CariDotMy

 Forgot password?
 Register

ADVERTISEMENT

View: 1551|Reply: 2

Intraconazole

[Copy link]
Post time 5-10-2011 02:11 PM | Show all posts |Read mode
Saya telah mengambil Intraconazole semasa saya 4 minggu pregnant.Sekarang saya 6 minggu pregnant, baru saya tahu ubat ini bahaya untuk pregnancy.Apa boleh saya buat?
Reply

Use magic Report


ADVERTISEMENT


 Author| Post time 5-10-2011 02:16 PM | Show all posts
Salah taip...ITRACONAZOLE...
Reply

Use magic Report

Post time 5-10-2011 11:15 PM | Show all posts
bincang ngan doc...

ada jumpa kajian ni
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

First-trimester itraconazole exposure and pregnancy outcome: a prospective cohort study of women contacting teratology information services in Italy.
De Santis M, Di Gianantonio E, Cesari E, Ambrosini G, Straface G, Clementi M.
Source

Telefono Rosso-Teratology Information Service, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. [email protected]
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Itraconazole is an effective fungal treatment; however, there are few human data on prenatal exposure.
OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the major malformation rate in itraconazole prenatally exposed infants. The secondary objective includes evaluation of the pregnancy outcome.
METHODS:

A prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2002 to October 2006 in women who called two Italian Teratology Information Services (TIS). Pregnant women who were exposed to itraconazole during the first trimester and gave informed consent were matched with a contemporary group of pregnant women who contacted the TIS because they had undergone a non-teratogenic drug exposure during the first trimester. Information was obtained via a structured questionnaire at the time of the initial call to the TIS and no earlier than 1 month after delivery. A trained operator conducted the interview. The main outcome measure was information about major congenital anomalies, type of delivery, birth weight, and any pregnancy or neonatal complications.
RESULTS:

Data were collected on 206 women who called the TIS because of first-trimester exposure to itraconazole, and 207 controls. There were no significant differences in terms of major congenital anomalies in the exposed group versus the control group (3/163 [1.8%] vs 4/190 [2.1%], respectively). There was no statistical difference in the rate of vaginal delivery between the exposed and control groups (101/162 [62.3%] vs 102/190 [53.8%]), premature birth (11/162 [6.8%] vs 15/190 [7.9%]), low birth weight (1/152 [0.7%] vs 4/175 [2.3%]) and high birth weight (10/152 [6.5%] vs 7/175 [4.0%], respectively). The rates of live births (163/206 [79.1%] vs 190/207 [91.8%]), spontaneous abortion (23/206 [11.2%] vs 10/207 [4.8%]) and termination of pregnancy (19/206 [9.2%] vs 7/207 [3.4%] in the exposed and control groups, respectively) were significantly different (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION:

First-trimester itraconazole-exposed infants were not at increased risk of major congenital anomalies, but the rates of spontaneous and induced abortion were higher in the exposed group versus the control group. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these observations.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19338381
Reply

Use magic Report

You have to log in before you can reply Login | Register

Points Rules

 

Category: Kesihatan


ADVERTISEMENT



 

ADVERTISEMENT


 


ADVERTISEMENT
Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT


Mobile|Archiver|Mobile*default|About Us|CariDotMy

19-1-2025 02:19 PM GMT+8 , Processed in 0.044076 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On, Redis On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

Quick Reply To Top Return to the list