|
Reply #235 tin's post
also light attack aircraft... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nih saje nak tanye, dalam cerita Lord of War tu, trasporter Antonov tu kene tembak ngan Aermachi jenis ni ke? or pesawat lain? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #243 yaminz's post
Beside CD configure yg terbaru is FD for M-339. M-346 mahal bai, beside belum ada airforce yang pakai lagi and epos tak mau jadi guinea pig as a first user. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by nando at 16-4-2009 13:13
kalau wa tak silap, plane terbaru ni hanya boleh melatih pilot shj. tarak bawa "dumb" bomb maupun bawa mesingan on board.
Bro, ini LIFT bukan nak buat pergi perang. Anyway modern training aircraft tak perlu letak gun pasal boleh letak gun pod di pylon!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UAE kan dah sign 48 bijik? M-346 ni sama jenis dan bentuk dgn YAK-130..."In 1993, Aermacchi signed an agreement to partner with Yakovlev on the new trainer the firm was developing for the Russian Air Force. The resulting aircraft first flew in 1996 and was brought to Italy the following year to substitute the aging MB-339.
At the time, the aircraft was marketed as the Yak/AEM-130, however, by 2000, differences in priorities between the two firms brought about an end to the partnership, with each developing the aircraft independently, with Aermacchi retaining worldwide marketing rights except for Russia and the other CIS nations. A Russian version is also being pursued by Yakovlev and Sokol, under a different time schedule." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balas #244 Canaletto\ catat
Sbenarnya, better kalo msia ambik A-50 tok training/light attack... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balas #248 razhar\ catat
korea, known as golden eagle... murah lak tu dr mb-339... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #249 yaminz's post
kalu tak silap aku..design cam fighting falcon kan? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balas #250 razhar\ catat
yup, mmg betul... kiranya cilok baik dr falcon...
lgpun diorg dpt license dr lockhead martin... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kita cuma ada pengalaman dgn AFV butan korea tu..kalu tgk spec A-50...boleh tahan jugak..kot price tu yg sangkut....lagi pun MB-339 series ni kan kita dah lama guna? dah serasi dgn nya kot geng2 engineering... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #246 razhar's post
UAE baru sign jer...
pesawatnya masih belom dpt certification lagi. baru dok tgh flight testing.
keperluan kita mendesak. tak leh tunggu dah M-346.
even Aermacchi pon tak rekmen kita tunggu sebab program M-346 ni lambat lagi mau siap. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #251 yaminz's post
itu jawapan sebenarnya. Lockheed Martin.
kalo mau beli itu pesawat, kena mintak kebenaran pakcik sam.
mau beli Gripen pon kena mintak kebenaran pakcik sam sebab Gripen pakai enjin GE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #252 razhar's post
faktor kita dah lama guna MB 339 pon jadi salah satu faktor penentu dlm pemilihan pesawat tuh.
tapi wa mmg suka M-346. sayang sungguh program certification dia masih panjang.
satu fakta yang menarik, lebih banyak Hawk 108 terhempas berbanding MB 339A. apsal ek? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #255 tin's post
Pasal dikudakan sekuda-kudanya tak lobai Tin? Tapi engine dua-dua ni sama typekan Tin? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #256 Canaletto's post
Class-wise (dan manufacturer) sama tapi kecuali TUDM guna sepc lain, Hawk pakai enjin Adour, Maki pakai Viper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #256 Canaletto's post
tak jugak.
masa dulu, MB-339 pon dikudakan juga sekuda- kudanya
don't forget, for at least 2 decades MB-339 is RMAF's sole jet trainer aircraft after Tebuans were retired.
the curse of one engined aircraft? MB-339 is also a single engined aircraft.
MB-339s did a wide variety of missions other than its core functions, from CAS to aerobatic displays. but crashes are a few and much of it happens in its 'old age'.
perhaps MB-339 is a much more forgiving aircraft, fun and easy to fly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by yaminz at 19-4-2009 02:33
korea, known as golden eagle... murah lak tu dr mb-339...
biar betik. Aku terbaca golden eagle antara yang termahal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|