|
|
shaxa replied at 1-8-2019 02:50 PM
Hahahahha kesian agaknya kat cottage istana tu mekgan tak jumpa gripe water
maybe..  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eva replied at 31-7-2019 10:16 AM
I read somewhere mmg BRF ni keturunan Cleopatra, keturunan Mark Anthony.. dan dr susur gaur Namrud ...
Memang ler
Barang2 firaun Ada pada QE
Ada dalam gambar coronation
Nanti Jap cari |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
snazzydaisy replied at 31-7-2019 02:28 AM
Part 1 and 2 of the vid (the first one hour) mmg focus on black magic, rituals & illuminati stuff. ...
Yup
Ada cerita kanak2 yg terlepas dari ritual palaces di Belgium. Take it or leave it. All Euro royals mmg lizards. Cold blood.
Banjir nabi nuh Ni sebab Allah nak hapuskan lizards annunaki nephilim Dan yg Naik kapal tu pure human dari nabi Noh saw Dan pengikut nya, yg berkembang biak.
Malang nya Tak semua hapus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bioessence replied at 1-8-2019 04:30 PM
Memang ler
Barang2 firaun Ada pada QE
Ada dalam gambar coronation
ok tq bioessence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bioessence replied at 1-8-2019 04:43 PM
Yup
Ada cerita kanak2 yg terlepas dari ritual palaces di Belgium. Take it or leave it. All Euro r ...
wooow.. ingat mmg dah mati dah some race yg you ckp tu.. scary..
I heard this from ceramah agama.. mmg ustaz tu kata ada keturunan half manusia dan half makhluk lain .. scarynya bila tau benda ni wujud lagi.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by snazzydaisy at 1-8-2019 06:53 PM
Meghan Markle is the worst kind of snob
That’s why people dislike her. It’s got nothing to do with race.
JOANNA WILLIAMS I ASSOCIATE EDITOR I 31st July 2019
‘CryGod for Harry, England, and Saint George.’ Ok, so we’ve come a long way since Shakespeare’s take on the Battle of Agin court. But still, Cry God for Harry. Thank God we have our very own Prince Hal to instruct us in the evils of racism and lead us into the woke uplands. Having ditched the base contagious clouds of, erm, playing naked billiards in Las Vegas and dressing up as a Nazi, Harry is now out to educate us all on the problem of unconscious bias.
The Prince, as newly genned-up on racism as a students’ union officer recently graduated from Intersectionality 101, has decreed that ‘just as stigma is handed down from generation to generation, your perspective on the world and onlife and on people is something that is taught to you. It’s learned from your family, learned from the older generation, or from advertising, from your environment. ’ Bless him, Harry is clearly speaking from experience here. If anyone has a claim to have learned racism from his family it’s the 6th in line to the throne. But the rest of us? Not so much. It’s bad enough that we keep His Royal Highness in luxury without also having to endure his preaching.
Harry’s great anti-racist awokening coincided with his marriage to Meghan Markle and he has led the way ever since in denouncing as ‘racist’ any criticism of his wife. He set the narrative back in 2016 with a letter to the press condemning the ‘racial undertones’ in coverage of his then girlfriend. And where Harry leads, others follow. The kind of commentators you might normally expect to oppose the monarchy, with all its inherited wealth and privilege, queue up to denounce even the slightest criticism of our Meghan.
So when, as happened yesterday, Daily Mail columnist Sarah Vine took Meghan totask for her beyond-parody guest editorship of Vogue, woke Twitter immediately rounded on Vine and leapt to the defence of Megs. Judging by the vitriollevelled at Vine, you’d expect her column to be one racial slur after another. Far from it. It’s the headline, ‘We Brits prefer true royalty to fashion royalty’, that seems to have prompted so much anger. Now, you’ve really got toread between the lines here (back to Intersectionality 101, if you didn’t pickup on it) but the implication, we’re told, is that Meghan is being singled out as not a proper royal. She’s being held to a higher standard than, say, Duchess Kate. Whereas Kate will always be ‘true royalty’ and the long dead Diana always‘the people’s princess’, poor Meghan is destined only ever to be ‘fashion royalty’. In drawing this distinction, Meg’s defenders argue, Vine is not only revealing her own racism but dog-whistling to the inner racist in all the ignorant Mail-reading plebs.
