|
Akhirnya, Hadi Bentangkan Usul Pindaan Akta 355 Di Dewan Rakyat
[Copy link]
|
|
cer dgr dulu hujah sokongan dari YB Kota Bharu.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aku siap tepek full teks lagik..yg terer spin2 ni loyer cam ko jer
so skg giliran ko lak tepek bukti statement yg nyatakan arwah sapot 355..boleh tepek bukti?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mari kite mendengar pendapat sisters in islam pulak yg lebih balance
Sisters in Islam (SIS) unequivocally opposes the proposal to amend Act 355 ( RUU 355 ) to increase punishment for shariah crimes to 30 years’ imprisonment, a RM100,000 fine and 100 lashes of the cane from the present limit of three years imprisonment, a RM5000 fine and six lashes of the cane.
RUU 355 is a bill that will potentially result in more injustices in the long run and paint a bad image of Islam as a punitive religion. The public deserves an explanation of the rationale behind the leap in expansion of punishment from the present limit to the proposed limit. Furthermore, how will the shariah court decide on the proportionality of punishment to be given out under the existing Shariah Criminal Offences Enactment (SCOE) of each state? Will the punishment of the crimes be the same or would they differ from state to state?
Under the existing Shariah Criminal Offences (Federal Territories) Act 1997 (SCOA) there are over 40 offences ranging from possession of religious publications contrary to Islamic Law to moral crimes such as khalwat (close proximity), both of which carry the maximum sentence of two years’ jail or a RM3,000 fine or both. With punishment as severe as 30 years’ jail, a RM100,000 fine and 100 lashes in RUU 355 how will the shariah courts be guided to determine that the punishment will not be disproportionate to the crime?
As it stands, the existing SCOE of each state has been implemented in a discriminatory fashion, often targeting minority groups of society and groups of a lower income.
For example, khalwat hotel raids have been largely concentrated in budget hotel areas and the process of these raids completely disregard one’s right to privacy and dignity. Muslim trans-women have been constantly targeted by religious authorities and inhumanely treated by being placed in male prisons, where they are then subject to sexual violence. How will RUU
355 ensure that further discrimination will not happen, once the bill is passed?
Bulldozing a law through parliament will not solve the present inconsistencies and conflict of jurisdiction between civil and shariah courts. While proponents of RUU 355 insist that the bill will not affect non-Muslims, reality shows that existing shariah laws are already impacting non-Muslims in Malaysia.
The unilateral conversion cases of Indira Gandhi and Deepa Subramaniam are just two examples of the far-reaching impact of the dual legal system in Malaysia. Indira’s case has been ongoing for seven years, yet only now discussions on reforming laws pertaining to unilateral conversion of minors have risen. SIS believes that it is irresponsible of politicians to dismiss the fears and concerns of non-Muslims in Malaysia, as they too are equal stakeholders in
RUU 355 .
The systemic weaknesses of shariah courts must be addressed, instead of focusing on increasing punishments. The status of shariah courts can be elevated by improving the implementation of the Islamic Family Law, which Muslim women have often complained is unjust to them. 2015 statistics compiled by SIS’ Telenisa service recorded that the second highest number of cases involved unpaid child maintenance, while the highest was child custody cases.
These cases often continue for years, the main reason being that the ex-husband does not show up to court. Despite this, the shariah courts rarely issue arrest warrants for the men who fail to show up in court, leaving Muslim women bearing the brunt of the injustice.
SIS calls for the state and other proponents of
RUU 355 to focus on Islam’s message of forgiveness and repentance. Allah’s forgiveness and mercy (for both men and women) is a constant and recurring theme that is emphasised in the holy Qur’an as stated in Surah Al-Maidah (5:39) and Surah An-Nur (24:5) which read, “…those who afterward repent and amend their conduct, God is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.”
Why then are our lawmakers more focused on implementing harsher punishments, without providing space for forgiveness and repentance as promoted in Islam? As citizens, we deserve a proper explanation and justification from lawmakers on the effectiveness of retributive justice in reducing “shariah crimes” rather than a blanket explanation that existing punishments are not effective in deterring crimes.
What is abundantly clear is that this proposed legislation has become extremely politicised. The impact of all these political manoeuvrings have raised fears and created a divide between Malaysians.
