|
|
[Tempatan]
Kerabat johor pertahankan kaumnya tak tutup aurat
[Copy link]
|
|
|
|
Biarlah nak bertudung atau pun tidak. Itu antara dia dengan Allah. Bukannya kita semua tidak tahu bahawa dalam al-quran pun ada menyebut tentang kewajipan seorang wanita Islam untuk menutup aurat dan aurat wanita termasuklah rambut .... Wallah hu' allam. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nak kasi info kat orang kena betul uols...
kita bukan orang arab... kita melayu....ahaks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by cakciboojaki at 1-10-2015 05:18 PM
Mail n d gang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
leh x samakan dia ni ngan Ahmad Maslan???
anak raja ke hatta raja sekalipun dan manusia2 lain kalau dah jahil...tempatnya neraka!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author |
Post time 1-10-2015 10:31 PM
From the mobile phone
|
Show all posts
pearlady replied at 1-10-2015 10:01 PM
leh x samakan dia ni ngan Ahmad Maslan???
anak raja ke hatta raja sekalipun dan manusia2 lain kal ...
asalkan johorean |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by oni313 at 1-10-2015 11:16 PM
tak tahu la nak cakap apa pasal royalties johor ni...
even diorg sendiri pun tak berapa hormat dengan rakyat, camne la rakyat nak respect kalau approach royalties johor ni pun camtu....
tak semestinya kaya raya, boleh cakap apa yg nak dicakap sesuka hati... attitude is much important daripada harta yg berkoyan2 tu...
bila ada org comment kat IG tu, kalau komen tu cam sarkastik, tak perlu lah nak reply sentap bagai....
kalau tak nak dicerca, jangan buat akau IG hatta twitter sekalipun....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Itu hari aku pergi orang kawin duduk satu malam. Penuh dengan orang Johor.
Tah mcm mana masuk bab raja dorang masa borak2 malam tu.
Punya lah dorang ni bangga dengan sultan dorang ni, datuk2 sultan Johor ni.
Kaya giler lah, baik lah, mengerti isi hati rakyat lah, sultan redah kampong lah, sultan dorang berani lah, sultan ada ilmu lah. Sampai periuk belanga sultan Johor pun dorang cerita
Aku iyer kan jer lah labu... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sebelum pasukan jdt naik ni, aku tak tahu yg org johor perangai mcm ni yakni, berbangga over sangat dgn sultan
seolah2 sebelum ni mereka tak ada sultanmcm negeri lain
agaknya org johor nak tunjuk "aku pun ada sultan, sultan aku hebat" kot dgn org negeri lain?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lu mualaf? baru belajar islam berapa minggu? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bukan takrif manusia biasa tapi dari manusia yg dilantik menjadi Rasul.
"Wahai anakku Fatimah! Adapun perempuan-perempuan yang akan digantung rambutnya hingga mendidih otaknya dalam neraka adalah mereka itu di dunia tidak mahu menutup rambutnya daripada dilihat oleh lelaki yang bukan mahramnya." (Riwayat Bukhari dan Muslim)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kepala Hotak Kau Jawa Dalam Tempurung |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Itu hadis palsu.
http://en.islamtoday.net/node/1178
Sheikh `Umar al-Muqbil, professor at al-Imam University
The hadîth that the Prophet (peace be upon him) saw a woman hanging in the Hellfire by her hair was cited in a narration allegedly by `Ali b. Abî Talib from the Prophet (peace be upon him). It is a long hadîth depicting many frightening and horrible things.
However, it is a false hadîth concocted and disseminated by some ignorant people in order to frighten women. It is unlawful to fabricate hadîth and to lie to frighten people.
The eminent scholar Sheikh Bin Baz has already issued a verdict on the falseness of this hadîth [Verdict No. 19493].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fire_place: Bio lah dia nak btudung ke x..tu hak dia dan masalah dia ngn pencipta.Mmg bagus yg tegur,tp kdg2 tegur xbertempat...Bab org nak pakai tudung ke tak tu ...
just my 2 cents opinion....
people use social media
1-...utk nak keep in touch dgn family or kawan2...
2-nak share dgn public....
well...part yg nak share dgn public tu...kena la hadap kan..dgn pro & con...
sbb
3- media sosial also..digunakan for "freedom of speech"....translate in malay...."kebebasan utk menghencap"..bleh?...ahahah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minta maaf tersebar hadis palsu.astagfirullah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by wwwvvvwww at 4-10-2015 02:51 PM
Jilbab dalam surah alAhzab ayat 59 ialah baju biasa.Tak diketahui secara terperinci rupebentuknya oleh sesiapa yang hidup selepas zaman Rasulullah. Maka berdondonglah tukang lagak serba tahu yang pakai bermacam jenis gelaran buat tafsiran sendiri dengan merujuk kepada pakaian rahib kristian. Kemudian terus dimasukkan dalam kamus yang mendakwa kononnya pakaian ciptaan mereka itu adalah jilbab dari zaman Nabi.