But the truth is that few Brits have a problem with Meghan because she is (ever so slightly) black. Precisely the opposite: in the eyes of everyone unable to stomach more than one episode of Suits, Meghan being ‘biracial’ (as she describes herself) and involving gospel singers and black preachers in anotherwise boring wedding ceremony is the only vaguely cool thing about her. Back in 2011, about one in 10 UK couples who live together described themselvesas being in an ‘interracial’ relationship. This was up 35 per cent on the previous decade and is highly likely to have risen further still. Estimates suggest that there are almost one million mixed-race children being raised by interracial parents across the country.
With the possible exception of a few sad social outcasts, no one has a problem with the fact that Meghan’s mum just happens to be black. No, Meghan is criticised for being snobby, elitist, hopelessly out of touch and possessing all the self-awareness of a flea. It’s not Meghan’s skin colour that annoys people, but the fact that she thinks nothing of donning an outfit that costs more than most people in the UK earn in a year and then getting her minders toorder the public not to take photos of her. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex happily spend ￡2.4million of taxpayers’ money on renovating their house but then keep the press away from their son’s christening. Meghan has a baby shower involving private jets to New York and then tries to be taken seriously as someone raising awareness about the importance of mental health.
When Meghan wants to deflect criticism from her lavish lifestyle and petty authoritarianism, she presents herself as a social-justice warrior with lessons for us all on mental health, feminism and racism. Frankly, no one wants aprincess to tell them how to think. It’s preachy and condescending and hypocritical. So it’s no surprise that Meghan’s guest editorship of the uber glossy and stupidly expensive fashion magazine Vogue has come in for criticism. The cover features 15 women considered to be ‘forces for change’ (including a mirror, natch, so us ordinary folk can see ourselves aschange-makers, too). Inside is an editorial penned by Meghan, and interviews with primatologist Jane Goodall and Michelle Obama – who reveals that her 15-year-old self would congratulate her on having landed such a cute husband. So, really inspirational stuff.
The criticisms of this project write themselves. The glossy pictures of women who tick boxes (black: check; brown: check; disabled: check; transgender: check) alongside adverts for designer frocks reduces any serious message to frippery. Few of the 15 women chosen have made a huge contribution to society: they have been chosen because of who they are, not because of what they have achieved. Yet we are supposed to fawn over them as role models and see them as a source of inspiration. Yuck. Vogue – exactly like feminism and royalty – is simply posh, privileged tripe.
There are heaps of reasons for people not just to criticise Meghan and Harry, but to ridicule their hypocrisy and puncture their pomposity. And not one involves the colour of Meghan’s skin. Meghan comes in for criticism because she is the worst kind of snob who condescends to tell others not just what to do, but also what to think. The fact that she is biracial is completely irrelevant. Of course, there is an obvious solution for Harry and Meghan if they do not like the public attention and criticism. Harry could denounce his claim to the throne. They could give up the titles, move out of the palaces and fund their ownlifestyle. I can’t for the life of me imagine why they don’t.
Meghan Markle is the worst kind of snob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by eva at 1-8-2019 07:51 PM
snazzydaisy replied at 1-8-2019 06:45 PM
Meghan Markle is the worst kind of snob
That’s why people dislike her. It’s got nothing to do ...
bravooooo..
betul.. we never hate her because of her skin colour or her bi-racial background. heck berjuta org kat UK tu biracial and it never be black mom or white dad whatsoever punya point. ramai biracial berjaya kat UK tu tanpa menggunakan mouth or spreading their legs utk kejayaan mrk.
it is all about herself, she is selfish and snobbish bish, who uses her mouth and spreading her legs to get whatever she got now. Dia stink through and through..
