View: 6158|Reply: 40
|
kenapa CPU clock masih bawah 4Ghz ?
[Copy link]
|
|
Reply 1# batmana
tak perlu terpengaruh dgn angka.. laju2 sangat hang bukan larat kejar pun... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
itu semua gimik dari depa...
skang ni diorang tumpu dekat bilangan core. sebab lagi efisen dari clock speed!...
PASTU TAHUN DEPAN TUMPU KAT CPU+GPU lak+power consumption!....
aku ada baca kat mana ntah 2-3 hari lepas yg cakap cores count war has ended. now both company shift thier main focus to lower the power consumption with CPU+GPU or APU Fusion for AMD! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
silicon limitation... wait for another substance to futher increase the GHz peh aku cakap omputih berabuk siut |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kalu dulu kita nampak perubahan ketara dari Pentium I, 100Mhz,200Mhz, pentium 2 300Mhz....... 1Ghz, pastu naik smpai 2Ghz kemudian 3Ghz..
skrg ada perubahan x ketara... clock speed sama tp keupayaan pprosesan data amat bbeza.. sbb ada penambahbaikan dlm byk aspek: fsb/hypertransport/qpi tech, L1/L2/L3 cache, bilangan core yg dfusekan... saiz die makin kecik...
proc makin laju, lg byk power= lg byk haba... going beyond 4Ghz perlukan voltage lbh besar, kalo ikut teknologi semasa.. akn produce lg byk haba.. mebi kalo diorang dah leh wat teknologi spy voltage tu kecik akn kuar kot yg lajusss tu...
lg 1, computing power skrg bkn stakat cpu jek.. dah tmasuk gpu skali.. gpu generasi br blh buat byk benda yg dulu2 cuma cpu yg buat.. so, ni pong leh jd sbb nape x nampak perubahan ketara dlm clock speed... |
Rate
-
1
View Rating Log
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cayalah...halimi.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skrg ada perubahan x ketara... clock speed sama tp keupayaan pprosesan data amat bbeza.. sbb ada ...
halimi78 Post at 18-10-2010 11:25
cayalahh... kena bagi tacang nie... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
skrg ada perubahan x ketara... clock speed sama tp keupayaan pprosesan data amat bbeza.. sbb ada ...
halimi78 Post at 18-10-2010 11:25
betui2..tq2.. komen yg bernas...
almk, sori...kite tkle bagi tacang... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu ... _Wars_Incoming.html
AMD: No Core Wars Incoming.
Core Wars Will Not Last - AMD
[10/17/2010 05:00 PM]
by Anton Shilov
Advanced Micro Devices said that there was no core wars incoming. Efficiency will be more important than core count in the coming years, according to the new chief technology officer of the server unit of AMD.
"There will come an end to the core-count wars. I won't put an exact date on it, but I don't myself expect to see 128 cores on a full-sized server die by the end of this decade. It is not unrealistic from a technology road map, but from a deployment road map, the power constraints that people expect [servers] to live in wouldn't be feasible for chips with that many cores," said Donald Newell, AMD's chief technology officer for servers, according to IDG News-Service.
It is possible to integrate 50 or more x86-compatible cores into single chip akin to Intel Corp's SCC. Unfortunately, simplistic cores cannot solve all today's tasks, as a result, it makes sense to use both simple stream cores as well as complex x86 processing engines. Once software makers learn how to most efficiently use heterogeneous multi-core chips, the market will face a major change.
"There is nothing to prevent us to put specific features on die that enable more efficient processing. So you should expect to see heterogenous architectures to emerge where we identify functions that are broadly useful but don't necessarily map into an instruction that you'd want to add directly into the x86 architecture," said Mr. Newell. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply 11# adie82
cpu no more core war...no more 3.4ghz above |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply 12# mycos79
mmm... utk sementara.... once bila software developer kuarkan byk2 software yg boleh utilize >4 core.. start balik la tu..
tp start thn depan rasanya diorang akn start perang integrated gpu... intel sandy beach vs AMD Ontario... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply 14# adie82
pasan ek... aku dah malas nak edit dah...
tp cam menarik gak bendalah tu... looks promising...
at least utk ganti intel grafik yg sedia ada nih.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tapi fusion macam lagi menarik! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply 16# adie82
yg fusion aku lom larat nak baca abes...
cuma sandy nampak lbh menarik bbanding yg dah implemen kat i5 nih..
takat low end grafik dah xyah pk dah... musti Nv pening pale pasnih...
AMD xde nak risau mana.. fusion dah ada.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
la... penat aku tempek artikel pasal fusion ari tu... ko tak baca??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply 18# adie82
x baca pong yg ko tepek tu...
dah taim ko tepek aku dah lama x masuk porem...
aku baca sambil2 ngan sandy jek... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
la... penat aku tempek artikel pasal fusion ari tu... ko tak baca???
adie82 Post at 20-10-2010 13:18
panjang sngt.. mana larat nk bace... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|