CARI Infonet

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

Author: eastrun

A Convenant that never happened

[Copy link]
Post time 2-3-2007 12:46 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by Debmey at 2-3-2007 12:35 AM
Absolutely. The ark rested on the mountains of ararat, not mt.Ararat itself.
You prove me point. Thank you.


Below is your question - and who is the person who wrote mt.ararat ?

kharrr  kharrr  kharrrr

QUOTE:
Even the Quranic version of where the final resting place ofNoah arcwhich is Mt Judi has been described by scientists as more accuratethanMt Ararat as most people believed..

Wrong, the Bible did not say the ark rested on mt.ararat itself. Shows younever read the Bible yourself.
The location ofmt.judi itself is confusing.
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 2-3-2007 07:57 AM | Show all posts
read carefully.

The Bible said mountains of ararat, not mount ararat. Yu are the one in error buddy. Ahahahahahahaha................

cheers
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-3-2007 10:04 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by Debmey at 2-3-2007 07:57 AM
read carefully.

The Bible said mountains of ararat, not mount ararat. Yu are the one in error buddy. Ahahahahahahaha................

cheers



Show us where did I wrote " mount ararat " ?

kharrrr   kharrrr   kharrrrr   kharrrrr
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-3-2007 10:41 AM | Show all posts
so you do agree that the bible wrote 'mountains of ararrat'. good for you.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 2-3-2007 10:59 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by Debmey at 2-3-2007 10:41 AM
so you do agree that the bible wrote 'mountains of ararrat'. good for you.



So you agree that bible did say the ark rested on mountains of ararat ?

kharrr   kharrr   kharrrrr


Wrong, the Bible did not say the ark rested on mt.ararat itself. Shows you never read the Bible yourself.
The location ofmt.judi itself is confusing.
Reply

Use magic Report

pooja_1 This user has been deleted
Post time 2-3-2007 11:19 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by Debmey at 1-3-2007 11:27 PM
whats your point? So what if you know how many mountains are in the mountain range?


To know exactly where Ararat is located.

peace.
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
Post time 2-3-2007 01:32 PM | Show all posts
the location of mount ararat is already known.
Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 2-3-2007 09:16 PM | Show all posts

Reply #107 Debmey's post

Where is it located..

Before this I did asked you...show me an article where the Muslims claimed the mountains are Mount Judi after they found an ark on it...Until now you are not able to do so...
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Iman_6 This user has been deleted
Post time 3-3-2007 02:08 PM | Show all posts
Originally posted by Debmey at 2-3-2007 01:32 PM
the location of mount ararat is already known.



There are two peaks in question. One is on the peak of Mt Ararat and the other on the peak of Mt Judi.
So archeological findings had weighed more evidence on Mt Judi.

I stand by my statement that the interpretion in the Quran , that the flood was localised as being stated by many learned muslims.
If Debmey wants to argue based on biblical evidences, many are just pure myths.


TQ. This will be my last post in this thread.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 3-3-2007 04:18 PM | Show all posts
really? where in the Quran did it say that the flood was localised? please show us.
Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 4-3-2007 11:10 AM | Show all posts

Reply #110 Debmey's post

Like I said before, the flood can be localised or not, because the Holy Quran didn't mentioned about it clearly. So, whether we (Muslims) whether it was localised or not...Both can be acceptable.

Because the most important thing is the moral of the story.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 5-3-2007 01:24 AM | Show all posts
but iman6 says that the quran interpretation is that it was localised. please show us if that is so.
Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 7-3-2007 11:04 PM | Show all posts

Reply #112 Debmey's post

If Iman said that, he also right.Because the flood was either LOCALISED OR NOT.So, he can intepret that.Like I said.The more important thing is the moral of the story.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 7-3-2007 11:10 PM | Show all posts
So why did he interpret it that way? What is teh basis of the interpretation?
Reply

Use magic Report

 Author| Post time 24-3-2007 11:32 PM | Show all posts
Like I said, the Holy Quran whether the flood is localised or not,BUT you don't have to worry about the flood, Allah tried to tell us the lesson from the punishment He gave to the people of Noah.He is not asking you to debate about flood.So, either you or Iman, not wrong about the location or how big the flood was. Allah knows best.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 26-3-2007 12:18 PM | Show all posts
geologists do recognise a worldwide flood, so the quran must be wrong.
if indeed muslims do believe that the ark rested on mt.cudi, then the flood cannot be localised can it?
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


 Author| Post time 26-3-2007 07:02 PM | Show all posts

Reply #116 Debmey's post

The Quran doesn't wrong because it doesn't make commentary about how big the flood and whether it is localised or not. So, how can you say Quran is wrong?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 27-3-2007 12:58 AM | Show all posts
Originally posted by eastrun at 26-3-2007 07:02 PM
The Quran doesn't wrong because it doesn't make commentary about how big the flood and whether it is localised or not. So, how can you say Quran is wrong?






kharrrr   kharrrr   kharrrrr
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT



 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CariDotMy

11-5-2024 02:09 AM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.834545 second(s), 39 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list