|
|
pssssssssssssssssssttttttttt...ada rahsia beso. Harap jgn sampai musuh tau.
Since our MIG29N are non-combat capable and the pilot are incompetent all asset has been designated for KAMIKAZE" war doctrin!!!!
[ Last edited by Canaletto at 13-8-2008 03:36 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #41 Canaletto's post
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #37 alien7749's post
errr...
tumpang tanya, rasa pedah tu camner ek? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #44 tin's post
|
Pedah tu sikit lebih kurang rasa pijor le...agaknya la..ni bahasa org seberang kut |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #45 areguard's post
I see....  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by tin at 13-8-2008 04:04 PM 
errr...
tumpang tanya, rasa pedah tu camner ek?
pedah nie bahasa ganu, tin. Pedas ---> pedah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nie ape nyer topic ler......
Takkan ler kerajaan Malaysia nie teruk mangkuk, bodoh sgt pie beli kapal terbang yg tak leh fully utilised peranan dia.....
You nyer soalan nie patut ker tak patut nak jawab???ermmmmmmmmmmmm biarler anda dgn labu labu anda....
hehehehehe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MiG? setahu aku state kebolehgunaan MiG lebih baik dari Nuri.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #49 venez's post
Is that good or bad?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by yko9798 at 13-8-2008 05:15 PM 
nie ape nyer topic ler......
Takkan ler kerajaan Malaysia nie teruk mangkuk, bodoh sgt pie beli kapal terbang yg tak leh fully utilised peranan dia.....
You nyer soalan nie patut ker tak pa ...
akibat 'tiris' dan 'bocor' tadi, banyak pembelian ATM membazir dan mahal daripada yang sepatutnye. Contoh,
1. harga NGPV lebih mahal dari Krivak III FFG,
2. pembelian F/A-18D yang takde source code kata Tun Mahathir
3. kenapa beli AM-339CM kalau LIFT unit dah ada Hawk 108 dan kenapa hanya beli 8 bijik je. It sould be wiser to commonize to Hawk 100 series.
4. Mi-17 untuk PDRM lebih mahal dari NH-90, dan PDRM takleh pakai pun. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #51 alien7749's post
so your question and issue sebenarnya pasal tiris dan bocor la kan?
cuma nak bagi cantik packaging letak cerita Miggy kat depan :re: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #51 alien7749's post
jawapanya:
1. krivak design tahun berapa punya design, falsafah rekabentuk dia ikut doktrin sapa?
2. Alangkan Australia pon tak dapat source code untuk F/A-18A depa, inikan pulak kita yang operate F/A-18D. itu Australia tuh member baik US tuh.
3. Hawk 108 tu untuk latihan. bukan untuk LIFT. LIFT punya versi lagi mahal. mungkin MB-339CB tu lagi murah. lagipon Aermacchi kata akan refurbish MB-339AM kita at no cost kalo kita beli CB. Jimat duit.
4. Mil-171 lagi mahal drp NH-90? bior betik bro? tak kisah la. PDRM boleh pakai itu heli. cuma depa takmo je citing technical issues. tapi rasanya sebab heli tuh tak cun. rosak la imej PDRM  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #53 tin's post
yg wa dgr cerita pasal Mil tu pasal polisi ker atau procedur DCA....lebih kurang cam tu ah
dorang kata russia nye plane tak sync ngan DCA(western) nya procedur(ke hape tah dorang ckp ari tu)
so yang boleh dorang guna sama ada tuk military atau rescue yang tak terikat dgn DCA...polis kan terikat dgan DCA....
lebih kurang ah kot...kalu salah tolong betulkan...heheheh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #54 Periuk_api1209's post
itu la yg wa cakap isu teknikal.
tapi itu alasan je.
kalo ikut, heli awam atau pilot dia ada lesen DCA, mana boleh bawak senjata.
boleh jamin ka heli polis tak pernah bawak senjata?
musti pernah punya
lagipon, kalo mau, wa rasa gomen boleh waive itu requirement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
krivak design tahun berapa punya design, falsafah rekabentuk dia ikut doktrin sapa?
At least, Krivak is fully equipped, tak macam NGPV, cuma ada 76mm dan 30mm. Yang lain FFBNW craps...
Back to question, anyone can confirm on MiG-29? Is it still reasonable to keep MiG-29N, which is effectively an MiG-29SD and or par with an F-16A? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #56 alien7749's post
yup. that true. Krivak comes fully equipped and with it the inadequacies of 1950s/ 60s ship design. warships are more than about weapon carrying capability.
Like I said before, nobody can confirm on MiG-29N. I'm afraid you have to go back to your source. or you can try calling ATSC. I'm sure they would love to help you in any way they can |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by alien7749 at 13-8-2008 11:46 AM 
We are not at war, why bother buying the hardware at the first place?
today war, tommorow buy, next day arrive
mr alien can call this number :7552525, then get the special delivery of pizza
and instantly ready to fight d enemies with those hot pizza..
very simple one lah, eh mr alien  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yup. that true. Krivak comes fully equipped and with it the inadequacies of 1950s/ 60s ship design. warships are more than about weapon carrying capability.
Krivak III has many stealth element incorporated to the design. Beside, electronics gadgets evolve faster than mechanical design. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #59 alien7749's post
I didn't say anything about stealth.
since you said "Beside, electronics gadgets evolve faster than mechanical design." are you stipulating that NGPV are using more mechanical design rather than electronics?
hehehe...
If I correctly recalled, even Russian electronics gadget are wayyy inferior compared to western ones.
looks like you've shot one of your own points |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 13-8-2008 03:34 PM
[/img] -------->>>[img]http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:0IhGSYnug0KdbM:
[/img] 
Author
