|
|
Akhirnya, Hadi Bentangkan Usul Pindaan Akta 355 Di Dewan Rakyat
[Copy link]
|
|
|
whitemagic replied at 7-4-2017 10:40 AM
ketika parti komponen BN seperti SPDP sudah mula menyokong RUU355
DAP pula siap buat statement ka ...
Cacai buat2 buta gmbar yg aku post? Bodoh punya cacai  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apa pon fakta dia bagi, aku boleh cantas dgn mudah.. Nampak sangat kelaut pemahaman cai DAPig neh... Tu la.. blaja Bahasa Melayu dgn Cinapek.. memang kelaut la pemahaman dia..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
semalam ahli parlimen parti mana yang bangun berdiri dengan lantangnya menentang pembentangan RUU355?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mungkin mereka ini adalah melayu yang jadi tukang screw melayu lain yang dimaksudkan oleh DAP?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namirulmukminin replied at 7-4-2017 10:44 AM
Kahkahkah.. punya dah takdak modal, sampai berita hak dah berkurun pon cedok balik..
T ...
So boleh tak tepek kenyataan yg mereka akan sokong ruu355 lepas dah paham benda ni? Selagi xde kenyataan terbaru, kenyataan lama masih terpakai.
BN parties say knew Hadi’s Bill would be deferred after being tabled.
KUALA LUMPUR, April 6 — Barisan Nasional had already decided that they would allow PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang’s private member’s bill to be tabled but not debated, party leaders confirmed today.
MIC president Datuk Seri Dr S Subramaniam said the decision to postpone the debate for the Shariah courts (criminal jurisdiction) amendment bill had already been made during the previous BN Supreme Council meeting.
“The decision was to allow PAS to present their case and there was agreement that there won’t be voting today. So as far as that is concerned, we followed the decision in the BN Council,” he told reporters when met outside Parliament today.
When asked to explain further, Dr Subramaniam said “Within the BN we have proposed our stand that it is best not to go for an open debate.”
The Health Minister added that MIC however was prepared to debate against the Bill if they had been given the chance by Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia.
“If the Speaker had actually opened it for other parties to participate in the debate, then we would have given our view points, from the constitutional legal point of view on what is the opinion of MIC as far as this is concerned,” Subramaniam added.
He also refuted the claims made by PAS leaders that non-Muslims would not be affected by the amendment and instead pointed out that backtracking of a previous amendment showed otherwise.
“Despite that there were some concerns, for example Article 121A when it was first amended, there was this same consolation given that non-Muslims will never be affected but subsequently we have the cases like Indira Gandhi case despite those assurances being given,” Dr Subramaniam explained.
Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah (PBRS) president Tan Sri Joseph Kurup also said that the there was a BN consensus to only allow the Bill to be tabled.
“There was actually a decision but only to introduce (the Bill) and that’s it,” he told reporters when met.
Putrajaya yesterday rushed five federal bills and deferred four more in a marathon sitting that lasted 20 hours to pave way to the PAS president’s private member’s bill to amend Shariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act to be on top of order paper today.
However, after initial presentation and secondment of the bill, Pandikar deferred debates to the next session.
- See more at: http://m.themalaymailonline.com/ ... thash.PT9JhftM.dpuf
P/s: ni yg walaun dan cacai bangga mca mic gerakan membantah padahal diorang dah tau benda tu hanya akam dibentang tanpa perbahasan dan undian akan dibuat. Dah kena tipu pon masih in denial kahkahkah...!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yg tepek teks penuh arwah tu bukan aku ke...dan yg amik quote separuh2 tu bkn ko ke?
perenggan pertama lagi dah arwah x setuju dgn ucapan menteri ttg pindaan 355....arwah siap cerita alasan kenapa beliau tak setuju dgn ucapan menteri yg sokong pindaan 355 tu..tup tup ko nak kata arwah bersetuju plak??...kena cek otak cam hadi gak ko ni
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qumbu replied at 7-4-2017 11:01 AM
Tak dibentang melalak... ditanggoh pembentangan melalak...dah dibentang melalak...tunggu Julai plak. ...
Bentang tanpa perbahasan dan undian. Kau xnmpak ke tipu daya umngok nak drag issue ni smpai ke pru14. Benda cmni pon walaun2 buta xnmpak.bodoh betul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aHoi83 replied at 7-4-2017 11:15 AM
Akak pun ade baca n komen dkt thread tu. Nampak sgt try nk main pscology. Terang2 usul by pas dh k ...
Parti bn semua dah tau bill tu hanya dibentang saja tanpa perbahasan sbb tu mereka diam xmembantah. Bodoh betul walaun pas dan cacai umngok. Kahkahkah...!!
BN parties say knew Hadi’s Bill would be deferred after being tabled.
KUALA LUMPUR, April 6 — Barisan Nasional had already decided that they would allow PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang’s private member’s bill to be tabled but not debated, party leaders confirmed today.
MIC president Datuk Seri Dr S Subramaniam said the decision to postpone the debate for the Shariah courts (criminal jurisdiction) amendment bill had already been made during the previous BN Supreme Council meeting.
“The decision was to allow PAS to present their case and there was agreement that there won’t be voting today. So as far as that is concerned, we followed the decision in the BN Council,” he told reporters when met outside Parliament today.
When asked to explain further, Dr Subramaniam said “Within the BN we have proposed our stand that it is best not to go for an open debate.”
The Health Minister added that MIC however was prepared to debate against the Bill if they had been given the chance by Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia.
“If the Speaker had actually opened it for other parties to participate in the debate, then we would have given our view points, from the constitutional legal point of view on what is the opinion of MIC as far as this is concerned,” Subramaniam added.
