View: 4737|Reply: 12
|
Pilih Mana R-73 Archer Atau Python-4
[Copy link]
|
seCret_pOliCE This user has been deleted
|
PILIH MANA R-73 ARCHER, ATAU RAFAEL PYTHON-4
Saat ini hanya terdapat 2 produk rudal udara ke udara jarak dekat yang paling diperhitungkan. Yaitu Vympel R-73 Archer buatan Russia, dan Rafael Python-4 buatan Israel. Sedangkan AIM-9X masih belum bisa menandingi kemampuan kedua rudal beken tersebut.
Untuk lebih jelasnya bisa dilihat tabel dibawah:
http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q241/delisa_07/ARCHER%20VS%20PYTHON/R-73infosanddatas-1.jpg
Tulisan bold dalam warna merah adalah parameter penting untuk sebuah AAM. Disini R-73 memiliki kelebihan pada jarak tempuh, kemampuan maneuver, sistim penuntun serta offbore sight.
Semakin jauh jarak tempuh, semakin leluasa rudal menyergap lawan, dan semakin aman dari sergapan rudal lawan.
Semakin tinggi kemampuan maneuver, semakin besar pula kemampuan untuk menyergap lawan.
Sedangkan sudut offbore sight yang besar, akan memberikan 揳ngle of view |
Rate
-
1
View Rating Log
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
PanglimaGuntur This user has been deleted
|
mengapa saya enggak bisa mengundi pak.......
adakah kerana saya newbie amatur........... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
python is out of vote coz we can't have it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Python 5 is the latest weapon.
http://www.israeli-weapons.com/weapons/missile_systems/air_missiles/python/Python5.html
LOAL -> Backwards launching.
EO seeker can acquire low heat signature aircrafts such as UAVs, helos, CMs.
EO seeker, seeing a sharp image of a locked target, can home in on critical parts, not hottest parts.
Onboard computer is >100x that of the Python 4 in terms of computing power.
-> High ECCM capability
Speed - M4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The backwards-facing radar of a Flanker (do not exist yet) will have no chance against a Raptor. Perhaps an IRST will, but not such a weak radar. That is, if the truck-RCS Flanker somehow survives the BVR engagement.
Quoting F-15 pilots during the recent Red Flag, they claimed they acquired the Raptor visually, but instruments just refused to lock on to it. These claims may not have merit, but they are no different from the marketing sheets above.
[ Last edited by reinloch at 16-3-2007 08:54 AM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
er...better u put more choice like AIM-9..so and so.... but from here sure is R-73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah ... good articles posted. Realistically, Israeli products are a big "no-no". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
both look similiar...Python copy from Archer??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other IR missiles besides those mentioned above (we aren't limited to the R-73 only):
1. Iris-T
2. Mica IR
3. ASRAAM
4. PL-9
5. AAM-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our Migs and SUs can only fire AAMs of a certain make only. and at present scenario, i don't think our SUs will be firing even the Iris-T. they just can't.
similarly with our hornets. they simply cannot fire R73. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #11 ferryman2393's post
They could've been wired for the Mica IR for a true passive BVR capability. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|