|
[Tempatan]
JAKIM sahkan tiada DNA babi dlm Cadbury. Update : Pegawai JAKIM sedia makan
[Copy link]
|
|
MH370.......Air Turnback
Mat Said....Air Turnback
Jakim........Air Turnback
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry..dah was2. Walopon aku pencekik tegar ketbxxxt utk dua2 jenis ceklat tu... X sior nk mkn lg..babis ke hulu babis ke hilir.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cuba khir baharom try makan dulu nak tau ada babee atau tak |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anak_Nogori posted on 2-6-2014 12:10 PM
Dua coklat Cadbury sah tiada DNA babi
KUALA LUMPUR 2 Jun - Dua sampel produk coklat Cadbury yang ...
Saya lebih percaya result dari KKM berbanding Jab Kimia.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kazaraf posted on 2-6-2014 12:10 PM
yela.. sbb yg ckp ada babi tu pihak lain (bukan yg berautoriti dalam kes halal haram makanan)
so ...
Kalau nak tahu, KKM mmg Ada autoriti check..cuma tak boleh endorse.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_mangifera_ posted on 2-6-2014 08:56 PM
Saya lebih percaya result dari KKM berbanding Jab Kimia..
terpulang nak percaya kat mana pun...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penat aja buat demo bawah panas matahari |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Halal ke...x halal ke....tak kan ku sentuh CADBURY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wanieesyah posted on 2-6-2014 07:58 PM
Nak tanya keropok lekor yg ulos makan tiap petang ada tak pengesahan halal tak?
Kalo org islam yg buat dan claim halal maka org yg mkn xperlu lg mempersoalkan lg isi kandungan, cara buat.. Ni i dgr ustaz ckp..
sb kalo dh persoalkan maka dh jatuh was2.. Kalo pengusaha islam itu menipu tu dia kena jwb dgn allah..
mcmtu jgk konsep makcik jual nasi lemak dpn umah..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dah kata halal kalau aku nak mkn aku makan ja ...kalau ada babi dlm mkanan yg ada cop halal jakim, yg tu jakim tanggung laa..
Beriya ritu jakim duk wat promo n pengenalan penukaran logo dia..kita yg membeli ni pun memg ensure logo hat baru tu..kalau logo lain pada tu xkan beli..
lani apa cerr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mcmana yg random pick boleh tercemar? Bukankah berbungkus aluminum foil lagi. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kp jakim dah makan ke coklat tu live? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sape yg perlu dibabikan ni rase2? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
estrelle posted on 2-6-2014 08:36 PM
cuba khir baharom try makan dulu nak tau ada babee atau tak
bacul tu berani ke.....
|
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
elok masa jakim buat pengumuman takde babi tu sambil makan cadbury live.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
h@i posted on 2-6-2014 09:49 PM
elok masa jakim buat pengumuman takde babi tu sambil makan cadbury live..
Hahhahahahaah gelak guling guling aku. Kalau Jakim buat pengumuman sambil kunyah Cadbury prap prap mesti ummah yakin hahahahaha.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not easy to sue Cadbury
Posted on 2 June 2014 - 08:24pm
PETALING JAYA: Suing Cadbury Malaysia for damages over the alleged presence of porcine DNA in two of their products will prove to be difficult, tort lawyers said today.
Former Bar Council president Ragunath Sesavan said such claims for compensation are only valid if the plaintiffs can prove that porcine DNA is present in products they have purchased.
"(The) first thing to do is to prove causation, they must get proof that whatever it is they have purchased is contaminated (with porcine DNA).
"It must be what they purchased, what they have consumed and not some test samples. You must show that the item you purchased is defective," Ragunath said.
He said the plaintiffs cannot rely on tests run by the Health Ministry as it does not have correlation damages incurred upon them.
The Health Ministry recently detected traces of porcine DNA in Cadbury's "Dairy Milk Hazelnut" and "Dairy Milk Roast Almond" product lines, causing uproar among Muslims.
Some non-governmental organisations threatened to sue Cadbury for damages, retailers discarded the products from their inventory, and some even declared jihad on the company.
However, the Islamic Development Department announced after further tests by the Chemistry Department that the products are not contaminated by porcine DNA.
Senior tort lawyer Salim Bashir said since the Chemistry Department had ruled out any contamination, any claims brought forth will be difficult to exercise.
"If there is substantial evidence, then there is a chance it could work, (and) you can sue for special damages.
"But if the Chemistry Department found no porcine DNA, then there is no substance to the claim," he said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R2D2 posted on 2-6-2014 09:56 PM
Not easy to sue Cadbury
Posted on 2 June 2014 - 08:24pm
tapi market dia akan terjejas la...kecuali yang x kisah bab halal haram ni... aku mmg x bape nak pircaya apa lagi kat tanah milayu ni banyak benda bley u-turn pe....x pe..x makan ceklat kadburi pun x mati pon...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|