Kita bicara tentang cara berpakaian satu masyarakat pada era ia masih menanggap pendedahan buah dada di tempat awam menjadi suatu kebiasaan. Sekiranya rambut wanita adalah aurat pasti Allah swt telah sebutkannya sekali dalam surah 24:31. Bukannya diperintah tutup tetek saja. Sedangkan buah dada disebut secara khusus. Inikan pula rambut panjang mengurai yang lebih luas permukaannya.
Menerusi surah alAhzab ayat 59, muslimat disuruh "rapatkan ke atas mereka dari (sebahagian) jilbab mereka" "yudnina alaihinna min jalaabibihinna"
Bila perkataan rapatkan digunakan ia bermakna bahawa pakaian berkenaan telahpun dikenakan tapi dalam keadaan longgar atau terbuka.
"dari jilbab mereka" "min jalabibihinna" pula bermaksud baju jilbab sedia ada sudah cukup untuk melaksanakan arahan ini. Tak perlu tambah saiz atau ditukar bentuk asal
"alaihinna" pula bermaksud ke atas mereka.Tiada apa yang luarbiasa tentang penggunaan istilah ini. Apabila kita memakai baju, kita rapatkan baju ke atas kulit kita.
Satu perkara penting yang perlu disedari ialah tiada langsung istilah "seluruh" tubuh seperti tertera dalam terjemahan songsang yang berlelusa hari ini. Ayat itu hanya memerintahkan muslimat memakai baju dengan sempurna. Menutup bahagian tubuh yang biasanya ditutup oleh baju sahaja dan bukannya seluruh tubuh.
Seperkara lagi, baju bukan sesuatu yang hanya dipakai ketika keluar rumah saja. Perbuatan menambah "apabila keluar rumah" ke dalam tafsiran ayat itu memperlihatkan kejahilan pentafsir itu sendiri.
Hanya izar iaitu kain lilit pinggang dipakai oleh muslimat sebelum turun ayat 31 surah anNur pada tahun 5 Hijrah. Kemudian jilbab iaitu baju pula di mestikan setelah keluar surah alAhzab ayat 59. Berserta dengan arahan memakainya dengan mengenakan semua butang atau ikatan dan tidak terbuka sebahagian atau sepenuhnya hingga terdedah perut seperti difahamkan sering dilakukan sehingga saat itu.
Maka takrif aurat wanita yang jelas dapat diperolehi dari 3 dalil kuat yakni
1)sahih bukhari jilid60 hadis no282 dari mana diketahui aurat di bawah pinggang telahpun sediakala ditutup maka tak perlu diperintahkan lagi .
2)Pendedahan buah dada pula tidak dibenarkan mulai tahun 5 Hijrah dengan terbitnya surah 24:31.
3)Manakala bahagian antara buah dada dan pinggang menyusul sebagai aurat dengan ayat 33:59 setahun kemudian.
Apa yang pasti rambut telah jelas dibuktikan sebagai bukan aurat. Persoalannya sekarang ialah sama ada lengan itu aurat atau bukan. Dan hingga ke mana pula izar yang dipakai wanita zaman rasulullah ? Sampai ke lutut kaa....ke pergelangan kaki ka....ke bawah tapak kaki hingga tak boleh berjalan dan terpaksa melompat lompat macam pocong ka....
Kedua dua ayat 24:31 dan 33:59 diturunkan pastinya akibat tabiat berpakaian wanita arab secara semula jadi lagi iaitu majoritinya cuma memakai kain lilit pinggang(izar). Kemungkinan besar disebabkan kemiskinan. Yang mampu beli baju (jilbab atau rida') pula gemar memakainya dengan tidak sempurna.
Maka segala macam dongeng dicipta oleh cucu cicit orang arab zaman nabi untuk menutup rahsia cara berpakaian nenek moyang mereka yang agak mengaibkan. Kononnya Siti Aishah, serta sahabat Nabi seperti ibn Masud, ibnu Abbas dan lain lain mentakrifkan khimar dan jilbab sebagai penutup kepala, penutup muka , jubah, selendang, kain besar dan bermacam lagi.Akibatnya kita yang hidup di zaman terkemudian ini ramai sangat lah tertipu .Pakaian wanita arab sebelum 5 hijrah yang kononnya telah menutup dari hujung rambut hingga hujung kaki masih ada lagi dianggap tidak lengkap oleh Allah swt hingga perlu ditambah penutup hodoh hodoh, pelik pelik & tak masuk akal.
Begitu juga dengan maksud "perhiasan yang biasanya kelihatan" dalam surah anNur ayat 31. Kalau diserahkan kepada minda luar tabii, sama ada dari kalangan ulama atau bukan, mereka sudah tentu mentafsirkannya berlandaskan citarasa sendiri iaitu pakaian biarawati nasrani
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tak mengapa. Penyelewengan, pemalsuan dan pencemeran hukum Allah dalam pelbagai bentuk telah lama berada di tahap tenat. Maka sama samalah kita semua saling memperingati
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Memakai tudung atas nama Islam adalah perbuatan menyembah ulama sebagai tuhan"
"Menutup rambut diwajibkan dalam Injil. Bukan dalam alQuran"
"Orang Islam pemakai tudung litup adalan penganut kristian yang baik"
http://www.ahl-alquran.com/English/show_article.php?main_id=6008
What the Bible says about Hijab?
The wearing of the head covering for women is not part of the Prophet’s teachings and is not found in the Qur’an. It is a belief and a practice that was taken by the early Muslim scholars from the Christian Bible. 1Cor 11:5 — but any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled dishonors her head-it is the same as if her head were shaven.11:6 For if a woman will not veil herself, then she should cut off her hair; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her wear a veil. 11:10 That is why a woman ought to have a veil on her head, because of the angels. 11:13 Judge for yourselves; is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered?
 