We call upon all Malaysians, Muslims and non-Muslims alike to make your voices heard. Speak to your family, community, your leaders and express to them your concerns and reservations that this Bill proposes. This is a matter of national interest. All of us have a stake in this. It is time for the voices of the people to come together and reject a future that undermines our unity and threatens our way of life.
http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com ... ness-repentance-in- ruu - 355 / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eh.. main konar2 pulak.. Dia yg gigih duk tepek konon kata NIk Aziz tolak.. Bila kantoi takde keterangan jelas yg Nik Aziz tolak, main pusing plak suh kita tepek bukti Nik Aziz sokong plak dah.. Sapa yg duk canang kata Nik Aziz tolak ni?? Aku ke ko?? Ko yg dakwa Nik Aziz tolak.. Prinsip dlm undang2, beban pembuktian terletak ke atas yang mendakwa... Ko nak konar apa ni??
Dah makin tinggi misai aku terangkat senyum ni... Terjongket2 dah misai aku ni...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dlm konteks ini,iols akan berganding bahu dgn siti kassim, marina mahathir,ambiga,zarinah anwar,nik edlin,diyana sofea,taslima nasrin amina wadud segale bagai utk mempertahankan hak feminin dr lobai2 yg ingin mencabuli hak wanita thru ruu355,sesungguhnye kite x akan benarkan diri diliwat dgn halal oleh suami,xkan biarkan perkahwinan bwh umur kanak2 perempuan oleh lobai2 pedophilia,xkan melakukan oral sex pd zakar suami di atas unta, hak kebebasan utk say No pd paksaan sex oleh suami dan segala hak feminin yg lain,kite xkan membiarkan ruu355 menindas kaum wanita titik . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namirulmukminin replied at 7-4-2017 03:17 PM
Diam psl malas nak layan putar belit cai2 DApig.. Kalu sebelum ni, BN taknak bentang, hangpa duk m ...
Mana de dibantah time bentang. Yang dibantah adalah penangguhan perbahasan usul. Kenapa nak tangguh sedangkan baru pukul 4ptg. Kelmarin dulu bangga pecah rekod bersidang smpai 20jam. Time nak bahas usul hadi xboleh pulak. Xnmpak lgi ke walaun? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kecimpret replied at 7-4-2017 03:35 PM
parti2 Sarawak pun dah mula paham cam MIC nampaknya
Cc @namirulmukminin . Kau xlepak dgan puak2 sabah srwak ke nih mirul? Diorang xpaham2 lgi ni. Mic pon sebenarnya xpaham jugak, kau lepak dgan subramaniam pakgad taman rumah kau ke? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qumbu replied at 7-4-2017 03:35 PM
Bawa bertenang.....sabarrrrr dulu...kan ditanggohkan pada Julai 2017....lebeh molek lagi tak perlu d ...
Laa kalau awal2 dah tau sapa undi ya atau tak, buat apa bentang usul lagi? Sia2 je lah kerja yg pas buat kan? Kantoi mudah disitu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sepatutnya RUU355 ni kena bahas..biar MP non Muslim paham....aku sebagai penyokong RUU355 pon terkejut tindakan speaker....mcm azalina baca penangguhan tu...reaksi mukanya seolah2 tergesa...speaker sakit perut kot
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sabar hakak...kan dah ditanggoh ke Julai 2017...kita tunggu dan lihat jer...moleknya tak perlu bahas...teros undi YA atau TIDAK...bior puas hati semua orang kan...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tu kan hari khamis.. Malam tu kan malam jumaat.... Tak reti2 nak hormat sensitiviti umat islam ke? Aku pon kalu khamis petang, keje mesti nk balik awal.. Mlm pulak lepas solat isya' nak ehem2 dgn bini aku.. Ehem2 mlm jumaat sedap dapat, pahala pon dapat tau sebab memenuhi kewajipan sebagai suami.. Hihihihihihi...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the_killer replied at 7-4-2017 04:11 PM
sepatutnya RUU355 ni kena bahas..biar MP non Muslim paham....aku sebagai penyokong RUU355 pon terk ...
Kalau bahas lah kita boleh tgok point2 sokongan atau bantahan dan kemudian rakyat sendiri nilaikan. Aku saspek lobai2 yg bawak usul ni pon xdpt nak pertahankan point sendiri. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namirulmukminin replied at 7-4-2017 04:21 PM
Tu kan hari khamis.. Malam tu kan malam jumaat.... Tak reti2 nak hormat sensitiviti umat islam ke? ...