He also refuted the claims made by PAS leaders that non-Muslims would not be affected by the amendment and instead pointed out that backtracking of a previous amendment showed otherwise.
“Despite that there were some concerns, for example Article 121A when it was first amended, there was this same consolation given that non-Muslims will never be affected but subsequently we have the cases like Indira Gandhi case despite those assurances being given,” Dr Subramaniam explained.
Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah (PBRS) president Tan Sri Joseph Kurup also said that the there was a BN consensus to only allow the Bill to be tabled.
“There was actually a decision but only to introduce (the Bill) and that’s it,” he told reporters when met.
Putrajaya yesterday rushed five federal bills and deferred four more in a marathon sitting that lasted 20 hours to pave way to the PAS president’s private member’s bill to amend Shariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act to be on top of order paper today.
However, after initial presentation and secondment of the bill, Pandikar deferred debates to the next session.
- See more at: http://m.themalaymailonline.com/ ... thash.PT9JhftM.dpuf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BN tak sebodo PAS...dorang kena game jerrr...igt buta2 ke BN kasi bentang..konfom ada agenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
whitemagic replied at 7-4-2017 11:56 AM
semalam ahli parlimen parti mana yang bangun berdiri dengan lantangnya menentang pembentangan RUU3 ...
Sebab diorang dah tau xkan dibahaskan so buat apa nak bangun bantah kan? Bodoh tak kau??
BN parties say knew Hadi’s Bill would be deferred after being tabled.
KUALA LUMPUR, April 6 — Barisan Nasional had already decided that they would allow PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang’s private member’s bill to be tabled but not debated, party leaders confirmed today.
MIC president Datuk Seri Dr S Subramaniam said the decision to postpone the debate for the Shariah courts (criminal jurisdiction) amendment bill had already been made during the previous BN Supreme Council meeting.
“The decision was to allow PAS to present their case and there was agreement that there won’t be voting today. So as far as that is concerned, we followed the decision in the BN Council,” he told reporters when met outside Parliament today.
When asked to explain further, Dr Subramaniam said “Within the BN we have proposed our stand that it is best not to go for an open debate.”
The Health Minister added that MIC however was prepared to debate against the Bill if they had been given the chance by Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia.
“If the Speaker had actually opened it for other parties to participate in the debate, then we would have given our view points, from the constitutional legal point of view on what is the opinion of MIC as far as this is concerned,” Subramaniam added.
He also refuted the claims made by PAS leaders that non-Muslims would not be affected by the amendment and instead pointed out that backtracking of a previous amendment showed otherwise.
“Despite that there were some concerns, for example Article 121A when it was first amended, there was this same consolation given that non-Muslims will never be affected but subsequently we have the cases like Indira Gandhi case despite those assurances being given,” Dr Subramaniam explained.
Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah (PBRS) president Tan Sri Joseph Kurup also said that the there was a BN consensus to only allow the Bill to be tabled.
“There was actually a decision but only to introduce (the Bill) and that’s it,” he told reporters when met.
Putrajaya yesterday rushed five federal bills and deferred four more in a marathon sitting that lasted 20 hours to pave way to the PAS president’s private member’s bill to amend Shariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act to be on top of order paper today.
However, after initial presentation and secondment of the bill, Pandikar deferred debates to the next session.
- See more at: http://m.themalaymailonline.com/ ... thash.PT9JhftM.dpuf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kan ditanggoh bulan Julai 2017.....kita tunggu dan tengok ler...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Health Minister added that MIC however was prepared to debate against the Bill if they had been given the chance by Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
diorang bangkang utk bentang??
mana ko dengar?
utube page sebelum ni diorang semua semangat nak bahas...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kecimpret replied at 7-4-2017 12:04 PM
BN tak sebodo PAS...dorang kena game jerrr...igt buta2 ke BN kasi bentang..konfom ada agenda ...
Bn dan parti2 komponen semua dah di briefing awal2 yg usul hanya akan dibentang saja, xde undian atau perbahasan sebab tu semua diam xde membantah. Pas pulak bodoh alang hantar puji pujian pada mca mic gerakan sbb x membantah usul tu. Macam namirulmukminin cakap, mca mic gerakan xmembantah sbb diorang dah mula paham dan akaj bersetuju dgan ruu355. Kahkahkah bodoh betul walaun naif percaya sgat dgan tipu daya umngok dan bn. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kecimpret replied at 7-4-2017 12:09 PM
MIC pun bantah rupanya..mati2 aku igt DAP je yg bantah
Cacai dan walaun masing2 bengap reti salahkan dapig je. Semalam penuh puji pujian pada mca mic gerakan sbb bagi laluan utk bentang usul. Kahkahkah...!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qumbu replied at 7-4-2017 12:08 PM
Kan ditanggoh bulan Julai 2017.....kita tunggu dan tengok ler...
Kelmarij berbangga sidang berlangsung smpai 20jam sbb nak bahaskan usul lain. Tpi bila mai usul ni, parlimen tutup awal smpai kol 4 ptg je. Kenapa nak tangguh2 pulak? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sabarrrr.....tunggu jer bulan Julai 2017. Tengok cam ne....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MCA MIC dah mula paham 355??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gelang Patah MP Lim Kit Siang asked why his Bill on an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) was rejected.
Gopeng MP Dr Lee Boon Chye further asked why the four remaining Bills that were not debated on Wednesday were not given priority. Instead, he said, the Dewan Rakyat had given way to Abdul Hadi's Bill.
Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia explained that he had to accept Abdul Hadi's Bill because of an executive order by the Government to prioritise the Bill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kecimpret replied at 7-4-2017 12:15 PM
MCA MIC dah mula paham 355??
@namirulmukminin dah gi lepak dgan subramaniam tdi. Tu dia tau  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Post time 7-4-2017 11:55 AM
