CariDotMy

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

12Next
Return to list New
View: 4043|Reply: 22

what "THING" v can get from China?!

[Copy link]
Post time 8-11-2009 04:57 PM | Show all posts |Read mode
what "THING" v can get from China?!

according to Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) chief Jeneral Datuk Seri Rodzali Daud said "Malaysia was also looking into acquiring some Chinese military ware." (can refer following report from http://forum.cari.com.my/viewthread.php?tid=426175&extra=page%3D1&page=57)

if the statement is true, what weapon/system will ATM purchase from china?

Let's open a discussion over here.

the potential equipment in my mind are

The PLZ-45 is a 155 mm
(ligher & cheaper than K-9 and Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh are using it)

125 mm ammunition for PT-91M
(wat v brough from Pretis are just for training)

more FN-6 or even FN-16 for very short-range SAM
(replace RMAF and RMN starburst, if possible ToT to us for local production and hv our own MANPADS)

SMART HUNTER TH-S311
(v need tis low-altitude missile combat command system for our MANPADS)

KS-1A medium-range SAM
(v lack of budget, KS-1A is jst a good to hv medium-range SAM)

Type 90 35mm twin cannon
(licensed copy from Oerlikon 35mm, GDF-002)

I dun thk v should look for China fighter jet, but if jst get spare part for our su-30mkm ok la.
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 8-11-2009 05:43 PM | Show all posts
KD Sri Inderapura replacement?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2009 06:26 PM | Show all posts
The C-802 missiles are worth looking into for the NGPV. They are actually copies of the exocet.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2009 07:22 PM | Show all posts
2# mentosonline
Statement was from RMAF chief not RMN. However I do not think Malaysia will ever go for PRC made ship though it is cheaper than Korea.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2009 07:41 PM | Show all posts
2# mentosonline  
Statement was from RMAF chief not RMN. However I do not think Malaysia will ever go for PRC made ship though it is cheaper than Korea.
Canaletto Post at 8-11-2009 19:22

I agree, the QC in the past has been poor. Contoh semasa thailand beli kapal from china.. bnyk masalah kan. ..walaupun pada harga 'friendly prices'. Kalau tak silap, Kereta kebal yg thai beli dari china juga mengundang masalah tak tahan lasak, betul kan?
Masa perang iran-iraq.. apc dari china juga mudah dimusnahkn bila kena bedilan dari pihak musuh... small calibre cannons.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2009 08:03 PM | Show all posts
nak dptkan kungfu scrol .. he he ...

mungkin nak beli peralatan logistik ... ntah .. tak tau
Reply

Use magic Report

Follow Us
Post time 8-11-2009 08:22 PM | Show all posts
4# Canaletto

I beleive the Chinese designed Luhu and Luhai(correct me if I am wrong) designs were rejected by their navy, hence only one unit of these two classes were ever built. That's why PRC's ordered Sovrenmy class destroyers from Russia as they have no confident in the design of these Chinese made destroyers.

[img]http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:cTvb7OBKS6YAOM:[/img]
Luhu Class.REJECTED

[img]http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:VDt8oOGfIdTp0M:http://forum.globaltimes.cn/foru ... D1%26d%3D1250843172[/img]
Luhai Class: REJECTED

However, the Pakistani navy did order frigates(F-22P design) from China and I believe one of them visited Port Klang on its way to Pakistani and apparentky Malaysian journalists were among the first foreigners to access the frigates during the visit. Any news on this, perhaps someone have made a review/observation on the quality of those Chinese made Pakistani frigates.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2009 09:56 PM | Show all posts
4# Canaletto

Oh gancity was talking about 155mm artillery and 125mm tank ammunition, so I assumed a larger scope.
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


 Author| Post time 8-11-2009 10:26 PM | Show all posts
3# hijazzains

there is a chinese defence magazine get source from TNI, 1 of it C802 during "testing" fly "elsewhere"...
the china side say the problem mayb cause by unstable sea
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 8-11-2009 10:57 PM | Show all posts
What about missiles and bombs?  Things like Red Mud.  Or those that can be delivered by the Su-30 or Scorpene?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 9-11-2009 02:18 AM | Show all posts
nak dptkan kungfu scrol .. he he ...

