|
|
Industri Pertahanan Malaysia (Perkembangan dan Update) - PART 2
[Copy link]
|
|
|
windof posted on 23-4-2014 09:02 PM 
Kena ada dua2, network info centric capabilities dan juga senjata utk melengkapkan function network ...
Betul la tu...cuma bila info bagus, ramai2 le boleh bedal target tu....
p.s. razhar dok cari hang, sampai dia saspek hang ni Kapten Zaharie....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uft4yr84r49ttuutyuuprgtu Last edited by shazman73 on 6-11-2014 02:38 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shazman73 posted on 24-4-2014 06:34 PM
Tapi syoklah tengok s-300 yg rusia punya tu..klu malaysia ada 2-3 biji, pesawat canggih pun takut n ...
Ye ke? Camne dengan jammer? Atau Chaff?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uft4yr84r49ttuutyuuprgtu Last edited by shazman73 on 6-11-2014 02:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tumpang lalu jap...... bila malaysia nak pakai benda ni...leh cover tank tank kita nanti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...dan siapa pulak nak cover balik heli tu? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunday, September 28, 2014
Innovations in defence: Malaysia Boleh
http://kementah.blogspot.sg
When the Royal Malaysian Navy was tasked to conduct anti-piracy patrols in the Gulf of Aden, it cranked into action plans to convert civilian-flagged vessels into naval auxiliaries.
The two ships, Bunga Mas Lima and Bunga Mas Enam, exemplify the British concept of Ships Taken Up From Trade or STUFT, a concept for harnessing civil resources as military assets that was demonstrated with decisive effect by the British Royal Navy during the Falklands/Malvinas War in 1982.
This gem of an idea by the Malaysians is but one of many examples of the innovative spirit in defence science and engineering north of the Causeway. The speed with which the MISC ships were role-changed for a naval role, given a fresh coat of haze gray warpaint and teeth in the form of naval helicopters tells us something about the level of the ops-tech integration in Malaysia's defence eco-system.
More recently, Malaysian Minister of Defence, Hishammuddin Hussein has said abandoned Petronas oil rigs off Sabah are to be given a new lease of life as forward operating bases. The converted rigs will be gifted to the Eastern Sabah Security Command (ESSCOM) as floating lily pads that can be used to generate and sustain the Malaysian military's presence and authority in the seas south of the Philippines that have been used by lawless elements to test Malaysian resolve.
Malaysia's plans for Petronas oil rigs hark back to the British idea of building platforms to defend the mouth of the River Thames against German air and seaborne intruders during World War Two. They also mirror the Iranian practice of using oil rigs to exert a military presence at sea.
When ESSCOM's assets are in place, Malaysian authorities are likely to welcome opportunities to square off the challenge. Knowing the level of training and motivation of Malaysian forces, such engagements are likely to be embarrassingly one-sided.
Closer to home, the raising of two battalions of Keris (Brazilian ASTROS II) multiple rocket launchers by the Malaysian Army shows that its defence strategists understand and appreciate the decisive impact that MRLs have in the confined battespace of peninsular Malaysia.
So while an MRL - a tactical level artillery asset - would hardly caused ripples when fielded by a European army (so vast are distances there), the weapon system is a tactical asset with strategic effect in the Malaysian Army's theatre of operations. In Europe, strategic weapon systems are subject to close monitoring and arms control protocols. But not so in Southeast Asia.
Clearly, someone in the Malaysian defence ecosystem must have recognised the advantage that a mobile weapon system with a long reach can have during an Auto Strike situation when drawer plans must kick into action quickly to beat the reaction time of a hostile force as it mobilises from peace to war.
The addition of Metis M anti-tank missiles to Malaysia's war chest some years ago is noteworthy on two counts. Firstly, from an operational standpoint, the Metis missiles pack a punch as they have been designed to destroy modern main battle tanks like the Merkava. Secondly, from a force development standpoint, the in-service date for these hard-hitting missiles is indeed interesting to ponder over. Isn't it?
Alas, the Malaysians may not be masters of maximising public relations value from their defence innovations. They lack an annual Defence Technology Prize ceremony which lauds innovation, creativity and best practices in military technology. And while in Singapore, the Singapore Combat Engineers' idea for building a Floating Platform as an interim venue for our National Day Parades has been widely publicised, we have yet to see the Petronas oil rigs enjoy similar PR traction.
But just because you don't hear about their innovations, doesn't mean they have none to celebrate. Give credit where it is due. Well done Malaysia.
Posted by David Boey at 11:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jentayu Venture Sdn Bhd
Rotinor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
harap harap boleh tambah sampai 1000 buah lepas ni..kilang dan teknologi dah ada..harap deftech tak caj ikut harga semasa dunia la sebab teknologi beli guna duit kerajaan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hull buatan turkey , Turret buatan south africa......DEFTECH ni setakat pasang je songlap jual mahal ler |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GEMPITA
amat mantap nama yang dipilih
untuk kenderaan tempur
terbaharu TDM
syabas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kereta kebal pendekar tu deftevh tak mau develope into much better tank ke? Aku wonder wether depa ni ada bikin additional pendekar atau just stuck dkt 48 buah saja |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gabungan ADNAN, PENDEKAR dan GEMPITA = MANTAP. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 24-4-2014 08:09 AM
aku dah roger dia. 
Author