Dah di bg education bagus, dah dpt interim kat embassy, yg sibuk melacurkan diri dan berjoli dgn jutawan kaya tu apsal? she is the architect of her own downfall.. jgn salahkan org lain.
byk kat internet tulis yg meggot ni nak spark racial tension kat UK. Org itam kat UK kata Sod Off! back to your LA slum la meggy.. jgn kacau hal org kat UK..menyibuk je..kalau nak sgt jd princess itam, gi kawin la dgn kerabat aprika. Itu pun kalau dorg sudi terima hang 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by eva at 1-8-2019 07:57 PM
ok arini kat tumblr.. ada someone tny
Anonymous asked:
Hi Skippy, heres a thing, MM anon told you about the I'll kiss your @#$% for a voiceover.... MM was a voiceover in the film which is why PH and her attended and not the Cambridge's.. The Disney money was not a donation it was payment for her role... however she was stopped from being identified as herself because it broke protocol... her excuse being PH and PW had appeared as extras in Star Wars...
Interesting….and how does one verify this?
wohoooo.. dendiam dah buat kerja.. dtg LK punya premier utk kutip upah rupanyaaaa.... haaa... vile woman! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sehari dua ni pun, MM dan lakinya mula dihencap secara kaw2 oleh media kat sana, termasuk reporter kat Daily Beast yg pernah simpati~ dgn nasib duchass dulu pun kutuk Vogue edisi terbaru nih "goes down in flame" katanya.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pliss laaa... sejak bila bibir ikan koi kelihatan seksi pd manusia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ginger hanat panggil pengkritik bininya sbg rasis, secara halusnya dia bg green light utk rabid sussex fans terus 'mengganas'.
btw
persidangan syok sendiri utk set2 kaya dan berpengaruh perasan woke dan virtue signaling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dani-rox replied at 31-7-2019 12:49 AM
Kheeeenn. Sis snazzy, acik2 bawang international dah start bukak kisah MM masa jd intern kat US ...
her pouseyy has gone international yo. Auch. Pencelupan worldwide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smelly, rotten pussy kalau mengikut kata bini pegawai pengiring sussex di Oz dulu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by snazzydaisy at 1-8-2019 10:20 PM
Meghan Markle branded ‘cheap, vulgar and irresponsible’ by outspoken Lady Colin Campbell
Meghan Markle branded ‘cheap, vulgar and irresponsible’ by outspoken Lady ColinCampbell, who says ‘she was never an A-lister so needs to stop acting like one’
Martha Cliff
30 Jul 2019, 11:31Updated: 30 Jul 2019, 11:41
LADY Colin Campbell has branded Meghan Markle “cheap and vulgar” in an explosive new interview.
The author, 69, who has published three books on the royals, has also urged the Duchess of Sussex to stop acting like a celebrity.
Speaking to Closer magazine she said: “She was never an A-lister, so she needs to stop acting like one.
“Royalty do not behave like celebrities do. It’s cheap, vulgar and irresponsible.”
The royal writer went on to say that Meghan was “letting down” those who admire her by behaving this way.
This is not the first time that Lady Colin has warned the Duchess of Sussex of being wary of her behaviour.
In April she advised that Meghan should avoid becoming a “political activist” as the “royals must represent all of the people” and she should know when “keep her mouth shut”.
Lady Colin added: “There are many conservative people, all over the world, many religious people, who do not have these 'woke' and 'right-on' views.”
It comes as Meghan was revealed as guest-editor of British Vogue's Septembe rissue.
The project saw the Duchess of Sussex select 15 women to be featured on the cover, choosing not to star herself, whom she hails "forces for change."
The magazine has sparked a storm of protest, with critics reminding Meghan that royals must remain neutral at all times.
Meghan has since been criticised for the "leftie" cover by Leo McKinstry who, similarly to Lady Colin, warns Meghan must stay out of politics like Kate.
Brexit Party MEP Ann Widdecombe said: “Royals have not only got to keep out of politics but they have got to be seen to keep out of politics.”