So the commandment for a woman to cover her head is in the Bible. This belief has seeped into the Muslim belief and has now become part and parcel of the practice of Islam today. The West has no problem with Catholicism putting its nuns in head cover. In Europe today Catholic schools still encourage young girls to take up the wearing of the Catholic head-cover. Unfortunately under the guise of modernity, a vast majority of Christians themselves today are not following the teachings of the Bible - the large majority of Christian women do not cover the head. Hence, it is the Muslim Ummah who are very good Christians because they still uphold these Bible teachings.
 
Where this idea came from?
Historically, While many Muslims call “Hijab”, an Islamic dress code, they completely ignore the fact that, Hijab as a dress code has nothing to do with Islam and nothing to do with the Qur’an.
In reality, “Hijab” is an old Jewish tradition that infiltrated into the Hadith books like many innovations that contaminated Islam through alleged Hadith and Sunnah. Any student of the Jewish traditions will see that head cover for the Jewish woman is encouraged by the Rabbis and religious leaders. Religious Jewish women still cover their heads most of the time and especially in the synagogues, weddings, and religious festivities. This Jewish tradition is a cultural, not a religious one. Hijab was observed by the women of the civilizations that preceded the Jews and passed down to the Jewish culture.
 
Christian women cover their heads on many religious occasions while the nuns cover their heads all the time. This religious practice of covering the head was established from traditions thousands of years before the Muslim scholars claimed the Hijab as part of the Muslim women’s dress code. The traditional Arabs of all religions, Jews, Christians and Muslims used to wear “Hijab,” not because of Islam, but because of tradition.
In Saudi Arabia, up to this minute most of the men cover their head, not because of Islam but because of tradition. Thank God this tradition for men has not been counted as Islamic dress code yet!
 
