President Donald Trump is considering an executive order that would shut down the US Department of Education - a long-cherished goal of conservatives.
The move would deliver on a promise he made on the campaign trail.
Trump plans to end some of the department's programmes, while others would be housed within different parts of the government, according to US media reports.
But abolishing the department entirely would take an act of Congress.
Established in 1979, the Department of Education oversees funding for public schools, administers student loans and runs programmes that help low-income students.
Trump and his allies have accused the agency of "indoctrinating young people with inappropriate racial, sexual, and political material".
In December, he nominated former World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) CEO and his transition co-chair, Linda McMahon, as his pick for education secretary. The Senate has yet to schedule confirmation proceedings for McMahon.
The latest news comes after Trump took steps toward dismantling the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the country's main overseas development agency.
What does the Department of Education do?
A common misconception is that the Department of Education operates US schools and sets curricula – that responsibility actually belongs to states and local districts.
The agency does oversee student loan programmes and administer Pell grants that help low-income students attend university.
It also helps fund programmes to support students with disabilities and for students living in poverty.
And the department enforces civil rights law designed to prevent race or sex-based discrimination in federally funded schools.
What is its budget and how many people work there?
The department's allocation was $238bn (£188bn) in fiscal year 2024 - less than 2% of the total federal budget.
The agency says it has about 4,400 employees, the smallest of any cabinet-level department.
Most public funding for US schools comes from state and local governments.
In 2024, the Education Data Initiative estimated that the US spends a total of just over $857bn on primary and secondary education - the equivalent of $17,280 per pupil.
Can Trump shut down the department?
On his own, no.
Not only would Trump need congressional approval to get rid of the department, but under the rules he would also probably need a supermajority - 60 out of 100 senators.
Republicans have a 53-47 majority in the Senate, so they would need at least seven Democrats to vote to abolish the agency. There's zero chance of that.
A vote last year to abolish the education department - which was attached as an amendment to another bill - failed to pass as 60 Republicans joined all Democrats in the House to vote no.
Trump has moved to shrink other government departments in recent days, despite questions about the legality of those moves.
A draft of Trump's order to dismantle the education department, obtained by the Washington Post, acknowledges that only Congress can get rid of the agency outright, but executive action could direct the agency to begin to wind itself down.
Education department employees are among those who are the focus of the administration's efforts to shrink the federal workforce.
Why do Republicans want to abolish it?
The idea of eliminating the education department has been floated by Republicans for nearly as long as it has been in existence.
During Ronald Reagan's 1980 presidential campaign, he pushed for it to be dismantled.
Republicans have historically pushed against centralising education policy, believing that it is best left up to individual states and localities.
More recently they have accused the education department of pushing what they describe as "woke" political ideology on to children, including on gender and race.
Conservatives also argue that other education department functions, such as administering loans, should be handled instead by the US Department of Treasury, and that civil rights infractions are the Department of Justice's domain.
Trump's allies also want to expand school choice, which would allow students and families to use public money to select private or religious alternatives to public schools.
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
Post time 12-2-2025 12:20 PMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
Betul.. tp belum dismantle lagi kan sbb banyak prosedur. Iols ada follow fb group cg2 kat us sana, deyols sibuk tanya acaner ngan edu loan deyols if this is true
gilo. dahle aku baca hari tu literacy rate kt USA tu 79% jah, tu statistik orang dewasa tu. maksudnye 21% org dewasa tak reti membaca kt sana. populasi usa 335juta, meaning 70 juta orang dewasa kt sana tak reti membaca hokkay. ko banding ngan malaysia 96% literacy rate. makin bengap la generasi kt sana
Post time 12-2-2025 12:43 PMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
Loose analogy di Malaysia adalah Jakim bawah federal government. Tapi hal ehwal agama islam adalah di bawah bidang kuasa setiap kerajaan negeri. Sebab itu orang pertikaikan apa sebenarnya fungsi jabatan itu di peringkat persekutuan.
Aku baca pun mcm ni jugak. Tapi jabtan edu yg abolished ni pun katanya cuma incharge bab loans utk students tak mampu saja takde kaitan dgn penggubalan sukatqn pelajaran ke or apa2 yg mcm tu.
So jakim ni mmg dah elok kena abolish, bertindih sgttt takde keperluan
Author|Post time 12-2-2025 11:01 PMFrom the mobile phone|Show all posts
Edited by Mahathirina at 12-2-2025 11:05 PM
malarky replied at 12-2-2025 05:10 PM
certainly not the greatest country in the world
Habis itik bagai dia pegi sebut:
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 7301 of title 5, United States Code, it is hereby ordered:
Section 1. Policy and Purpose. In the final days of the prior administration’s tenure, it purposefully finalized collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) with Federal employees in an effort to harm my Administration by extending its wasteful and failing policies beyond its time in office. For example, the Department of Education negotiated a CBA on January 17, 2025 — 3 days before I took office — that generally prohibits the agency from returning remote employees to their offices.
Such last-minute, lame-duck CBAs, which purport to bind a new President to his predecessor’s policies, run counter to America’s system of democratic self-government. CBAs quickly negotiated to include extreme policies on the eve of a new administration are purposefully designed to circumvent the will of the people and our democracy. Such CBAs inhibit the President’s authority to manage the executive branch by tying his hands with inefficient and ineffective practices. The Supreme Court has explained that a President “cannot choose to bind his successors by diminishing their powers.”
Therefore, it is the policy of the executive branch that CBAs executed in the 30 days prior to the inauguration of a new President, and that purport to remain in effect despite the inauguration of a new President and administration, shall not be approved.
This post contains more resources
You have to Login for download or view attachment(s). No Account? Register
Post time 11-2-2025 04:20 PM
变色卡
Post time 12-2-2025 12:42 PM
Author
