itu ahso segambut arr kasi tukar sama itu howard lee.nurul izzah jgn sesekali masuk kabinet .kabinet dapur rumah dia xpe...takde sapa kesahhh.sekian dari acik porem parlimen ipoh timur
Dalam BH Online ditulis rombak kabinet dan kemungkinan pilihanraya lebih awal.. so nampak dah x cover line dah utk bagi hint pilihanraya thn depan ni...
Post time 10-11-2025 11:59 PMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
pocongkiutss replied at 9-11-2025 04:41 PM
Biar betul mat sabun noks..nangess
jgn pandang enteng pada mat sabu.. aidil yunus juga memperakui mat sabu lebih bijak drpd zafrul aziz dan anwar ibrahim
"..di dalam semangat g-string merah abg mat (mat sabu), saya rasa abg mat lebih bijak drpd zafrul dgn anwar ibrahim.." - aidil yunus aka yb viral (pada masa 1:00:59 dalam video di bawah)
dari dulu sampai sekarang, g-string merah menjadi antara kata kunci penting dlm dunia politik malaysia
---
ulasan oleh team demi negara berkenaan trump tariff policy dan rta u.s. - malaysia (skip ke 42:00)
Post time 11-11-2025 12:44 AMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
Edited by terma2nkondisi2 at 11-11-2025 12:48 AM
terma2nkondisi2 replied at 10-11-2025 11:59 PM
jgn pandang enteng pada mat sabu.. aidil yunus juga memperakui mat sabu lebih bijak drpd zafrul az ...
dulu ada juga sikit2 pasal polemik trump tariff policy ni unconstitutional atau boleh dibuat.. rupa2nya sekarang ni dah sampai ke u.s. supreme court
di bawah ni ringkasan google/gemini
---
The question of whether President Trump's tariff policy is unconstitutional is currently being decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, with lower courts having previously ruled against the administration. The core of the legal debate centers on the separation of powers and whether Congress lawfully delegated the authority to impose such broad tariffs to the president.
Key Legal Arguments
• Congress's Power: The U.S. Constitution, in Article I, Section 8, explicitly grants Congress the sole authority "To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises" and to "regulate Commerce with foreign Nations". Tariffs are a form of tax on imported goods.
• Presidential Authority: The Trump administration has argued it has the power to impose tariffs under existing statutes, primarily the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 and Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, by declaring a national emergency.
• Lower Court Rulings: Multiple lower courts, including the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, have found Trump's use of IEEPA for imposing sweeping tariffs to be unlawful and an overreach of presidential authority. They noted that IEEPA does not explicitly mention tariffs as an authorized action.
• Major Questions Doctrine: The appeals court relied on the "major questions" doctrine, which requires Congress to provide clear authorization for executive actions that have vast economic and political significance. Critics argue that interpreting IEEPA to grant unlimited tariff power would be an unconstitutional transfer of legislative authority.
• Supreme Court Review: The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on this issue in November 2025. Justices from across the ideological spectrum expressed skepticism about whether IEEPA grants the president the near-limitless power to impose tariffs without explicit congressional approval.
A final decision from the Supreme Court is pending and will determine the ultimate legality and constitutionality of these specific tariff actions and the scope of future presidential power in trade matters.
The Supreme Court has not yet issued a final ruling on the legality of the Trump administration's sweeping tariff policies. The case was argued before the Court on November 5, 2025, and a decision is expected before the end of June 2026.
---
masa mula2 trump jadi presiden dulu2 pun (2017 hingga 2021) dia guna alasan2 spt national security, national emergency, foreign country's "unjustifiable, unreasonable, or discriminatory" trade practices utk guna tariff policy utk buat trade war
sekiranya u s. supreme court buat keputusan yg tidak memihak kepada trump, dijangka pertengahan 2026 tu, kelihatan sekarang gayanya trump punya team tak plan utk dptkan kebenaran drpd u.s. congress, sebaliknya team trump ada plan b utk masih lagi cari selok-belok pada akta undang2 u.s. yg sedia ada utk masih lagi buat tariff policy ikut acuan diorg utk masih lagi teruskan trade war
Post time 11-11-2025 01:01 AMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
antara perkara yg menarik perhatian yg boleh acik2 porem baca adalah berkenaan IMEC
u.s./trump punya plan nak tamatkan perang di gaza ada kaitannya juga dgn IMEC - The India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor.. yg mana juga sbg strategi utk counter pengaruh china dlm geopolitik global