn't it a miracle, a bible follower say something like that in their own bible????

:cak:



Allah Knows Best,Peace Yall.....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 21-4-2005 10:13 PM | Show all posts
To draw conclusion just from one sentence show how shallow your mind is. Why not open your mind and read the rest of the commentary?
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 23-4-2005 03:05 AM | Show all posts
But still the highlight was "added & edited" right?????:lol, even u read the whole thing u still cannot forgot that sentence right coz the sentence was enough to tell the whole thing! i repeat the whole thing.... straightforward and bold!!!!!!

Simple mate.....:lol



Allah Knows Best,Peace Yall.....
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 23-4-2005 08:24 AM | Show all posts
I read the quran, I can easily tell its fake after readinga few pages, and I laughed.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 23-4-2005 10:47 AM | Show all posts
Because you are stupid enough to not understand the beauty of Qur'an. Opinion of saying Qur'an is a fake is purely a personal matter.

Just dump the commentary. See the Introduction (or foreword) in NIV and KGV BIbles. It stated that the source of from these were written is quite "anonymous".

At least, Muslim has proved that the Qur'an is still and will be intact, as opposed to Bible.

I have posted before, that the Vatican itself prefer revision and addtion moreover than to preserve the original context of the Bible. I too, have posted the "grades of Biblical source", prepared by the Vatican for use of Biblical revision, as a standard de facto. Sadly, there was no agreeable source.

Well, other religion are striving to preserve the original context of their Scripture, so source of present and future translations and commentary could be secures. Hindu (that being thousand of years earlier than Christianity), Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism, B'ahai... their religious scriptures could still be observed in their revealed (original) language.

If your source is arguable, then the possibility of your Scripture could be tainted is very high. If, let's say your Scripture is confidential enough to be *not a fake*, on what source  you all say as such? There are no standard or reference to make.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 15-5-2005 02:52 PM | Show all posts
So the conclusion is.........errrrrr :lol :lol :lol


Allah Knows Best,Peace Yall.....
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT



 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CARI Infonet

8-5-2024 07:19 AM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.056982 second(s), 42 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list