Pale otak lobai pk pasal ngesek ngan bini jah malam jemat sebab tu xleh nak teruskan perbahasan. Point yg bodoh, nextt!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eh.. aku ngesex dgn bini aku.. ko sakit ati pehal??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tak semestinya....semua segala usul dah ready dari segi hujah....tunggulah next dewan rakyat ...apa pon aku sokong naik taraf mahkamah syariah di malaysia...cuma dengan penangguhan ni boleh menyebabkan polemik perbalahan secara berterusan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namirulmukminin replied at 7-4-2017 04:23 PM
Eh.. aku ngesex dgn bini aku.. ko sakit ati pehal??
Tiba2 nak lari isu pulak. Isu dekat sini kenapa xteruskan perbahasan usul sedangkan masih awal jam 4ptg padahal sebelum tu bangga dgan 20jam persidangan. Tak lain tak bukan adalah utk drag issue ni smpai ke pru14 supaya dpt jadi modal lobai2 utk tarik undi melayu. Dlm masa yg sama dpt tunjukkan yang umngok bersungguh nak menyokong usul tersebut sedangkan mereka pergunakan isu ni utk tujuan politik semata2. Tapi walaun2 butakan mata pekakkakkan telinga dgan kenyataan sebenar smbil melompat2 kegirangan dpt BENTANG usul je pon. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sebelum bentang sudah ada bantahan untuk menghalang pembentangan..
Tempoh kira-kira 30 minit sebelum Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang (Pas-Marang) membentangkan Rang Undang-undang (RUU) 355 menyaksikan sidang Dewan Rakyat dilanda 'ribut' apabila berlaku pertikaman lidah antara ahli parlimen kerajaan dan pembangkang.
Terdahulu, berlaku perdebatan antara Gobind Singh Deo (DAP-Puchong) Datuk Takiyuddin Hassan (Pas-Kota Bharu) berhubung isu penyerahan notis dan saman pemula kepada Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia oleh anak bekas Timbalan Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr Ismail Abd Rahman semalam.
Bagaimananapun, beberapa ahli parlimen BN kemudiannya bangkit menjerit termasuk mengeluarkan maki hamun ketika Lim Kit Siang (DAP-Gelang Patah) turut berdiri mempersoalkan RUU Hadi.
"Bisinglah. Duduklah. Ini provokasi hanya mahu kelirukan rakyat," jerit Datuk Seri Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim (BN-Baling) manakala Datuk Othman Abdul (BN-Pendang) turut beberapa kali bangun memekik antaranya, "Makin tua, makin gila."
Kit Siang antara lain mempersoal sejauh mana pembentangan RUU 355 hari ini turut dipersetujui parti komponen BN lain.
"Ini permintaan kerajaan. Presiden MCA, Gerakan adakah setuju?" soalnya lagi diikuti sorakan bantahan berterusan daripada ahli parlimen kerajaan. Speaker Dewan Rakyat, Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia kemudiannya mengingatkan ahli parlimen duduk supaya Abdul Hadi dapat membentangkan RUU 355 yang tertangguh sejak tahun lalu.
"Ahli-ahli Berhomrat yang lain, politik itu bawa di luar sana. Jangan buat (gaduh) di sini," sebelum membenarkan Abdul Hadi meneruskan pembentangan pada pukul 11.38 pagi tadi. RUU Hadi untuk meminda Akta Mahkamah Syariah (Bidang Kuasa Jenayah) dengan meningkatkan had hukuman penjara 30 tahun, denda RM100,000 dan 100 sebatan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well.. Itu kan sepak terajang politik.. Pokoknya DAPig takut ke kalah PRU sebab isu ni?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
betul....walau speaker ada hak nak tangguh ...dalam konteks isu kritikal seperti RUU355 sepatutnya tak perlu tangguh dah...even2 YB dari PAS pon terkejut...adakah BN dalam tu yang sokong sekadar pura2 sokong....so kena tunggu nex dewan rakyat....kalo next dewan rakyat pon tangguh...tangguh dan tangguh...nampak sgt dah tu
masa sesi perbahasan sokongan YB Kota Bharu...ade juga MP non muslim dah paham...bila Pandikar tangguh perbahasan...ini akan menyebabkan RUU355 tu kekal menjadi perdebatan sampai bila2 dan polimik politik...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terimakasih untuk penerangan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|