CariDotMy

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

Author: gancity

KS-1A ATM choice?

[Copy link]
Post time 27-11-2007 12:04 PM | Show all posts
Originally posted by yaminz at 26-11-2007 05:02 PM
Ada faedah, bole claim Limbang...


Well, clearly what u thought  earlier is disputable.
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


 Author| Post time 15-12-2007 02:28 PM | Show all posts
hv a close look on KS-1A (some source say it had change it name become HQ-12 and equip by PLA)





photo from: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_559b9d6301007v5t.html
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 5-3-2008 02:42 PM | Show all posts
Malaysia's Future Air Defence Requirements
01/12/07 - TEMPUR NOVEMBER 2007

In order to establish a hierarchical, layered and in-depth national air defence system, the Malaysian Armed Forces (MAF) has projected a requirement for a minimum of 20 Batteries of enhanced short-range air defence systems (E-SHORADS), three Batteries of medium-range surface-to-air missiles (M-SAM), an additional 200 very short-range SAMs (VSHORADS), six gapfiller ra** and a similar number of low-probability-of-intercept (LPI) tactical air defence ra**, plus four passive surveillance systems (PSS), all during the current 9th Malaysia Plan (2006-2010) and following 10th Malaysia Plan (2011-1015). While the Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) and Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) are in favour of acquiring the M-SAMs, E-SHORADS, and the FN-6 VSHORADS (from China抯 CPMIEC) to replace the existing THALES Starburst VSHORADS, the Malaysian Army is known to prefer acquiring the E-SHORADS and maintaining its existing VSHORADS assets (KBM of Russia抯 Igla-1, Pakistan抯 Institute of Industrial Control Systems-built Anza Mk2 and the soon-to-be-acquired FN-6) in service along with the MBDA-built Jernas SHORADS. For the M-SAM requirement, the principal contenders include the CPMIEC-built Kai Shan KS-1A, Russia抯 Ulyanovsk Mechanical Plant JSC抯 Buk-M2E and MBDA抯 Aster-15, while the E-SHORADS contenders will reportedly include the MBDA-built Spada 2000, Tula-based KBP Instrument Design Bureau of Russia抯 96K6 Pantsyr-S1E and Almaz-Antey Concern抯 Tor-M2E, Bodenseewerk Geratecknik of Germany抯 vertically launched Iris-T, and Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 13-3-2008 02:03 PM | Show all posts
Rasanya tak payah ler. Expose sgt menatang ni. Kalao dalam canister to boleh la consider.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-3-2008 08:33 AM | Show all posts

Reply #104 curryjames71's post

wa dengar priority MRAD dah jatuh.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-3-2008 08:42 AM | Show all posts

Reply #105 tin's post

hearsay x bleh pecaya tin, u know better about that.........
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
Post time 14-3-2008 09:12 AM | Show all posts

Reply #103 Eokboy's post

Cam kompem jea Msia pakai KS-1 nei...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 14-3-2008 09:15 AM | Show all posts

Reply #106 tangopapa's post

Well, I think you know better how far is the truth in the hearsay that I heard
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 15-3-2008 08:09 AM | Show all posts
Aku tak pandai benda missile ni tapi nak menyibuk jugak...to me daripada tak ada langsung, baik beli KS-1A since itu je yg Gomen mampu untuk isi gaping need for medium range untuk membentuk layered defence AD..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-3-2008 09:50 AM | Show all posts

Reply #109 areguard's post

Pakai 2 jenis pon xpe, KS-1 n BUK-M2...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 17-3-2008 10:38 AM | Show all posts
Belilah ikut kemampuan dan keperluan
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 18-3-2008 03:02 PM | Show all posts
Betul belilah ikut pepatah ukur baju badan sundrii..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 22-3-2008 11:19 AM | Show all posts
Bagi saya, KS-1 dah nampak kuno sgt dah.  Bile kite dapat bende ni 5-10 tahun dr sekarang dah jadi antik.AKu dengar MAF sendiri tak suka KS-1.

Bagi aku pembelian ni akan bawak byk kesusahan kpd MAF sepertimana pembelian Mig-29.All for so called 'National Interest' at the cost of taxpayer;s miney and national security.

[ Last edited by  hijazzains at 22-3-2008 11:21 AM ]
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 22-3-2008 02:56 PM | Show all posts

Reply #113 hijazzains's post

agreed..  nampaknya the purchasing of equipments ni still di takuk lama.lain yg dimintak,lain pulak yg dapat.

kalau perang nanti rasanya suruh JP/KJ etc je la yg operate menatang nih.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 22-3-2008 03:41 PM | Show all posts
Nanti manpads FN-6 yg JP sila mane pasang tu entah2 tembak pun takleh... ..kene screw dua kali kang.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 22-3-2008 07:16 PM | Show all posts

Reply #115 hijazzains's post

bunyi macam sea skua test no. 1 dulu jer, tapi tu jerung putih yg bikin....
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 23-3-2008 09:37 AM | Show all posts
are they still considering the KS-1A?? urghhh... we'll be the laughing stock of the region over again.

what la...

cummon man,kalau nak beli,biar la betul2.mahal skit takpe la..what is important is that the system wll be effective when called upon to defend the nation,and not some 'tukun laut' system that only looks like one but doesn't function as well against current and future threats.

kalau takde duit,simpan dulu la..jangan membazir..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 23-3-2008 03:45 PM | Show all posts

Reply #117 supergripen's post

All because of that pencil looking FN-6 manpads and I red that PLA dun use FN-6 anymore   and only give them to Chinese peasant conscript in the farms.

Malaysia should lose the notion of manufacturing arms locally. Look at Steyr..habuk pun takde plus NGPV..losing $$$ by tons..if it was to create expertise, sending our engineers to build NGPV would have sufficed....no need to reinvent the whee and losing $$$ at the same timel!!!
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 23-3-2008 04:28 PM | Show all posts
Guyz, dengo hearsay this FN-6 memang dah masuk dalam inventori tapi tak banyak maybe few units sahaja masa heboh our army wanted this KS-1A. FN-6 ni pun cuma gula-gula for the future would be KS-1A should we decided as a TOT. Alih-alih tembelang sudah pecah pasal the armed force was fed with false fact says that PRC has been equipped with this KS-1A walhal fakta tu tak betul so our planner dah tolak KS-1A ni. Anyway ni cuma hearsay sahaja le!
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 23-3-2008 04:33 PM | Show all posts

Reply #119 Canaletto's post

amin. KS-1 mmg patut ditolak bulat2. Hope the MAF is more assertive in future procurements.They should take advantage of the political climate to be more transparent.
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT



 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CariDotMy

20-11-2024 11:45 AM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.109099 second(s), 27 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list