mungkin nak beli peralatan logistik ... ntah .. tak tau
manusia biasa Post at 8-11-2009 20:03

kungfu scroll tu dapat separuh je pasal lagi separuh tu anak murid yg jahat dah curi
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 9-11-2009 02:19 AM | Show all posts
china punya electronics elok tak? how's its review?
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 9-11-2009 08:41 AM | Show all posts
3# hijazzains  

there is a chinese defence magazine get source from TNI, 1 of it C802 during "testing" fly "elsewhere"...
the china side say the problem mayb cause by unstable sea
gancity Post at 8-11-2009 22:26


Lesson: 'buy original'
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 9-11-2009 08:57 AM | Show all posts
i like KS-1A..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 9-11-2009 09:58 AM | Show all posts
KS-1A medium-range SAM
(v lack of budget, KS-1A is jst a good to hv medium-range SAM)


KS-1A ... not because of its effectiveness, but the potential ToT. We buy the missiles, design, technology by lock, stock & barrel.

Than we improved the darn thing. Drp KS-1A, jadi KRIS-A+. Tu br betul.

Kita xde duit nak beli fighter bebyk. Baik develop misil from existing missile tech. Blh mass produced, cheap & effective (if done right).

A USD $200K missile downing a USD $250 million worth of fighter .... see the cost involved. More bang for bucks ..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 9-11-2009 10:24 AM | Show all posts
Barangan dari Chinese dri dulu smpi sekarang low quality, even chinese malaysia pun tak nak beli barang dri China ... tapi klu setakat nak test2 boleh la
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


Post time 9-11-2009 11:11 AM | Show all posts
16# dcc01

apa pulak taknak..tu chinese dolls bersepah...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 9-11-2009 12:20 PM | Show all posts
Kualiti tak kualiti. MAF kita ni sentiase je tak cukup dana. So seperti pepatah mat salleh, 'Beggars can't be choosers'. Aku rasa nanti kita akhirnya akan beli barangan China utk MAF sbb bajet MAF tiap2 tahun makin kecil.
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 9-11-2009 12:58 PM | Show all posts
MAF kita ni sentiase je tak cukup dana.


Dulu, cukup dana, yg 2nd-hand, 3rd-hand jadi pilihan (PERISTA). Nyesal tak sudah bab flying coffin Skyhawk tuh.

Skang, kita go 1st hand je. Kualiti, bukan kuantiti keutamaan. Mmg la sore point pesal kuantiti, tp kita leh built up 8, 18, 48 at a time (ATM suke no. 8 nih ... )

So seperti pepatah mat salleh, 'Beggars can't be choosers'.


Sapa kata kita beggars ... tp choosy ya amat. Mcm2 ada dlm inventori, Rusia ada, Amerika ada, Brazil ada, UK ada, France ada ... China pon ada.

Macam2 ada ...

Aku rasa nanti kita akhirnya akan beli barangan China utk MAF sbb bajet MAF tiap2 tahun makin kecil.


Aku nampak, cuma mid-range SAMs. Lain, cuma spare part Sukhoi. Tu je ..
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 9-11-2009 01:03 PM | Show all posts
KS-1A ... not because of its effectiveness, but the potential ToT. We buy the missiles, design, technology by lock, stock & barrel.

Than we improved the darn thing. Drp KS-1A, jadi KRIS-A+. Tu  ...
robotech Post at 9-11-2009 09:58


aku setuju...dah lama aku pikirkan...tapi asal org2 kita benci sngt product china???? kan diaorg sudi ToT....lama dah aku bangkitkan soal ni tapi ade la certain2 forumer mmg pangkah habis kat aku..
Reply

Use magic Report

12Next
Return to list New
You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

ADVERTISEMENT



 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CariDotMy

20-11-2024 09:40 AM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.071632 second(s), 32 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list