|
|
Reply #36 mat_toro's post
|
Beb, AK-47 berat betul la. Tried it the other day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #37 RainbowSix's post
hehehe....
x der pic ker bro.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #38 insignia's post
Takdak la beb. Next time.
I also fired a Baretta F92. Excellenct pistol. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #39 RainbowSix's post
|
you mean 92F? yup, excellent. tapi depa kata nak dismantle tu payah ooo... ketat dan spring dia terlampau kuat. silap-silap, slide boleh terpelanting masa bukak atau pasang balik. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #37 RainbowSix's post
berat? hmmm... if my memory served me right, tak la berat sangat. tapi yang saya bawak tu AK102. banyak komposit dgn plastic furniture. mungkin tu yang buat dia ringan. tapi tang tembak tu tak sempat. bos-bos je yang diberi privilege.
jadi camner? sedap menembak AK 47? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #41 tin's post
|
Rifel kosong mungkin tak berat sangat...tapi peluru dia yang kasi berat kot? Ye la, kaliber lagi besar. Aku dulu pun pegang AK kosong aje... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #42 alphawolf's post
|
ha'ah yea. lupa pulak bab peluru. memang wa bawak AK-102 dengan mag kosong. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #41 tin's post
Berat la beb. Badan AK47 plus 20 rounds of 7.62mm, hmm...berat tul...
Nak tembak, takut aku...
Tapi, the Baretta 92F is superb. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bang, takkan AK best kot. Kita dah guna NATO standard ammo, nak tukar banyak tu. Tapi, M4 ni baguih ke? Short distance, not so accurate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AK-101 use standard 5.56 x 45mm NATO round.
One more thing, even GI troop in Iraq is prefering using the AK rather than their own M4. The CIA troop in Afghanistan also make the same choice.
[ Last edited by alien7749 at 3-4-2007 07:56 AM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have never seen GIs carry AKs in Iraq or afghanistan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #6 alien7749's post
I think it is not that they prefer to use AKs, but from what I read , they want a heavier round than a 5.56mm , similar to size to a AK 7.62mm which had superior stoping power than a NATO 5.56mm....as the smaller 5.56mm round was found to not have sufficient stopping power to drop a man from distance.....
..in vietnam , the 5.56mm round also had the same problem, where after shooting an enemy soldier, numerous times there was only a massive blood trail lthat was eft, but no body ...
anyways, the US Amry Special Operations Group (SOG) was using AKs in Vietnam...but mainly to reduce M-16 visual signature for the point man from the enemy observers when operating in North Vietnam.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #11 matmin77's post
|
hmm...however, same principles in vietnam might be employed in Iraq or Afganistan..if special operation forces operate behind enemy lines...AKs would be usefull to use keep enemy from discovering you... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think the average GI in iraq is allowed to use non standard issue rifle even if he doesn't like it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rambo pun prefer AK-47.. M-16 seems for chicks.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 15-2-2007 01:02 PM