North Africa is known for its Tribe that have the Muslim men wearing “Hijab” instead of women. Here the tradition has the Hijab in reverse. If wearing Hijab is the exclusive sign of a pious and righteous woman, why do we see so many women wear  Hijab,  completely disregarding other essentials of modesty, like wearing tight shirts and jeans, showing the body parts that must be concealed, plus immodest behavior? In brief, Hijab is a tradition and it has nothing to do with Islam.
 
Mixing religion with tradition is a form of idol-worship, because not knowing (or not trying to find out) what God asked us to do in His Book, the Qur’an, is a sign of disregarding God and His Message. When tradition supersedes God’s Commandment, the true religion (Deen) takes a second place. But God is always the First and never the second.
 
What the Qur’an says about Khimar?
The word “Khimar” and the dress code for women can be found in the Qur’an 24:31. Some Muslims quote this verse as a commandment for Hijab, or head cover by pointing to the word, khomorehenna, (‘their chest covering’ from Khimar), forgetting that God has already used the word Hijab, several times in the Qur’an. Those blessed by God can see that the use of the word “Khimar” in this verse is not for “Hijab” nor for head cover. Those who quote this verse usually add (Head cover or veil) after the word Khomorehenna, and usually between brackets, because it is their addition to the verse of God. Here is 24:31.
 
24:31 And tell the believing women to lower their gaze, and guard their modesty. They should not show off their adornment beyond what may be decently and spontaneously apparent. Let them cover their chest area with a light covering. Most of the translators, obviously influenced by fabricated Hadith translate the word as VEIL and thus mislead people into believing that this verse is advocating the covering of the head and face.
 
 24:31, God is telling the women to use their cover (Khimar, being a dress, a coat, a shawl, a shirt, a blouse, a tie, a scarf  etc.) to cover their bosoms, not their heads or their hair. If God willed to order the women to cover their heads or their hair, He would have simply said, “Cover your head and hair.” God is neither vague nor forgetful! God does not run out of words. He does not wait for a scholar to put the correct words for Him!  The Arabic word for Chest (Jayb) is in the verse 24:31, but the Arabic words for Head (Ra’as) or Hair (Sha’r) are NOT in the verse. The Commandment in the verse is clear - Cover your chest.
 
The last part of the verse 24:31 translates as, “They shall not strike their feet when they walk in order to shake and reveal certain details of their bodies. The details of the body can be revealed or not revealed by the dress you wear, not by your head cover. The word Zeenatahunna in this verse refers to the woman’s body parts (hidden beauty). At the end of the verse, God tells the women not to strike their feet to show their Zeenah. A woman does not need to strike her feet to show her ornaments but the way she strikes her feet while walking can reveal certain parts of the body.
 
Accepting orders from others than God is idol-worship. That is how serious the matter of Hijab/Khimar is. Is it possible that women who wear Hijab in the name of Islam, believing that God has ordered it are committing idol-worship as God did not order it? No, the ‘Imams’ did. These women have found for themselves gods other than the One Who revealed the Qur’an, complete, perfect and fully detailed.
Jelbab  in the Qur’an means draw a shawl over yourself .
The first regulation of the dress code for Muslim women is in 7:26, the second in 24:31 as we have seen and the third is in 33:59.
 
7:26 O Children of Adam! We have provided you with garments to cover your bodies as well as to adorn you. The best garment for you to wear, in addition, is good conduct. These are the verses of God that they must take to heart.
 
24:31 And tell the believing women to lower their gaze, and guard their modesty. They should not show off their adornment beyond what may be decently and spontaneously apparent. Let them cover their chest area with a light covering.
 
33:59 O Prophet! Tell your wives, your daughters, and women of the believers that they should draw their shawls over their person (when in public). This is easy and proper, so that they may be recognized and not be bothered. God is Absolver of imperfections, Merciful.
Here God sets the other regulation for the dress code for women during the Prophet’s life. This verse does not only address the wives of the Prophet, but also wives of the believers, and therefore, to all believing women.
 
