|
View: 9318|Reply: 27
|
which is beter? Amrram or amrramski? Aim 9x or R73?
[Copy link]
|
|
|
Amrramski
Engine Solid fuel rocket motor (R-77), air-breathing ramjet (R-77M1)
Launch mass 175 kg (R-77), 226 kg (R-77M1)
Length 3.6 m (R-77)
Diameter 200 mm
Wingspan 350 mm
Speed over Mach 4 (R-77)
Range 90 km (R-77), 175 km (R-77M1)(under developmen)
Warhead 30 kg HE, fragmenting
Guidance Inertial with mid-course update and terminal active radar homing Fuzes laser proximity fuze
Amrram
Engine High-performance directed rocket motor
Launch mass 335 lb (152 kg)
Length 12 ft (3.66 m)
Diameter 7 in (178 mm)
Wingspan 20.7 in (526 mm) (AIM-120A/B)
Speed Mach 4
Range AIM-120A/B: 75 km (45 mi)
AIM-120C-5: 105 km (65 mi)
AIM-120D: >180km (112 mi)(under developmen)
Warhead High explosive blast-fragmentation
AIM-120A/B: 50 pounds (23 kg) WDU-33/B blast-fragmentation
AIM-120C-5: 40 pounds (18 kg) WDU-41/B blast-fragmentation
Guidance INS, active radar
[ Last edited by belacan79 at 20-2-2008 06:09 PM ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #2 yaminz's post
 lum habis post. tak sabar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R-73
Engine solid-fuel rocket engine
Launch mass 105 kg (231 lb)
Length 2900 mm (9 ft 6 in)
Diameter 170 mm (6.7 in) Wingspan 510 mm (20 in)
Speed Mach 2.5
Range 30 km (18.75 mi)
Warhead 7.4 kg (16.3 lb)
Guidance infrared homing
Aim-9X
Length 3.02m(118.8 in)
Finspan .28m(11 in)
Diameter 12.7 cm(5 in)
Speed: ? > Mach 2.5
Range: 40 + km(22 + nm)
Warhead: annular blast fragmentation
Guidance: IR (Imaging Infrared) seeker integrated with JHMCS(first look, first shot capability),
IR Focal Plane Array (FPA) seeker assembly for detecting the target
Older Aim misel
Engine Solid-fuel rocket
Launch mass 190 lb (91 kg)
Length 9 ft 4.2 in (2.85 m)
Diameter 5 in (127 mm)
Wingspan 24.8 in (630 mm)
Speed Mach 2.5
Range 0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #3 belacan79's post
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bikin spoil jer si yaminz ni
delete jerla post dier sume.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Misel Europah
MBDA Meteor
Engine throttleable ducted rocket
Launch mass 185 kg (407 lb)[2]
Length 3.65 m (12.00 ft)[2]
Diameter 0.178 m (7.00 in)
Speed over Mach 4
Range 100+ km (60+ mi)
Warhead high explosive blast/fragmentation
Guidance inertial mid-course with datalinked updates, active radar terminal guidance
Fuzes radar proximity and impact
Asraam
Engine solid rocket motor
Launch mass 88 kg
Length 2.90 m
Diameter 166 mm
Wingspan 450 mm
Speed Mach 3.5
Range 300 m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #6 demonicboy's post
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hard to say.
AMRAAM and Aim-9x both have very good ECCM systems and are very difficult to decoy. They also have re-attack modes in case they missed a target. The -9X in particular has excellent off-boresight capability and lock on after launch (LOAL). It's also equipped with some revolutionary new rocket motor. But for now both missiles lag behind Russia in the propulsion department.
R-77 and R-73 however both possess great kinetic statistics with unparelled range (at least until Meteor and Aim-120D) and also very good maneuverability, for example those potato-masher fins on the R-77. However Russian equipment is quite unreliable and there is a very poor standard of Q.C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dude. The older amrram A/B has lower renge. But not the Amrram 120-C5. It poseses new roket motor for increase renge and more renge than kurent
amrramski. Aim-9x also has longer renge then R-73. Most contris like US, Singapore, Thai, etc are using Amrram 120-C5 and Aim-9x now. Malaysia also has Amrram 120-C5.  A lot poeple are using stats for Amrram A/B but there is a lot of version. New and coming version is Amrram 120-D. Pls do your homework.