Ingrid Seward, editor-in-chief of Majesty magazine, said: “The Duchess of Sussex has done a huge favour for the House of Conde Naste (Vogue’s publisher) and rather less for the House of Windsor.”
 geez, how to expect her to shut her mouth when MM doesnt even know how to close her legs & control her tongue!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ooopppsssssie
|
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tinfoil hats off & conspiracy/blackmail theory aside, teori kat bawah ni dprd acik LSA re their exit strategies, make sense tak?
ref: page #1130, post #33876
So I'm back with a theory.
Around the time of the foundation split there were whispers that H&M were interested in getting involved in politics-- namely, political fundraising. When Meghan declared that she and Harry were going to change the world, I don't think she meant as a Duke and Duchess. There is only so much that charity work can do, especially within the confines of the BRF. If they are able to rally behind a political candidate (likely American), and use money and their influence to get that person elected, they will be unstoppable.
This could explain a few things.
- Meghan's disinterest in winning over the BRF. She realized early on that there wasn't much the BRF could give her aside from visibility, and the rules are too limiting to her ultimate goal. Plus the job wasn't as glamorous as she thought it would be.
- Meghan/Harry's disinterest in winning over the British public
They don't need the British public anymore. They are moving on to the world stage.
- H&M's disregard for protocol
The protocol only matters if they intend to remain working members of the BRF. That's no longer the goal. What is most important right now is personal revenue and financial backing for their foundation. If they have to break protocol to ensure that-- so be it.
- H&M's sudden desire for "privacy".
They are gearing up to "leave" the royal family and monetize their brand. They have no interest in courting the media on behalf of the BRF unless absolutely necessary.
- The media circus
They are probably behind a lot of the negative press and are purposely feeding false stories to the media so they can discredit them down the line. The negative press is also polarizing the public so that those who are pro H&M become fanatic in their need to defend them. When H&M strike out on their own, they'll take a gaggle of stans along with them who will vilify the BRF. They are sowing the seeds now with stories of Meghan being miserable because of bad press (that THEY created). If the British media was 100% positive about Markle, there would be no way for her to justify leaving the BRF to run a private foundation with commercial interests. But now she has an out-- the press is evil.
- Archie
There is no interest in Archie being a royal so they want to limit the public's access to him as much as possible until they launch their own brand.
Harry is going along with it because what else does he have left? He's not as close to his family, his grandmother is in her final years, and all eyes are on the Cambridges. Why would he turn down the chance to become a force of his own and change the world beyond what his brother can do?
The only thing I'm unsure of is how long he'll be around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
voiceover for which character? ada ke character gedikss ngengada dlm LK movie tu? character cenggini je yg sesuai dgn suara dia 
another theory, Disney family kan related to illuminati juga, is it possible that Disney is one of the backers, and she is paid for her "special penetration services"??? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dani-rox replied at 1-8-2019 09:18 PM
pliss laaa... sejak bila bibir ikan koi kelihatan seksi pd manusia
hahhahaa.. nang ada hahaha.. ndang sik kck bibir barunya memain je dani
I tot her lips are fakeeee..
x lawa pout dia.. cam mulut ikan trout...
opppsss hahaha |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dani-rox replied at 1-8-2019 09:24 PM
kemain lg top secret sgt projek vogeh si duchass nih. hakikatnya, buat curi2 di belakang BP
...
semua buat belakang BP.. OMG nastyyyyy..
and you know what dani.. haa.. betul la kata Annon kat skippy tu..makin dia nak secret secret.. makin ramai tahu sapa accomplice dia.. satu satu keluar nama org yg collaborate ngan MM.. this is nut.
Dorg feel honour ke membelakangi BP. x pasal2 lesen British Vogue kena gantung dan ada yg nnt kena fired
nasty nya meggot... now I believe kalau dia tinggal kat KP atau BP ada kemungkinan dia akan mencuri harta kat sana..
ishh ish ishh.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 1-8-2019 03:59 PM
