|
Originally posted by yaminz at 26-11-2007 05:02 PM
Ada faedah, bole claim Limbang...
Well, clearly what u thought earlier is disputable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysia's Future Air Defence Requirements
01/12/07 - TEMPUR NOVEMBER 2007
In order to establish a hierarchical, layered and in-depth national air defence system, the Malaysian Armed Forces (MAF) has projected a requirement for a minimum of 20 Batteries of enhanced short-range air defence systems (E-SHORADS), three Batteries of medium-range surface-to-air missiles (M-SAM), an additional 200 very short-range SAMs (VSHORADS), six gapfiller ra** and a similar number of low-probability-of-intercept (LPI) tactical air defence ra**, plus four passive surveillance systems (PSS), all during the current 9th Malaysia Plan (2006-2010) and following 10th Malaysia Plan (2011-1015). While the Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) and Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) are in favour of acquiring the M-SAMs, E-SHORADS, and the FN-6 VSHORADS (from China抯 CPMIEC) to replace the existing THALES Starburst VSHORADS, the Malaysian Army is known to prefer acquiring the E-SHORADS and maintaining its existing VSHORADS assets (KBM of Russia抯 Igla-1, Pakistan抯 Institute of Industrial Control Systems-built Anza Mk2 and the soon-to-be-acquired FN-6) in service along with the MBDA-built Jernas SHORADS. For the M-SAM requirement, the principal contenders include the CPMIEC-built Kai Shan KS-1A, Russia抯 Ulyanovsk Mechanical Plant JSC抯 Buk-M2E and MBDA抯 Aster-15, while the E-SHORADS contenders will reportedly include the MBDA-built Spada 2000, Tula-based KBP Instrument Design Bureau of Russia抯 96K6 Pantsyr-S1E and Almaz-Antey Concern抯 Tor-M2E, Bodenseewerk Geratecknik of Germany抯 vertically launched Iris-T, and Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rasanya tak payah ler. Expose sgt menatang ni. Kalao dalam canister to boleh la consider. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #104 curryjames71's post
wa dengar priority MRAD dah jatuh. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #105 tin's post
hearsay x bleh pecaya tin, u know better about that......... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #106 tangopapa's post
Well, I think you know better how far is the truth in the hearsay that I heard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aku tak pandai benda missile ni tapi nak menyibuk jugak...to me daripada tak ada langsung, baik beli KS-1A since itu je yg Gomen mampu untuk isi gaping need for medium range untuk membentuk layered defence AD.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #109 areguard's post
Pakai 2 jenis pon xpe, KS-1 n BUK-M2... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belilah ikut kemampuan dan keperluan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Betul belilah ikut pepatah ukur baju badan sundrii.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bagi saya, KS-1 dah nampak kuno sgt dah. Bile kite dapat bende ni 5-10 tahun dr sekarang dah jadi antik.AKu dengar MAF sendiri tak suka KS-1.
Bagi aku pembelian ni akan bawak byk kesusahan kpd MAF sepertimana pembelian Mig-29.All for so called 'National Interest' at the cost of taxpayer;s miney and national security.
[ Last edited by hijazzains at 22-3-2008 11:21 AM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #113 hijazzains's post
agreed.. nampaknya the purchasing of equipments ni still di takuk lama.lain yg dimintak,lain pulak yg dapat.
kalau perang nanti rasanya suruh JP/KJ etc je la yg operate menatang nih. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nanti manpads FN-6 yg JP sila mane pasang tu entah2 tembak pun takleh... ..kene screw dua kali kang. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #115 hijazzains's post
bunyi macam sea skua test no. 1 dulu jer, tapi tu jerung putih yg bikin.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
are they still considering the KS-1A?? urghhh... we'll be the laughing stock of the region over again.
what la...
cummon man,kalau nak beli,biar la betul2.mahal skit takpe la..what is important is that the system wll be effective when called upon to defend the nation,and not some 'tukun laut' system that only looks like one but doesn't function as well against current and future threats.
kalau takde duit,simpan dulu la..jangan membazir.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guyz, dengo hearsay this FN-6 memang dah masuk dalam inventori tapi tak banyak maybe few units sahaja masa heboh our army wanted this KS-1A. FN-6 ni pun cuma gula-gula for the future would be KS-1A should we decided as a TOT. Alih-alih tembelang sudah pecah pasal the armed force was fed with false fact says that PRC has been equipped with this KS-1A walhal fakta tu tak betul so our planner dah tolak KS-1A ni. Anyway ni cuma hearsay sahaja le! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #119 Canaletto's post
amin. KS-1 mmg patut ditolak bulat2. Hope the MAF is more assertive in future procurements.They should take advantage of the political climate to be more transparent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|