|
|
National Treasure: Book of Secrets (Dec 2007)
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Belum tengok lagi...... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #41 HeavenLeigh's post
g la tgk..best tau... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dah tgk..
jalan cerita agak simple..clue itu ini..
ada part yg sepatutnya susah nak dapat tapi senang plak..
cth nak masuk white house(security takde ke??cctv,secret service?? takkan mudah je masuk)maybe filem je kot  .Nak pegi gold city pun mudah takde suprise samada bandar tu wujud or tidak..
org jahat cerita ni agak baik even dia tunjuk jahat ugut mak ben.Unsur komedi mmg mencuit hati la terutama si riley tu..
berbaloi gak tgk even action tu kurang berbanding yg 1st movie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jon voight punya humor is very good. i like.. tang rilley masuk kerete left hand drive and tangan dah ready nak genggam stereng tu abit OFF la.. how can la? dah tentu2 funny, but highly unrealistic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dah tgk..best..action ada, komedi ada... selamber giler masuk bilik queen kat buckingham palace nak cari klue..
[ Last edited by honey_jelly at 26-12-2007 11:33 AM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Watched it! It was ok i guess. From scale 1 to 10, i give it a 7.
The computer genius guy, Riley i saw him in Failure to Launch,
The movie starring Sarah Jessica Parker,
he's cute, kindda funny time when a girl approach him to sign the book before ending,
hilarious, but Nicholas Cage looked old,
not that suitable with his hottie wife (in the movie) Diane Krugler!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
haa...
nk nengok ke xmo..
my fwen ajak nengok... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEY GUYS...
well i first watched it on Dec 20th on DVD - that was to say pirated RM 5 mmg habis coz i could not see anything.. so today i went to klcc and managed to catch the 1:45 pm slot. And my oh my
i like the exchanges - meaning the conversations / script - good script - you could see the interaction between the casts was so natural plus the good acting by Voight and Kartel . Yep agreed with u guys that the character - Mr Riley Poole is featured to be more matured. The plotlines - quite simpler compare ( READ : less clue but more difficult even with few clues tu pun) to the First one - but MORE challenging - sebab they have to overcome the security barriers the Buckingham , and how to kidnap the president and now you all yg dah tengok could see, that Ben needed more helping hands / brains to decipher the clues.Acting wise - kudos. good.
Pasal apa i suka : well jawapannya ada dalam Da Vinci's code dan ada bebenda yg sesiapa peminat conspiracy theory suka. That is what attracted me to the movie.So sapa yg tetahu sikit sejarah pasal Mason ke aper aper could relate.boleh hayatilah.
Funny Scene : The Oval Office
Ben ( Cage ) : Oh Abby you have lost your gmother's earings
hhahaahaha....
can't wait the page 47.
[ Last edited by mbhcsf at 30-12-2007 05:25 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hmm...
|
I think watak Ben tu is depicted as someone who is really cool, using the brain, intelligent, philosophical, respect ladies ( kan depa Sacred feminine concept : Read Da Vinci's Code), very considerate - he likes the thrill of deciphering clues by clues but at last you'll see he placed human values / good values when it comes to crisis - in both movies - when he was torn between the treasure / fame or his friends' lives.. he will choose the latter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
esok aku g tgk r citer ni.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dah tgk cite nih
ok la.. not bad..
cuma better yg 1st punya dari yg 2nd nih
clue2 dia senang sangat
my bf said yg cite nih macam cerita komik one piece
macam ada seorg foromer tu cakap |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #51 pinkygurl's post
semalam aku tgk nT ngan warlords... antare dua ni aku suke g warlords....
nT susah nak cakap arr.. nak kate x best mmg ar best... but cam ko cakap gak arr pinky.... clue simple sangat... yg buat best sbb diorg nye care nak dapat kan clur tu dah makin canggih..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From 5 stars, aku bagi 3 1/2 je lar. Jalan cite boleh agak but action lebih best n menarik dari NT1. Pendek kata, mmg ada improvement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cuma aku tak faham, macam mana penemuan harta Indian tu dapat membersihkan nama Tom Gates? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #54 IceMallet's post
yup! aku pun nak tanyer soalan yg sama......aku confuse sikit kat part ni....anyone can clarify?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
maksudnya dapat membuktikan bahawa Thomas Gates bakar muka surat tu bukan sebab nak hapuskan nama dia dalam muka surat tu tapi utk menghilangkan peta harta karun pada muka surat tu.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #56 burning_ash's post
|
Leh la nak kata gitu, cuma jumpa harta karun tu, tak pulak leh nak jelaskan kenapa nama Tom Gates dalam senarai konspirator pembunuhan Lincoln..org leh kata, Tom Gates pun dalam senarai mereka yg nak cari harta tuh jugak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 25-12-2007 08:12 PM