Hard ship in Religion:
God ordains that those who would reject His Book and go look for other sources for guidance will suffer in this life and in the Hereafter by their own choice. We repeatedly find in the Qur’an that God never desires any hardship in religion. But the ‘Imams’, in their inflated egos, invented their own laws in defiance of God and made Islam impossible to practice. They enslaved Muslims by regulating everything in their daily lives. Only a few examples out of the countless: Which side you must sleep on, which foot you must step in and out of the house, what to recite on entering and exiting the toilet, which foot would enter the toilet and which one will exit, what to do with a fly in your soup, using the left hand in most situations would be accursed, what to say and recite when having intercourse with your spouse etc !
 
Those who believe that The Qur’an is complete, perfect and fully detailed, will have everything easy for them as God promises, while those who seek sources other than the Qur’an will suffer all the hardship in this life and in the life to come. In the Hereafter they will complain to God, “We were not idol-worshipers,” but God knows best, they were. (See 6:21-24)
 
CONCLUSION:
God, the Most Merciful, gave us three basic rules for the Dress Code for Women in Islam.
ONE: The best garment is that of nice, modest conduct (7:26).
TWO: Cover your chest in the presence of unrelated men. (24:31)
THREE: Draw a shawl around yourself when outdoors in public. (33:59)
 
While these three basic rules are not enough for those who do not trust God, the true believers know that God is ENOUGH. After these three basic rules every woman can adjust her dress according to a particular situation. Any addition to these basic Qur’anic rules is an attempt to correct God or improve on His Infinite Wisdom. We have no obligation to follow but God’s Rules, just as His Messenger did all the time. Innovations and fabrications that add countless rules to the women dress code are nothing but idol-worship and should be rejected. Stay with God; that is where the winners go.
 Anyone who preaches the non-Qur’anic Hijab, Veil, or Beard , it is False, Manmade, ‘Imamist’ version.
 
Just for the sake of argument: What Body Parts Women Can Show In Public? Face, hands and forearms, heads, feet and ankles as during ablution. See 5:6. A Hadith that agrees with the Qur’an: Ibn Umar said that during the times of Rasoolullah (S) men and women used to do Wudhu together. – Bukhari, Kitab al Wuhu .
|
Rate
-
1
View Rating Log
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bertudung tapi x tutup aurat, berpakaian tapi telanjang, bertudung bukan sebab syariat islam, tapi trend & nak orang tertarik....spe yg nak ditarik tu,lelaki...
hijabista, stylista, jilboobs = tabarruj
jap lagi ada yg marah & sentap tu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
was narrated that Ibn ‘Umar (may Allah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allah (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) said: “Whoever lets his garment drag out of pride, Allah will not look at him on the Day of Resurrection.” Umm Salamah said: What should women do with their hems? He said: “They should let them down a hand span.” She said: Then their feet will show. He said: “Then let it down a cubit, but no more than that.” Narrated by al-Tirmidhi (1731); he said: This is a saheeh hasan hadeeth. Also narrated by al-Nasaa’i (5336). The hadeeth was classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah, 1864.
Women's hems could be lengthened by a full cubit ? Wowwww !!
Lets analyze that hadith closely. Extending the hems by a handspan leave only the feet uncovered. Makes you wonder how a person could walk at all with another forearms length added down her feet.
And if the Messenger of Allah wanted to make it complsory to cover the feet why did he wait until someone asked about womens hem ? Never mind the Apostle giving an answer falling short of intended mark.
This is a stupid hadith that should not have been fabricated. No wonder it was just classified as hasan by Tirmidhi and only promoted by a 20th century idiot as sahih.
The part of that hadith where Umm Salamah asked questions has been added by a liar. Sahih Bukhari hadith 5784 clearly stated that it was Abu Bakar who responded to the Apostle's edict regarding men letting their clothes trailing behind. Not Um Salamah.
Abu Bakar r.a. only said something about his izar trailing if not corrected regularly and the Apostle replied that Abu Bakar did not do it out of conceit.
Last edited by :::: on 15-10-2015 10:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 1-10-2015 02:33 PM