Data for AIM-120A/B/C:
| | AIM-120A/B | AIM-120C-5 | | Length | 3.66 m (12 ft) | | Wingspan | 53.3 cm (21 in) | 44.7 cm (17.6 in) | | Finspan | 63.5 cm (25 in) | 44.7 cm (17.6 in) | | Diameter | 17.8 cm (7 in) | | Weight | 157 kg (345 lb) | | Speed | Mach 4 | | Range | 50-70 km (30-45 miles) | > 105 km (65 miles) | | Propulsion | Hercules/Aerojet solid-fueled rocket | | Warhead | 23 kg (50 lb) WDU-33/B blast-fragmentation | 18 kg (40 lb) WDU-41/B blast-fragmentation |
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-120.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data for AIM-9B/D/E/G/H/J/L/M/N/X:
| | AIM-9B | AIM-9D/G/H | AIM-9E | AIM-9J/N | AIM-9L/M | AIM-9X | | Length | 2.83 m (111.5 in) | 2.87 m (113 in) | 3.00 m (118 in) | 3.05 m (120 in) | 2.85 m (112.2 in) | 3.02 m (118.8 in) | | Finspan | 0.56 m (22 in) | 0.63 m (24.8 in) | 0.56 m (22 in) | 0.58 m (22.8 in) | 0.63 m (24.8 in) | 0.28 m (11 in) | | Diameter | 12.7 cm (5 in) | | Weight | 70 kg (155 lb) | AIM-9D: 88 kg (195 lb)
AIM-9G: 87 kg (192 lb)
AIM-9H: 84 kg (186 lb) | 74 kg (164 lb) | 77 kg (170 lb) | 86 kg (191 lb) | 85 kg (188 lb) | | Speed | Mach 1.7 | Mach 2.5+ | ? | | Range | 4.8 km (2.6 nm) | 18 km (9.7 nm) | 4.2 km (2.3 nm) | 18 km (9.7 nm) | 40+ km (22+ nm) ? | | Propulsion | Thiokol MK 17
solid-fuel rocket | Hercules MK 36
solid-fuel rocket | Thiokol/Aerojet MK 17 | Hercules/Bermite MK 36 | | Warhead | 4.5 kg (10 lb)
blast-fragmentation | 11 kg (25 lb) MK 48 continuous rod | 4.5 kg (10 lb) blast-fragmentation | 9.4 kg (20.8 lb) WDU-17/B
annular blast-fragmentation |
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-9.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #11 belacan79's post
|
Are you sure Aim-9X is 40km? That sounds a bit too high. It should be at most 25km. If you compare it to Aim-9L/M, they use the same motor, same warhead and have similar weight but the range is so different. Even though the Aim-9X has a redesigned body for maximum aerodynamics it does not justify a 2x range increase. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIM-9X given production order
Raytheon's AIM-9X next-generation Sidewinder short-range air-to-air missile (AAM) has been approved for low-rate initial production (LRIP).
A contract for the first 120 missiles is expected to be signed by November, and the AIM-9X is due to become operational on USAir Force Boeing F-15Cs and US Navy Boeing F/A-18C/D Hornets between late 2002 and mid-2003.
Fielding the AIM-9X finally gives US forces a Sidewinder that outperforms Russia's Vympel AA-11 Archer (R-73)short-range missile, which entered service in 1986.
The USA plans to buy 10,000 missiles for the F-15 Eagle, F/A-18, Lockheed Martin F-16 and Lockheed Martin/Boeing F-22. Approval for full-rate production of 600 missiles a year is scheduled for late 2002 after completion of operational testing.
International interest in the AIM-9X is strong , says Raytheon, led by European F-16 Mid-Life Update operators. Data has been supplied to Denmark and Norway, with the latter expected to be first to choose between the AIM-9X and the multinational IRIS-T.
Switzerland is evaluating the AIM-9X against the Matra BAe Dynamics ASRAAM and Rafael Python 4 for its Hornets. Canada is looking for short- and medium-range AAMs for its F/A-18s - Australia selected the ASRAAM and Raytheon AIM-120AMRAAM for its F-18s.
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2000/09/19/120317/aim-9x-given-production-order.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Msia da dpt Amraam-120 C5 k? xtau pon erk...
Menurut laporan UN trensfer report, Malaysia beli sebanyak 20 bijik amraam 120 C5 pada tahun 2005. Dah sampai gak.....USA bukan jauh sangat   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best of both world..US and Rusia wepon  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply #19 belacan79's post
|
Rojak? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 20-2-2008 04:09 PM
变色卡
Author
