Israel may get F-22s if nation at risk

IceMallet

I tot the Dubuk only tadah pungkok to the white men? the Dubuk also tadah pungkok to the Yids also ka?

mentosonline

No. Check Wikipedia.

Foreign Aid 2006 was 240 Million US.
It has been steadily reduced from about US$1-2 billion since the mid 1990s.

Debmey

Originally posted by IceMallet at 4-5-2007 08:04 AM
I tot the Dubuk only tadah pungkok to the white men? the Dubuk also tadah pungkok to the Yids also ka?

sorry sir, I don't bow down to white men 5 times a day.

mentosonline

Remember the time Singapore had a Jewish Chief Minister...
He was even more anti-colonialistic than the communists.

Debmey

Thats why we like Jews. Jews are good people.
We will never forget our Jewish brothers who helped us so much thorugh the years. They will always be a friend of Singapore.

huskers

we are also your good friend...we provide you with water, fresh food (vege, pork, fish, meat etc) - the basic things to stay alive...... not to mention the basic building material (sand, cement) so you can have a nice cozy hdb flat to live in.
don't u consider us a very good friend debmey.

Debmey

You greedy pigs did it for money. And you tried to break contract and cut off our supply of water whom we pay good money for remember? We will never forget that.

mentosonline

Sand sales is banned to Singapore and any other country.
Singapore bans pork from Malaysia because of Nipah virus risk, so all pork comes from Aussie now.
Fish we got some from our own fish farm, some from Msia and some from Indonesia.
Vegetables is the most dependent thing we need from Msia right now.
As for Water, our own Straits Times has labelled Newater as a means of freedom from any Msia political influence.
At least, soon it will be so Msia can't use it as a bargaining card for concessions.

IceMallet

U guys are so kiasu..we already sell water at cheap rate..be thankful la..dun know why u need all that water, since u dun shower and dun basuh ur pungkok after taking a dump..and we also will never forget that la..next time, we break open the water pipes la

Debmey

you greedy kiasu! how can it be cheap when it costs you nothing?

IceMallet

U stupid fat kiasu..u think water pipes are free ka?..Also cost of pumping water from river into water pipes..

Debmey

we already paid for all those you greedy pig!

IceMallet

Yeah rite!! Dun make up stories la u fat greedy ghey kiasu

rurouni_khairul

Originally posted by Debmey at 4-5-2007 09:33 AM


sorry sir, I don't bow down to white men 5 times a day.

I thought you people are the one who worshiped a man impaled on a cross?

IceMallet

Dear Mod, the Dubuk does not worshipped a man impaled on a cross, but the Dubuk worshipped the pungkok of white men, and occasionally black ones also, not juts worshipping, the Dubuk also likes to lick them too

mentosonline

As i recall, Malaysia complain that water price damn cheap. So Singapore started paying more from the 2sen per thousand gallon to about 30-60 sen (can't remember), when Singapore wasn't obliged to do so legally. And Malaysia went on to say not enough, must be 2 rm per 1000 gallon. Don't forget, we also supply water (treated) to JB.

mentosonline

When was Jesus white? Is it some myth of Islam?

IceMallet

Dah la korang ni..citer pasal yahudi nak dapatkan F22, korang citer pasal negara korang pulak...citer pasal air yg kitorang supply dgn harga murah sgt...dasar bongok tul org2 singapoh ni

rurouni_khairul

I never said Jesus is a white man, can't u read mys statement above?...get ur facts right next time sonny.

Ok..back with the topic guys.

mentosonline

Well, your tone seems to suggest so.

Anyway, to follow your suggestion to be back on topic, check this out from wiki on the FB-22:

In early 2002, Lockheed Martin began briefing the US Air Force on a modified bomber version of the F-22 Raptor fighter, featuring a delta wing, longer body and greater range and payload. This company-funded study of the FB-22, conducted during 2002, was an internally generated, proprietary study into the feasibility of making a derivative of the F-22. The FB-22 medium bomber is based on existing and planned capabilities of the F-22 fighter, a heritage that would limit development costs should the idea go into production. The medium bomber version of the F-22 would provide a relatively low cost and low risk approach for development of a high speed strike aircraft to carry a sufficient load to attack mobile targets. The FB-22 would act as a regional bomber, a role previously covered by the F-111.

The FB-22 differs from the original F-22 design significantly. A lengthened fuselage and larger delta wing provides greater fuel capacity for greater range, of some 1,600 miles, compared with the F-22's 600 miles. This also allows room for a larger internal weapons bay, better suiting long range attack missions and improved stealth. A possible change to the General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136 or the new F135, which was developed for the new F-35, engines would allow for a higher top-speed. One early FB-22 concept featured no tailplanes. Unlike the similar-looking X-44 MANTA, the FB-22 would rely on wing control surfaces and would likely have fixed engine nozzles as opposed to the variable geometry ‘thrust vectoring’ nozzles which enhance the F-22's maneuverability. The initial design envisioned a plane that could carry 24 Small Diameter Bombs (SDB), which weigh only 250 pounds. This was later increased to 30 SDBs. Using Global Positioning System guidance, the small bomb could be as lethal as a 2,000-pound bomb. A F-22 would carry eight SDBs.

Related research is currently being undertaken to develop a stealth ordnance pod and hardpoints. This would allow the F-22, and any aircraft it spawns to carry a far greater amount of ordnance than the internal bays alone, while still allowing the craft to maintain its stealth characteristics. These pods are intended to use stealth shaping, and carry ordnance internally. Opening to release the munitions, then discarding along with the hardpoints if the situation requires. Because of the work already done on the F-22, developing the FB-22 might cost about $5 billion to $7 billion – a fraction of the price for starting a bomber from scratch.

Opinions anyone?